Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Final Synopsis
Final Synopsis
By
SRIKANTH RAMAVATH
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
The tribal population in the State of Andhra Pradesh, and in the country
as a whole, is the most deprived and vulnerable community that faces
severe economic exclusion. Although certain constitutional safeguards are
provided, no significant economic, social and political mobility has taken
place across this community. Contrary to Scheduled Castes and other
Backward Castes who witnessed certain degrees of progress because of
protective discrimination policies of the government, the Scheduled Tribes
remain abysmally backward and socially excluded, still living in harsh
environs.
The STs of Andhra Pradesh constitute 6.75 percent of Indias tribal population. although
the states STs comprise only 6.59 percent of the states population, they account for the largest
tribal concentration in Southern India. The Scheduled Areas of Andhra Pradesh, covered by the
Tribal Sub-Plan (TSP) approach, are spread over 31,485 sq km in 5936 villages (11,855
habitation) in the districts of Srikakulam, Vizianagaram, Visakhapatnam, East Godavari, West
Godavari, Warangal, Khammam, Adilabad and Kurnool. The 35 reported ST communities are
mainly concentrated in nine districts declared as Scheduled Areas by special government order in
1950. Sixty percent of the STs live in forest areas in the Eastern Ghats, on the banks of the river
Godavari. Two-thirds of the ST population in the State of Andhra Pradesh lives in these areas.
This constitutes 11% of the total geographical area of the state. Among the 23 districts,
Khammam has the highest ST population (26.47%), followed by Adilabad (16.74%),
Visakhapatnam 14.55%), Warangal (14.10%) and Nalgonda (10.55%). This zone forms the
traditional habitat of 31 tribal communities in Scheduled Areas (sprawling 30,030 sq km) and the
rest outside. The other three tribal groups, i.e., Lambada, Yerukala and Yanadi mostly live
outside the Scheduled Areas. Out of the 33 STs, Sugalis are numerically the largest ST with a
population of 2,077,947 constituting 41.4 percent of the states ST population. They are followed
by Koya 568,019 (11.3 percent), Yanadis 462,167 (9.2 percent), Yerukulas 437,459 (8.7 percent)
and Gonds 252,038 (5 percent). These five ST communities account for 76 percent of the total
ST population in the state.
As per the census of the India 2011 Scheduled Tribes population (Largest three)
1.Sugalis etc. 320,959,
2.Yerukulas 18, 531,
3.Chenchu etc. 9 92.
At this juncture it is important to analyze the impact of NREGS on the tribes of Nalgonda
district
OBJECTIVES
HYPOTHESIS
Tribals of Nalgonda district are not optimally used the NREGA
There is institutional gap in the NREGA and development of tribes
According to the 2011 census Nalgonda district has a population of 3,483,648, roughly
equal to the nation of Panama or the US state of Connecticut.[12] This gives it a ranking of 88th in
India (out of a total of 640). The district has a population density of 245 inhabitants per square
kilometer (630 /sq mi). Its population growth rate over the decade 2001-2011 was 7.26
%.Nalgonda has a sex ratio of 982 females for every 1000 males, and a literacy rate of 65.05 %.
METHODOLOGY
Methodology applied in the present research is based on the collection of primary data
and secondary data. The data collected is distributed in to the structured tables. The primary data
is collected through the census reports. The secondary data is collected through the publishers
work in the fors of books, articles, research, journals and government documents. As the research
is envisaged to examine the pattern of the development with in the schedule tribes, due care has
been taken while making the tribes, maps keeping in view the objectives.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Gogana Anita, 2007. Special employment guarantee and poverty alleviation programme (New
century publication, New Delhi. pp: 142-153.
Amarthyasen, 1975. Employment in situation and technology some policy issues International
Labour Review, Vol.112: 45-72.
Battacharya, 1957. Rural development the search for a concept, The Economic Weekly Vol.9
Bi,3, 4-5 annual), pp: 117-119.
Singh, M.L. 1972. Unemployment in rural areas of paleman distict (Bihar): A case study in
Husaina bead block, Indian journal of Agricultural Economics, No.4 pp: 190-198.
Memoria. C. B., 1969. Agricultural problems of India, Kitab Mahal, Allahabed, P-36.
Umalele, 1975. The Design or rural development, the Thomas hopking university press,
London, p:20.
Rao. T.V.K., 1976. Philosophy, objective and aims of TRD,(Coimbatore seminar on IRD. Tamil
nadu Agricultural University), P-137.
Lional Raobbins, 1953. Reports on utility and scope, Economica, PP: 5-9.
Archer, W.G 1947 Ritual friendship in santal societyMan in India.
Ascher, W.G Tribal law and justice , New Delhi.
Aurora, G.S1972 Tribe-Caste-Classes encounters , Hyderabad,
Administrative staff college of India.
Balley, F.G 1961 Tribe and caste in India
Cameron, W.G 966 Modern social moments networks random house, Morris.
Census of India 2011 Govt of India pg. 2
Elwin, verrier 1951 the tribal act of middle India ,Oxford universities press Bombay.
Dr K Mohan Rao socio-cultural profile of tribes of Andhra Pradesh, tribal cultural research
and training institute tribal welfare department A.P.HYD.193, pg14
National industrial classification 2000 census of India 2001 Govt of India pg. 1
Srikant, L.N 1960 the schedule tribes of India, social welfare