You are on page 1of 6

Counterclaim in favor of Jay Grossman and Eudice Grossman (Plaintiffs), husband and wife, and 23

against both Robert Michael Davidson and Vanessa Davidson, also known as Vanessa E. Komar,

, 12 13 14 15 16

19 20 21

24

1 2 3 4

THE LAW FIRM OF

KARP, HEURLIN & WEISS, P.C. 3060 NORTH SWAN ROAD. SUITE 100 TtJCSON. ARIZONA 85712·1225

TEL (520) 325-4200

FAX (520) 325-4224

, Bruce R. Heurlln. pea 25508

Attorneys for Jay Grossman and Eudlce Grossman

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA

JAY GROSSMAN and EUDICE GROSSMAN, , husband and wife,

11 Plaintiffs,

C

No. 333954

JUDGMENT

(Judge Jane L. Eikleberry)

vs.

ROBERT MICHAEL DAVIDSON and VANESSA DAVIDSON, a.k.a. VANESSA E. KOMAR, husband and wife,

Defendants.

ROBERT MICHAEL DAVIDSON and VANESSA KOMAR,

DefendantslCounterclaimants,

17 vs.

JAY GROSSMAN and EUDICE GROSSMAN,

t 8 PlaintiffsiCounterdefendants.

Pursuant to the Court's November 9, 2004 Minute Entry and the November 23,2004, hearing and good cause appearing,

Judgment, is entered on all Counts of the First Amended Complaint and on the



,

(Defendants), husband and wife, individually, jointly, and severally and as to their marital 25

26 27

community.

The Court finds as fact that as to all Counts of the First Amended Complaint and as to

frivolous pleadings filed by the Plaintiffs in this action that Defendants acted willfully and 28

a_o.ntsonlrlllllludpnentwpd 2773-160Z-1 12404-1 155

'12

18

19 20 21

24 25 26 27 28

2 3 4

4. 5.

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress $ S-d~ 000.00 Punitive.Damages s 500. oo".p()

,

1 Damages are awarded in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants as follows:

1.

Intentional Interference with Contract:

a.

Sale of Medical Practice/Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement $

--¥-~~.,

Loss of Salary $.3,~ (p '.' ftf.f.d l)

b.

2. Intentional Defamation, Slander, and Slander Per Se, Damage to Professional and

6 Personal Reputation s 11 O.3Ji I U. 00.

3. Intentional Abuse of Process ra;:=====:::::=" ~

7

8

6. Sanctions:

a. Reimbursement of costs and attorneys' fees. s 5" g JOO.J. 7

b.

Sanctions in addition to the above $ - Q -

13 Judgment is so ordered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants in the total amount of

14 s 7, tl.£f,04 1.1.7

The total amount of this Judgment shall earn interest at the legal rate of 10% per annum

from the date of this Judgment until paid in full.

DATED November l:f_, 2004.

"'.

OJOSSRllll-DavidsonlFinaJ JudsmenLwpd zn3-1602-112404-IIS5 2

11

JA Y GROSSMAN and EUDICE GROSSMAN, Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants.

05 JM{ -4 PH 3: 05

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA

20 Pursuant to the Court's November 9, 2004 Minute Entry and the November 23, 2004,

21 hearing and good cause appearing,

22 Judgment is entered on all Counts of the First Amended Complaint and on the 2J Counterclaim in favor of Jay Grossman and Eudice Grossman (Plaintiffs), husband and wife, and 24 against both Robert Michael Davidson and Vanessa Davidson, also known as VanessaE. Komar, 25 (Defendants), husband and wife, individually, jointly, and severally and as to their marital 26 community.

27 The Court finds as fact that as to all Counts of the First Amended Complaint and as to 28 frivolous pleadings filed by the Plaintiffs in this action that Defendants acted willfully and

2 3 4

THE LAW FIRM OF

KARP, HEURLIN & WEISS, P.C.

3060 NORTH SWAN ROAD. SUITE 100 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85712-1225 TEL (520) 325-4200

FAX (520) 325-4224

5 Bruce R He1Jt1in, PCC# 25508

Attorneys for Jay Grossman and Eudioe Grossman

6 7 8 9

10

JAY GROSSMAN and EUDICE GROSSMAN, husband and wife,

Plaintiffs,

vs,

12 13

ROBERT MICHAEL DAVIDSON and VANESSA DA VIDSON, a.k.a, VANESSA E. KOMAR, husband and wife,

14

Defendants.

15 16

ROBERT MICHAEL DAVIDSON and VANESSA KOMAR,

Defendants/Counterclaimants,

17 vs.

18

19

Grossman-Davidson'Amended Final Judgment. wpd 2773·1602·122004-a430

No. C 333954 AMENDED JUDGMENT (Nunc Pro Tunc)

(Judge Jane L. Eikleberry)

Grossman v. Davidson C-333954 maliciously and with the intent to cause injury to Plaintiffs.

2 Damages are awarded in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants as follows:

3 4

5 6

I.

Intentional Interference with Contract:

a.

Sale of Medical PracticelStockPurchase and Sale Agreement $2,493,921.00. Loss of Salary $3.261.699.00.

b.

2.

Intentional Defamation, Slander, and Slander Per Se, Damage to Professional and

7 Personal Reputation $1,035,111.00.

8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

24 25

26

27

28

3. 4. 5. 6.

Intentional Abuse of Process - and-

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress $500,000.00. Punitive Damages $500,000.00.

Sanctions:

a. Reimbursement of costs and attorneys' fees $58,300.27.

b. Sanctions in addition to the above $ -0-

Judgment is so ordered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants in the total amount of

$7,849,031.27.

The total amount of this Judgment shall earn interest at the legal rate of 10% per annum from the date of this Judgment until paid in full.

DATED December __ , 2004:--

g-~3/~or;

~~'''''''''''I..,...j'''--'E;''''''B~~ dge, Pima countf~Q

Grossman-Davidson\Amended FinaJ Judgment. wpd 277 3~t602- t 22004-0430

2

2

Defendants/Counterclairnants,

:~ I~ ~ ~

" i ,'.~': '-1

. I ','-

3

THE LAW FIRM OF

KARP, HEURLIN & WEISS, P. C.

3060 NORTH SWAN ROAD, SUITE 100 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85712-1225 TEL (520) 325-4200

FAX (520) 325-4224

41

5

Bruce R. Heurlln, PCC# 25508

Attorneys for Jay Grossman and Eudice Grossman

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA

9 10 11 12

13

and wife,

No. C 333954

SECOND AMENDED .JUDGMENT (Nunc Pro Tunc)

(Judge Jane L. Eikleberry)

JA Y GROSSMAN and EUDICE GROSSMAN, husband and wife,

Plaintiffs,

YS.

ROBERT MICHAEL DAVIDSON and VANESSA DA VIDSON, a.k.a. VANESSA E. KOMAR, husband

14

Defendants.

15 16

ROBERT MICHAEL DAVIDSON and VANESSA KOMAR,

17 vs.

JA Y GROSSMAN and EUDICE GROSSMAN,

18 Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants.

19

20 Pursuant to the Court's November 9, 2004 Minute Entry and the November 23, 2004,

21 hearing and good cause appearing,

22 Judgment is entered on all Counts of the First Amended Complaint and on the 23 Counterclaim in favor of Jay Grossman and Eudice Grossman (Plaintiffs), husband and wife, and 24 against both Robert Michael Davidson and Vanessa Davidson, also known as Vanessa E. Komar, 25 (Defendants), husband and wife, individually, jointly, and severally and as to their marital

26 community.

27 The Court finds as fact that as to all Counts of the First Amended Complaint and as to 28 frivolous pleadings filed by the Defendants in this action that Defendants acted willfully and

I'

3

Grossman v. Davidson C-333954 maliciously and with the intent to cause injury to Plaintiffs.

2 Damages are awarded in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants as follows:

1.

Intentional Interference with Contract:

4

1. 2.

Sale of Medical Practice/Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement $?,4 93,921.00. Loss of Salary $3,261,699.00.

5 6

2.

Intentional Defamation, Slander, and Slander Per Se, Damage to Professional and

7 Personal Reputation $1,035,111.00.

Intentional Abuse of Process - and-

3. 4. 5. 6.

8 9

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress $500,000.00. Punitive Damages $500,000.00.

10 11 12 13

Sanctions:

1. Reimbursement of costs and attorneys' fees $58,300.27.

2. Sanctions in addition to the above $ -0-

14

Judgment is so ordered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants in the total amount of

$7,849.031.27.

15 16 17 18 19

The total amount of this Judgment shall eam interest at the legal rate of 10% per annum from the date of this Judgment until paid in full.

DATED~, 2005.

20

21

22

24

25

26

27

28

, "