Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Smith, A.F.C.C.A. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views1 page
    The United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and sentence of Airman Basic Chad E. Smith, who was tried by a special court-martial convened at Keesler Air Force Base, Mississippi. Smith was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 90 days, which was approved by the convening authority. The appellate court found the approved findings and sentence to be correct in law and fact, and that no error materially prejudiced Smith's substantial rights.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-07-08 Precedential Status: Precedential Docket: ACM S32175

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and sentence of Airman Basic Chad E. Smith, who was tried by a special court-martial convened at Keesler Air Force Base, Mississippi. Smith was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 90 days, which was approved by the convening authority. The appellate court found the approved findings and sentence to be correct in law and fact, and that no error materially prejudiced Smith's substantial rights.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views1 page

    United States v. Smith, A.F.C.C.A. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and sentence of Airman Basic Chad E. Smith, who was tried by a special court-martial convened at Keesler Air Force Base, Mississippi. Smith was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 90 days, which was approved by the convening authority. The appellate court found the approved findings and sentence to be correct in law and fact, and that no error materially prejudiced Smith's substantial rights.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

    UNITED STATES
    v.
    Airman Basic CHAD E. SMITH
    United States Air Force
    ACM S32175
    8 July 2014
    Sentence adjudged 27 Aug 2013 by SPCM convened at Keesler Air Force
    Base, Mississippi. Military Judge: Shaun Speranza (sitting alone).
    Approved Sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 90 days.
    Appellate Counsel for the Appellant: Captain Michael A. Schrama.
    Appellate Counsel for the United States: Colonel Don M. Christensen;
    Major Daniel J. Breen; and Gerald R. Bruce, Esquire.
    Before
    ALLRED, MITCHELL, and WEBER
    Appellate Military Judges
    This opinion is subject to editorial correction before final release.

    PER CURIAM:
    The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error
    materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant occurred. Article 66(c),
    UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. 866(c); United States v. Reed, 54 M.J. 37, 41 (C.A.A.F. 2000).
    Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
    FOR THE COURT
    LEAH M. CALAHAN
    Deputy Clerk of the Court

    You might also like