Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Renaissance of Stable Value: Capital Preservation in Defined Contribution
The Renaissance of Stable Value: Capital Preservation in Defined Contribution
INVESTMENTS
INSTITUTE
March 2016
Research
Stable value funds are low-risk investment options in participant-directed plans that mix capital preservation with return generation. They invest in high-quality, short- and intermediate-duration fixed
income securities, and utilize wrap contracts to insulate individual plan participants from market value
fluctuations.
Stable value funds serve as an alternative to more volatile or risky asset classes and are a direct substitute for a money market fund. They typically offer a more attractive yield than money market funds,
except during periods when short-term rates are rising rapidly.
This paper describes how the underlying mix of securities and issuer characteristics have evolved
since the financial crisis, and why Callan sees stable value as a healthy and important part of the U.S.
retirement plan marketplace.
Introduction
In this paper, we seek to answer questions defined contribution (DC) plan sponsors and their participants may have about stable value funds, including mechanics, instruments, liquidity, and implementation considerations. We also look at risk and performance, address benchmarking issues,
cover recent trends, and provide key takeaways for DC plan sponsors. Stable value funds are
popular with DC plans and 529 college saving investors. According to Callans DC Index, 65% of
DC plans offer a stable value fund, and typically 14% of total plan assets are in such funds when offered. We believe stable value can be an effective investment option for DC plan participants
seeking capital preservation.
Competing vs.
Non-Competing Options
Participant-driven cash flows
out of stable value funds are
unlimited, with the exception
of transfers to competing options. Such options typically
include money market funds
or short-duration bond funds,
but may include TIPS funds
or a brokerage window. Participant flows may be limited
by an equity wash provision
which requires transferring
assets to reside in a noncompeting option for a period of up to 90 days.
3. Fixed Maturity Synthetic GIC: A combination of an underlying fixed income portfolio within a book value wrap
Duration
A measure of an
investments sensitivity to
changes in interest rates.
book value accounting for any cash flows, provided all un-
at book value.
Implementation
Vehicle Options
Stable value funds are only available in separate account and commingled fund structures.1
Separate accounts offer larger plans (over
term performance.
1 For an overview of investment vehicles, please see Callans charticle, The Investment Vehicle Owners Manual, available at
www.callan.com.
Exhibit 1
Risk vs. Return:
Stable Value Managers
vs. Benchmarks
5%
10 years ended
December 31, 2015
4%
Barclays Aggregate
Barclays Government/
Credit Intermediate
Callan Stable Value
Database (median)
Barclays Government/
Credit 13 Year
Barclays Treasury 13 Year
Return
3%
2%
3-Month Treasury
1%
0%
0%
1%
2%
Source: Callan
Exhibit 2
4%
5%
3-Month Treasury
12%
10%
8%
Total Return
Return Consistency:
Stable Value Managers
and Indices
3%
Risk
6%
4%
2%
0%
-2%
01
Source: Callan
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
Year
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
have underperformed money market funds in the past, but historically only for a very short period of
time. Similarly, the stable value group exhibits far less return volatility when compared to a benchmark
with a similar duration, such as the Barclays 15 Year Government/Credit Index.
Crediting Rate
A periodically adjusted
rate similar to an effective
annual yield.
Stable value funds issue investors a periodic return known as a crediting rate. This rate, which is published as an effective annual yield figure, is usually credited to the stable value fund on an ongoing basis.
The crediting rate is similar to the interest earned on a money market fund and is based upon the market
value, book value, yield-to-maturity, and duration of the underlying assets. The calculation is designed to
amortize the difference between the book value (purchase price) and the market value (current price) of
the underlying portfolio over time. Crediting rates are directly related to the interest rate environment, and
thus it is not surprising to see a downward trend over the last seven years (Exhibit 3). However, stable
value funds continue to offer a substantial yield advantage versus money market funds.
Exhibit 3
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Source: Callan
Market-to-Book Ratio
Market-to-book ratio is simply the ratio of the market value of the underlying assets to the book value of
the stable value portfolio. It is commonly used to measure the overall health of a stable value portfolio,
and the degree to which the portfolio has a market value shortfall (or insufficient funds to meet participant investments). It is not uncommon for a stable value fund to have a market-to-book ratio below
100% for a short period of time due to market value fluctuations. Stable value funds experiencing such
valuations should be closely monitored, as the portfolio manager must explain and defend any market
value fluctuations that result in a deficiency. Stable value funds that do not experience positive ratio
improvement over time require further investigation.
1. Cash or money market benchmarks have a similar risk profile but different return profile than
stable value funds as their underlying investments are very different. The stable value industry
has widely accepted the 3-Month Treasury bill as a benchmark. DOL rule 404(a)(5)2 mandated the
use of an appropriate, broad-based securities market index for investment strategies, and
the 3-Month Treasury Bill Index meets this standard. As such, the majority of commingled stable
value fund fact sheets have selected this index. Cash/money market benchmarks are defensible as
they represent the return a participant is forgoing by investing in stable value rather than a money
market fund. In addition to the 3-Month Treasury Index, Lipper and iMoneyNet offer money market
index options.
Pros
Cons
2. Broad market benchmarks are defensible, but they are difficult to utilize because finding a perfect
match for stable value is difficult. Broad market, fixed income benchmarks experience market value
fluctuation, and thus these benchmarks do not reflect the impact of wrap contracts. Additionally, most
have quality and sector characteristics vastly divergent from stable value funds. Investors have considered the Barclays Intermediate Aggregate or Barclays Intermediate Government/Credit Indices
as potential options. However, the Barclays Intermediate Aggregate includes too much MBS/CMBS
exposure (35%), and the Barclays Intermediate Government/Credit includes too much credit (35%).3
Barclays developed the Stable Income Market Index (SIMI) in 2010 as a potential benchmark for the
stable value market. It was designed to mimic the shorter-maturity, higher-quality profile of stable value
portfolios. However, it too lacks book value/amortized cost basis and often differs from existing funds
on a sector allocation basis. Market acceptance of this index has been minimal, in our observation.
2 United States. Department of Labor. Employee Benefits Security Administration. (2012). Fiduciary Requirements for Disclosure in
Participant-Directed Individual Account Plans (Section 2550.404a-5).
3 For a comprehensive look at fixed income indices, please see Callans annual Fixed Income Benchmark Review, available at
www.callan.com.
Stable value managers may create custom blends of off-the-shelf Barclays benchmarks, such as a
blend of 50% Barclays 13 Year Government/Credit, 35% Barclays Intermediate Government/Credit,
and 15% Barclays 3-Month Treasury. However, such blends suffer from inconsistency versus the
underlying security makeup of a stable value fund for benchmarking purposes, and again have no
correction for the impact of wrap contracts.
Pros
Cons
tized-cost adjustments
Volatility may be much higher, leading to a
risk mismatch and participant confusion
Most off-the-shelf indices offer a quality or
sector mismatch
3. Peer group comparisons offer another solution. However, they are not truly investable in that one
cannot buy the median performance. Callan recommends comparing performance versus the Callan
Stable Value Database group, as it includes the majority of institutionally viable stable value strategies.
Pros
Cons
Because no single benchmark provides an ideal solution, Callan recommends a combination of a cash/
money market benchmark (e.g., 3-Month Treasury bill) and a peer group comparison (e.g., the Callan
Stable Value Database group) to evaluate performance. A cash/money market benchmark should be used
for participant reporting purposes. This will allow the plan sponsor to evaluate its stable value option versus peers while participants will be able to gauge performance versus a typical money market alternative.
The 2008 market crisis shook the capital markets, creating unforeseen consequences across asset
classes. Stable value was no exception, with most funds facing an increase in wrap fees, wrap providers
exiting the market, duration limits, and credit rating constraints that were previously rare. In 2013, the
marketplace witnessed yet another year of metamorphosis, as several new wrap providers entered the
marketplace improving overall capacity. Most of the commingled vehicles that had been closed to new assets for several years were reopened. Increased competition from new entrants to the wrap marketplace
has stabilized fees in the range of 2226 basis points, and also improved investment guideline flexibility.
The persistent low interest rate environment has resulted in a widespread decline in crediting rates.
However, stable value continues to offer a positive yield premium over money market funds. Callan
continues to believe stable value is an attractive alternative for eligible investors seeking a capital preservation option.
Nonetheless, investors should be aware of issues that influence stable value prices and availability.
1. Current rate environment: Interest rates remain historically low, directly impacting crediting rates.
Stable value funds continue to offer a substantial yield premium over money market funds, which
are subject to regulations specifying investment in very short-dated securities. If interest rates were
to rise sharply over a short period of time, investors could experience a period during which money
market funds out-yield their stable value alternatives. Such periods have historically been very short.
2. Uncertain regulatory environment: As part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) were tasked with determining if stable value wrap contracts should be considered
swap agreements and thus fall under CFTC regulation. To date, no decision has been made. All signs
have pointed to the CFTC and SEC ultimately deciding against the regulation of wrap contracts, but this
is still to be determined. Current contracts will not be impacted, regardless of the final decision.
3. Commingled funds are open for business: After the 2008 credit crisis, numerous banks and other
financial institutions exited the wrap marketplace. This forced many stable value commingled funds
to close to new investors, due to their inability to obtain additional wrap coverage. New entrants to
the wrap marketplace, in particular insurance companies, have vastly improved this dynamic. At this
point, all of the pooled funds tracked by Callan are again accepting new deposits.
Wrap Market and Fees
With the exit of numerous wrap providers post-2008, wrap fees rose substantially (Exhibit 4). In our observation, new wrap issuance falls in the 2530 basis point range, much higher than the 810 basis point
range seen in 2008. The recent increase in competition in the form of new entrants into the wrap space
has resulted in overall wrap fees paid by most funds stabilizing in the 2225 basis point range. In particular, insurance companies have become very competitive with their wrap coverage pricing.
The addition of new entrants into the space appears to have slowed the increase in fees, and anecdotal
evidence points to a general willingness to negotiate both guideline restrictions and various expenses.
Separate accounts continue to have far greater success in obtaining attractive wrap coverage.
Exhibit 4
30
25
23.0 bps
22.0 bps
20
19.0 bps
15
10
5
2009
Source: Callan
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Exhibit 5
Median Market-to-Book
Ratio
Seven years ended
December 31, 2015
105%
100%
95%
90%
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Source: Callan
Conclusion
When DC plan sponsors are selecting a capital preservation vehicle, stable value funds remain an
Insulation from market
value volatility due to
interest rate movements
is exactly why stable
value funds are so
popular as a capital
preservation option.
attractive alternative to money market funds. Their historical yield advantage, coupled with consistent
book-value accounting, results in an investment that is well suited for the risk-averse investor. While
we are in a period of interest rate uncertainty, investors should expect market-value-to-book-value
ratios to decline in a rising interest rate environment. It would not be surprising to see a period where
the market-to-book ratios across stable value strategies remained below 100% for a period of time.
Nevertheless, investors should not be concerned about a broad-based decline in market-to-book ratios
resulting from a rising interest rate environment. Insulation from declining market values due to interest
rate volatility is exactly why stable value funds are so popular. Additionally, a rising rate environment
will ultimately allow stable value managers to reinvest in securities with higher coupon payments, and
thus should benefit investors through higher crediting rates over time. Callan continues to believe that
stable value is a strong investment option for a well-rounded DC plan.
10
11
Corporate Headquarters
Regional Offices
Callan Associates
600 Montgomery Street
Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94111
800.227.3288
415.974.5060
Atlanta
800.522.9782
Denver
855.864.3377
Chicago
800.999.3536
New Jersey
800.274.5878
www.callan.com