Professional Documents
Culture Documents
e-ISSN: 2278-487X, p-ISSN: 2319-7668. Volume 16, Issue 1. Ver. VI (Feb. 2014), PP 76-81
www.iosrjournals.org
Abstract: The study is carried out to explore the impact of human resource practices on employee retention
and employee Commitment in the telecom Sector of Pakistan. It further investigates the mediating role of
employee loyalty with HRM practices, Employee Commitment and Employee Retention. The data was collected
through questionnaire. About 250 Questionnaires were filled from the employees of different telecom firms in
Rawalpindi and Islamabad. For interpretation and analysis of data Correlation, Regression and Sobel Tests
were conducted. The results showed that different human resource practices have a significant impact on the
employee commitment and employee retention. Further the result revealed that loyalty mediates the relation of
HRM and Employee Commitment and the relationship of HRM and Employee Retention.
I.
Introduction:
76 | Page
The Impact of Human Resource Practices on Employee Commitment and Employee Retention in
as the mediating variable here. Therefore, it is hoped that the study can contribute to the growing literature by
examining the impact of human resource management practices on employees retention and commitment in
Pakistan context.
Objective of the Study
1. To explore the relationship of HRM practices and Employee Commitment
2. To explore the relationship of HRM practices and Employee Retention.
3. To examine the relationship of HRM practices and Loyalty
4. To examine the relationship of Loyalty and Employee Commitment
5. To prospect the relationship of Loyalty and Employee retention
6. To inspect the mediating role of Loyalty on the relationship of HRM practices and Employee
Commitment
7. To explore the mediating role of Loyalty on the relationship of HRM practices and Employee
Retention.
Significance of the Study
Currently this research would be significant in diagnosing the success of HRM practices. The Study
has its importance in explaining the implementation of HRM practices and their Contribution towards the
success keeping the employee within the organization. The study excellence lies in the facts on how to increase
the Employee Commitment and to gain the employee loyalty by lowering the turnover rate. The result of the
Study would help in developing a better understanding on how to manage the HRM practices keeping in view
the dimensions of Employee Commitment, Employee Retention and Loyalty. This research is the guidance tool
for the telecom companies as it provides the company with the information that fair HRM practices has greater
impact on the Employee retention rate and their commitment to the firm.
II.
Review Of Literature
77 | Page
The Impact of Human Resource Practices on Employee Commitment and Employee Retention in
Based on the above discussion following hypothetical interaction and hypothesis may be inferred:
III.
Methodology
The Research Study is causal and Cross-Sectional in nature inspecting the impact of HRM practices on
Employee Retention and Employee Commitment with a mediating role of Loyalty in Telecom sector of
Pakistan. Questionnaire of Rathnaweerage, R. (2010) is selected for data collection..The first part of the
Questionnaire was to measure the demographics and the second part was to assess the information related to
HRM practices, Employee Commitment, Employee Retention and Loyalty. Data was collected from 250
employees of telecom companies that were Telenor, Warid, U-fone, Zong and Mobilink. The response rate is
95%.
Cronbachs Alpha reliability for each variable was above 0.7 ensuring that the data is internally consistent.
www.iosrjournals.org
78 | Page
The Impact of Human Resource Practices on Employee Commitment and Employee Retention in
4.Data Analysis and Discussion
Regression, Correlation and Sobel Test were conducted to analyze the data and to inspect the
hypotheses. The Sobel Test is conducted but before that correlation and regression was applied as it is one of the
perquisites of Sobel Test.
4.1 Hypothesis Testing
Table 4.1.1 Regression Analysis of Employee Commitment and Employee Retention on Loyalty
Employee Commitment*
Beta
t
Loyalty
0.952
10.662
Employee Retention*
Beta
t
Sig.
0.000
0.983
8.626
Sig.
0.000
*dependent variable
Table 4.1.2 Regression Analysis of HRM practices on Employee Commitment and Employee Retention
respectively.
Employee Commitment*
Employee Retention*
Independent Variables
Recruitment and Selection
Beta
0.923
t
26.131
Sig.
0.000
Beta
0.847
t
17.283
Sig.
0.000
0.007
0.81
0.935
0.029
0.311
0.756
Performance Evaluation
0.127
1.388
0.168
0.041
0.446
0.656
Promotion Practices
0.87
0.951
0.343
0.099
1.082
0.282
0.780
13.518
0.000
0.734
11.738
0.000
0.965
39.819
0.000
0.878
19.939
0.000
*dependent variable
The first hypothesis of the study was that Loyalty positively influences the employee commitment. According to
the table of regression Analysis p-values shows the significant relationship of the loyalty and employee
commitment hence hypothesis stood true. The impact of the loyalty as per Beta value i.e. 0952 with employee
commitment has found almost 95%. The second hypothesis stated that loyalty positively influences the
employee retention. According to the table of regression Analysis p-values shows the significant relationship of
the loyalty and employee retention proving the hypothesis true. The impact of the loyalty as per Beta value i.e.
.0983 on Employee Retention is found almost 98%.
The third hypothesis is that the fair recruitment and selection positively influence employee
commitment. According to the table of regression analysis there is a significant relationship. The impact of
recruitment and selection as per Beta value i.e. 0.923 on employee commitment which is 92%. The fourth
hypothesis of the study was that fair recruitment and selection significantly influence employee retention.
According to the table, there is a significant relationship. The impact of recruitment and selection as per Beta
value i.e. 0.847 on employee retention which is 85%. The fifth hypothesis is that training and development
positively influence employee commitment is rejected by the results shown in the regression table as per pvalue. The sixth hypothesis is training and development positively influences employee retention is also
rejected due to insignificant p-value. The seventh hypothesis that fair performance evaluation system positively
influence employee commitment proved wrong as due the insignificant p-value. According to the table of
regression analysis there is no significant relationship. The eighth Hypothesis was that fair performance
appraisal system positively influences employee retention. According to the table of regression analysis there is
no significant relationship so null hypothesis is accepted. The ninth hypothesis was that promotion practices
positively influences employee commitment. According to the table of regression analysis there is no significant
relationship.
The tenth hypothesis that Promotion Practices positively influence Employee Retention could not
proved as the p-value was not significant. The eleventh hypothesis was that fair compensation and social
benefits positively influence employee commitment. According to the table of regression analysis there is a
significant relationship. The impact of fair compensation and social benefits as per Beta value i.e. 0.780 on
employee commitment which is 78%. The twelfth hypothesis was that fair compensation and social benefits
positively influences employee retention. According to the table of regression analysis there is a significant
relationship. The impact of fair compensation and social benefits as per Beta value i.e. 0.734 on employee
retention which is 73.4%. The thirteenth hypothesis was that grievance handling system positively influences
employee commitment. According to the table of regression analysis there is a significant relationship. The
www.iosrjournals.org
79 | Page
The Impact of Human Resource Practices on Employee Commitment and Employee Retention in
impact of grievance handling system as per Beta value i.e. 0.965 on employee commitment which is 96.5%. The
fourteenth hypothesis was that grievance handling system positively influences employee retention. According
to the table of regression analysis there is a significant relationship. The impact of grievance handling system as
per Beta value i.e. 0.878 on Employee Retention which is 87.8%.
Sobel test Statistics
L as a mediator in the relationship of
Recruitment and selection and Employee Commitment
L as a mediator in the relationship of
Compensation and Social Benefits and Employee Commitment
L as a mediator in the relationship of
Grievances Handling System and Employee Commitment
L as a mediator in the relationship of
Recruitment and Selection and Employee Retention
L as a mediator in the relationship of
Compensation and Social Benefits and Employee Retention
L as a mediator in the relationship of
Grievances Handling System and Employee Retention
p-Value
18.15861025
11.935055
21.44488899
20.35637979
12.450627
24.96027439
References:
[1].
[2].
[3].
[4].
[5].
[6].
[7].
Armstrong, M. (2009) Armstrongs Handbook of Human Resource management Practice. Replika Press Private Limites
Chen, Z. (2001) Further investigation of the outcomes of loyalty to supervisor: Job satisfaction and intention to stay.
Oya Erdil & Ayue Gunsel Gebze., Relationships Between Human Resource Management Practices, Business Strate- Gy Fit And
Firm Performance.
Khan, N., Ahmed, S. F., Ibrahim, M., Shahid, M. K. (2012). Impact of On- job training on performance of Telecom Industry.
Riaz, A. &Ramay, M. (2010).Antecedents of job satisfaction: A study of telecom sector
Shah, S. S. H., Fatima, M., Waris, S., Aziz, J., Jaffari, A. R. (2012). The Causal Relationship of Training on Organization
PerformanceKira,
M., F.M. Van Eijnatten and B.B. David, (2010).Crafting sustainable work: Development of personal resources.
www.iosrjournals.org
80 | Page
The Impact of Human Resource Practices on Employee Commitment and Employee Retention in
[8].
[9].
[10].
[11].
[12].
[13].
[14].
[15].
[16].
[17].
[18].
[19].
Yasmin, R., Waris, S., Jaffari, A. R., Aziz, J., Wasiq Ejaz1 andFatima, M. (2012). The Impact of HR Dimensions on organizational
performance
Mohammad et. al (2009) Human Resource Practices and Organizational Performance Incentives as Moderator.
Wan, H. L. Employee Loyalty at the workplace: the impact of Japanese Style of Human Resource Management
Syed ,N.& Yan, L. X. (2012). Impact of High Performance Human Resource Management Practices on Employee Job Satisfaction:
Empirical Analysis
Gardner, T. M., Moynihan, L. M., Wright, P. M. (2003). The impact of HR practices on the performance of business units
Shoaib, M., Noor, A., Tirmizi S. R., Bashir, S. (2009). Determinants of Employee Retention in Telecom Sector of Pakistan.
Rathnaweerage, R. (2010), Human Resource Management practices and their outcomes such as employee satisfaction, commitment
and retention.
Michel, Zaitouni M., Sawalha, N. N., AdilElSharif. (2011). The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on
Organizational Commitment in the Banking Sector in Kuwait
Sohail, N., Muneer A., Tariq. Y.T. (2011). Losing Your Best Talent: Employee Retention The Dilemma Of Textile Industry
Khatri, N.,(1999). Emerging issues in Strategic HRM IN Singapore
Michel, Zaitouni M., Sawalha, N. N., AdilElSharif. (2011). The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on
Organizational Commitment in the Banking Sector in Kuwait
Tiwari, P. (2012). Human Resource Management Practices: A comprehensive review
www.iosrjournals.org
81 | Page