FILE 3 JUN 3 9 2016 4 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 10 ll 2 HEWELL-PACKARD COMPANY , Case No.: 111CV203163 B Plaintiff, JURY VERDICT a vs. | wh ed cle \ 4 15 || ORACLE CORPORATION, | Cu d Copy Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 2 24 25 26 27 28(00, HPs Claim that Oracle Breached the Contract We answer the questions submitted to us as follow 1 Did HP do all, or substantially all, of the significant things that the contract required it to do, or was it excused from doing those things? Vv Yes No If your answer to question 1 is yes, answer question 2. If you answered no, stop here, answer no further questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form. % Did Oracle fail to do something that the contract required it to do? v Yes No or Did Oracle do something that the contract prohibited it from doing? 4 Yes No If your answer to either option for question 2 is yes, then answer question 3. If you answered no to both options, stop here, answer no further questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this, form, a Was HP harmed by Oracle's breach of contract? V ves Signed: 8 keh Presigihg Juror Datea: Y/Z0//6 After all verdict forms have been signed, notify the baili present your verdict in the courtroom. that you are ready toVF-304, HP’s Claim that Oracle Breached the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing We answer the questions submitted to us as follows: Did HP do all, or substantially all, of the significant things that the contract required it to do, or was it excused from having to do those things? V_Yes No If your answer to question | is yes, answer question 2, If you answered no, stop bere, answer no farther questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form Did Oracle unfairly interfere with HP’s right to receive the benefits of the contract? Yes No If your answer to question 2 is yes, then answer question 3. If you answered no, stop here, answer no further questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form. Was HP harmed by Oracle’s conduct? Yves No Pres patea: U/B0// After all verdict forms have been signed, notify the bailiff that you are ready to present your verdict in the courtroom.VE. Oracle's *Unclean Hands” Affirmative Defense We answer the qu L. Signed: Que oD: tions submitted to us as follows: Was HP engaged in conduct related to the contract that was wrongful, inequitable, or unconscionable such that HP should be denied relief regardless of the merits of its claim? Yes No If your answer to question 1 is yes, answer question 2. If you answered no, stop here, answer no further questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form. Did the HP conduct from question | cause prejudice to Oracle? Yes No Presiging Juror vlzolieVF-3920. HP"s Claims for Damages What are HP's damag Lost Profits. Enter the amount below if you find that Oracle is liable to HP under HP’s cause of action for breach of contract or HP’s cause of action for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. a, Past lost profits: b. Future lost profits: Signe DwLoey Presigislg pata: G/ZO/1 6 ror TOTAL sh OP7F B s/3/FB 3. YB After all verdict forms have been signed, notify the bailiff that you are ready to present your verdict in the courtroom.VF. Oracle’s Claim that HP Violated the anham Act answer the questions submitted to us as follows: 1 2b. Did HP make a false statement of fact in a commercial advertisement or promotion about its own or another's product? yes _§ Wo If your answer to question 1 is yes, answer question 2a and question 2b. If you answered no, stop here, answer no further questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form, Did the statement actually deceive a substantial segment of its audience? Yes No Did the statement have a tendency to deceive a substantial segment of its audience? Yes No If your answer to either question 2a or question 2b is yes, then answer question 3. If your answer to both question 2a and question 2b is no, stop here, answer no further questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form. Was the deception material, in that it wa purchasing decision? likely to influence the Yes vo If your answer to question 3 is yes, then answer question 4. If you answered no, stop here, answer no further questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form. Did HP cause its false statement to enter interstate commerce? Yes No If your answer to question 4 is yes, then answer question Sa and question 5b. If you answered no, stop here, answer no further questions, and ave the presiding juror sign and date this form.Sa, Has Oracle been injured as a result of the false statement, cither by direct diversion of sales from itself to defendant or by a lessening of the goodwill associated with its products? Sb. Is Oracle likely to be injured as a result of the false statement, either by direct diversion of sales from itself to defendant or by a lessening of the goodwill associated with its products? Yes No If your answer to both questions Sa and question $b is no, stop here, answer no further questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form. 6 *s damages? a, Past lost profit Se b. Future lost profits: s TOTAL Signed: Dueoe2¥ 2 Presidjhg Juror patea: U/Z0//6 After all verdict forms have been signed, notily the bai present your verdict in the courtroom. iff that you are ready to