You are on page 1of 54

Advanced Manufacturing Systems

Design
2000 John W. Nazemetz
Concurrent
Engineering

Lecture 3 Topic :

Introduction to
Simultaneous and Asynchronous
Engineering
Segment A Topic:

ADVANCED
MANUFACTURING
SYSTEMS DESIGN
Concurrent Engineering
Introduction to Simultaneous and
Asynchronous Engineering
Activities
Slide 2

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Overview
Concurrent Engineering
Definition
Concepts
New Products
Existing Products

Slide 3

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems
Definition Revisited

Systems which enable the integrated,


rationalized design, development,
implementation, operation and
improvement of production facilities
and their output over the life cycle of
the product. These systems identify and
use appropriate technology to achieve
their goals at minimum cost and effort.
Slide 4

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Concurrent Engineering -Definition


Concurrent Engineering is a systematic
approach to the integrated, concurrent
design of products and their related
processes, including manufacturing and
support. This approach is intended to
cause the developers, from the outset,
to consider all elements of the product
life cycle from conception to disposal,
including quality, cost, schedule, and
user requirements. (Pennell and Winner,
1989)

Slide 5

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Concurrent Engineering Definition Problems


Name Implies only Engineering Involved
Activity is Really Concurrent (DESIGN)
CONCEPTUALIZATION and EVALUATION
(ENGINEERING)
Require Broad View of Design
Must Assure that Correct Concepts Are
Incorporated into the Design
Must Assure that Principles of
Engineering/Nature are Followed
Slide 6

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Goals of Concurrent
Engineering in CIM (1)
Primary Goal is to Assure
Rationalization in Early Stages to Avoid
Cost/Improve Product

Slide 7

Operational Concept
Physical Concept
Manufacturing Concept
Maintenance Concept
Disposal Concept

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Goals of Concurrent
Engineering in CIM (2)
Secondary Goal is Lead Time Reduction
Administrative Lead Time
Design and Rationalization of Product
Approval and Acquisition of Facilities

Manufacturing Lead Time


Scheduling and Execution
Storage and Distribution
Measure of Exposure to Risk/Changes

Slide 8

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Traditional Process of
Serial Engineering

Functions Separated
Functions Serially Executed
No Interaction
Maintenance Usually an Afterthought
Time Consuming
Costly
Product a Series of Suboptimal
Reconsiderations

Slide 9

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Serial Engineering
SUPPORT??

DESIGN
Slide 10

MANUFACTURING
PLANNING

MANUFACTURING

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

CUSTOMER
2000 John W. Nazemetz

Concurrent vs. Serial


Engineering

All Viewpoints Solicited


Interdisciplinary Teams
Life Cycle Cost Considered
Attempt to Embody Concept Early Before Committing to Detail Design
Data/Information/Knowledge Exchange
Planned and Encouraged
Cycle Time and Cost Reduced
Slide 11

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

A Concurrent Engineering
Model
PRODUCT
FUNCTIONAL
CONCEPT
PRODUCT
MANUFACTURING
CONCEPT

DISCIPLINE INPUTS
ENGINEERING

CONCURRENT
DESIGN

PRODUCTION
CUSTOMERS
WORKERS

PRODUCT
MAINTENENCE
CONCEPT

Slide 12

MARKETING

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Virtual Concurrent
Engineering
Always a Virtual Endeavor
Groups Are Always Geographically (and
Culturally) Distributed
How Far is Too Far Apart?

Information Generated/Stored in Various


Formats and Locations
Single Plant + Customers
Multiple Plants (Same Organization) + Customers
Multiple Organizations + Customers

Slide 13

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Keys to Concurrent
Engineering
Supportive Culture
Clear Understanding and
Documentation of Requirements
Technical Competence/Experiences
Technical Tool Availability (CAx Tools)
Communication Competence
Communication and Information Tool
Availability
Slide 14

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Advanced Manufacturing Systems


Design
2000 John W. Nazemetz

Concurrent
Engineering
Segment A Topic: Introduction to
Simultaneous and Asynchronous
Engineering
Lecture 3 Topic :

END OF SEGMENT

Advanced Manufacturing Systems


Design
2000 John W. Nazemetz
Concurrent
Engineering

Lecture 3 Topic :

Computer Aided
Process Planning

Segment B Topic:

Overview
Computer Aided Process Planning
The Use of Computer To Develop and
Analyze Alternative Manufacturing
Processes

Part of Design

Slide 17

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Computer Aided Process


Planning
Definition
Use of computer and information
technologies to assist in the cost effective
development and assessment of alternative
methods of production and sequences for a
specific product specification and
identification of areas for potential
improvement in specifications from the
process/manufacturing viewpoint.

Slide 18

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Manufacturing Processes

Casting and Molding Processes


Forming Processes
Chip Formation Processes
Finishing Processes
Small Chip Removal Processes
Treatment (Mechanical and Chemical)
Processes
Coating Processes

Slide 19

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Manufacturing Process
Review
How To Determine Process/Cost
Process To Be Used (Shape)
Process Ability to Hold Dimensional
Tolerance
Surface Finish (How Determined)
Set Up Times
Machining Parameter
Selection/Specification
Part Processing Times
Cost Optimization
Slide 20

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Knowledge Requirements
for Process Planning
Manufacturing Processes/Capabilities
Design Specification/Process
Interaction
Machine Tool Options/Capabilities
Tool and Tooling Options
Capacity Availability
Real and Accounting Costs of
Manufacture
Cost - Volume Life Cycle Relationships
Computer Integrated
Slide 21
2000 John W. Nazemetz
Manufacturing Systems
Actual Floor Operations

Types of Process Planning


Manual Process Planning
Variant Process Planning
Existing Plan Retrieval
Composite (Master) Part Plans

Generative Process Planning


Computer Generated Process Plans
Use of Artificial Intelligence

Slide 22

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Manual Process Planning

Study Design and Specifications


Recall Past Relevant Experiences
Discuss Tight Specifications
Develop Alternative Process Sequences
Specification/Capabilities
Volume/Tooling/Cost Requirements
Capacity Availability

Select and Document Best Process


Implement and Monitor
Slide 23

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Manual Process Planning Drawbacks


Completely Dependant on Experience of
Process Planner
Number of Alternatives Generated
Limited
Relatively Slow Process
Documentation Usually Poor
Incorporation of Past Investment in
Process Design not Assured
Slide 24

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Variant Process Planning


Identify/Find Similar Parts
Compare Existing Parts with Current
Delete Unneeded Part Features in
Retrieved Part
Add Part Features/Process Not in
Retrieved Part
Add New Design into System for Later
Use
Slide 25

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Variant Process Planning Retrieval Systems


System for Associating/Locating Past
Process Plans/Designs Crucial to
Success
Group Technology Based Systems
As Up Front Design Philosophy to Limit Variation
As Key to Access Previous Plans
Part Features

Process Sequence Based Systems


Problem of Pattern Recognition
Slide 26

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Variant Process Planning Composite (Master) Parts


Develop Composite Part
Defines Characteristics of a Class of Parts
Contains all Possible Features that Can Be
Incorporated in the Design of Parts in this
Class
Generally Defined Parametrically
Not All CAD Systems Support Parametric Features
Manual Intervention Required in Non-Parametric
CAD Systems

Generally Assumes Infinite Capacity


Slide 27

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Variant Process Planning Drawbacks


New Process Plan is Generally No Better
Than Retrieved Design
Use of Archived Plan Does Not Always
Reflect Current Situation
Part Family Formation is Natural
Fallout
No New Technologies are Considered in
Planning
Slide 28

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Generative Process Planning


Part Specification (CAD Model)
Recognize Part Features From CAD
Model
Generate Feasible Methods for
Production of Part Features
Evaluate Operational Feasibility
Evaluate Economics of Alternatives
Specify Process
Regenerate Each Time Part is Produced
Slide 29

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Generative Process
Planning (2)
Part Specification (CAD Model)
Must Conform to Standard
Current Standards not Unambiguous

Recognize Part Features From CAD


Model

Slide 30

Lines, Arcs => Surfaces


Surfaces => Part Features
Part Features Have Specifications
Recognize Relations Between Part Features
Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Generative Process
Planning (3)
Generate Feasible Methods for
Production of Part Features
All Technically Feasible Methods Considered
Alternate Sequences Considered

Evaluate Operational Feasibility


Map Technically Feasible Methods Against
Those Available to Company
Subcontracting Difficult to Incorporate
Tooling Difficult to Incorporate
Slide 31

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Generative Process
Planning (4)
Evaluate Economics of Alternatives
For this Part
For this Part and Existing Similar Parts
For this Part, Existing, and Contemplated
Parts

Specify Process
Regenerate Each Time Part is Produced
Incorporates Temporal Information
Increased Variation ???
Slide 32

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Generative Process
Planning - Drawbacks
Part Feature Recognition is Not a
Mature Technology
CAD Model Data Exchange (Precision,
Format)
May Depend on Missing Material

Expensive (Artificial Intelligence)


Must Be Tailored to Specific Firm
Incorporation of Proprietary Processes
Difficult
Slide 33

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Advanced Manufacturing Systems


Design
2000 John W. Nazemetz
Concurrent
Engineering

Lecture 3 Topic :

Computer Aided
Process Planning
END OF SEGMENT

Segment B Topic:

Advanced Manufacturing Systems


Design
2000 John W. Nazemetz

Concurrent
Engineering

Lecture 3 Topic :

Segment C Topic:

Quantitative Analysis

ADVANCED
MANUFACTURING
SYSTEMS DESIGN
Concurrent Engineering
Quantitative Analysis

Slide 36

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Overview
Quantitative Analysis in Concurrent
Engineering
Singhs Mathematical Model
Uses Manufacturing Method/Process
Capabilities, Tolerance Limits, Input and
Processing Costs, and Time Estimates to
Compare Alternatives
Source: Singh, Nanua, Systems Approach to Computer
Integrated Design and Manufacturing, John Wiley and
Sons, Inc., New York, New York, c1995
Slide 37

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Singhs Quantitative
Analysis (Eq. 4.1, 4.2)
Tolerance
Alternatives and
Process Capabilities
Standard Normal
Variate of upper
Tolerance
Standard Normal
Variate of lower
Tolerance

Slide 38

t
t

u
k

l
k

j
j

Z ujk
Z ljk

t = tolerance limit
k= tolerance system (design alt.)
j= machining system

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Singhs Quantitative
Analysis (Eq. 4.3)
i
jk

o
jk

Y ,Y ,Y

s
jk

output, input, scrap units

SCrap Fraction

SC
Slide 39

jk

Y
Y

s
jk
i
jk

( Z ) [1 ( Z )]
l
jk

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

u
jk

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Singhs Quantitative
Analysis (Eq. 4.4)
i
jk

o
jk

Y ,Y ,Y

s
jk

output, input, scrap units

Mass Balance

Y Y Y
i
jk

Slide 40

o
jk

s
jk

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Singhs Quantitative
Analysis (Eq. 4.5, 4.6)
i
jk

o
jk

Y ,Y ,Y

s
jk

output, input, scrap units

Technological Coefficients (input per


unit of output, scrap per unit of output)

k
i
jk

Slide 41

Y
Y

i
jk
o
jk

k
s
jk

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

Y
Y

s
jk
o
jk

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Singhs Quantitative
Analysis (Eq. 4.7)
Combining (Percent Acceptable in
Output Stream)

k
s
jk

Y
Y

s
jk
o
jk

i
jk

SC jk
1 SC jk
o
jk

Y ,Y ,Y
Slide 42

s
jk

( Z ) [1 ( Z )]
l
jk

u
jk

( Z ) ( Z )
u
jk

l
jk

output, input, scrap units

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Singhs Quantitative
Analysis (Eq. 4.8)
Combining (Ratio of Input to Output
Obtained Will be >1)

i
jk
o
jk

1
k
1 k
u
l
Y
( Z jk ) ( Z jk )
i
jk

i
jk

s
jk

o
jk

Y ,Y ,Y
Slide 43

s
jk

output, input, scrap units

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Singhs Quantitative
Analysis (Eq. 4.4, 4.9, 4.10)
Combining to Reform Material Balance
Equations

Y Y Y
i
jk

o
jk

i
jk

o
jk

Y ,Y ,Y
Slide 44

s
jk

s
jk

Y k Y

o
jk

Y k Y

o
jk

s
jk
i
jk

s
jk

i
jk

output, input, scrap units


Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Singhs Quantitative
Analysis (Eq. 4.11)
Cost Equation (Cost of Output and Scrap
= Cost of Input and Processing

X Y X Y X Y Y f (Y )
o
jk

o
jk

s
jk

s
jk

X ,X ,X
i
jk

o
jk

s
jk

f (Y )
i
jk

Slide 45

i
jk

i
jk

i
jk

i
jk

Unit Cost of input, output,scrap


Processing Cost per Unit

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Singhs Quantitative
Analysis (Eq. 4.11)
Dividing by

o
to get output cost/unit
jk

X Y X Y
o
jk

o
jk

s
jk

Y
X
Slide 46

o
jk

s
jk

o
jk

Y
Y

i
jk
o
jk

X
i
jk

X Y Y f (Y )
i
jk

i
jk

i
jk

Y
Y
Y

s
jk
o
jk

o
jk

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

s
jk

i
jk

Y
Y

i
jk
o
jk

fY

i
jk

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Singhs Quantitative
Analysis (Eq. 4.12)
Or, by substituting technological
factors, unit cost of output (good units)

Slide 47

o
jk

k X k X k f (Y )
i
jk

i
jk

s
jk

s
jk

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

i
jk

i
jk

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Singhs Quantitative
Analysis (Eq. 4.13)
Developing an expression for
Manufacturing Lead Time:

Tj S j t j k Y
i
jk

o
jk

t j Processing time, j th method


S j Set-up Time

Slide 48

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Using Singhs Quantitative


Analysis
Given a Set of Production Methods

With Process Capabilities,


Unit Production Cost Estimates,
Unit Production Time Estimates, and
Set up Times

and a Set of Precision Alternatives,


Assuming Precision is Relevant to Customer
Definition of Quality

Then, Quantitative Assessment Possible.


Slide 49

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Problems with Singh


Quantification (1)
Product Manufacturing Centric
Viewpoint
No Design Cost Data
No Service/Maintenance Cost Data
No Value to Increase/Decrease in Lead Time
No Administrative Lead Time Factor
No Material/Capacity Lead Time

Slide 50

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Problems with Singh


Quantification (2)
Product Manufacturing Centric
Viewpoint
Scrap Defined by Designer, not Customer,
no Customer Definition of Quality
No Differential Cost Savings/Cost (Serial vs.
Concurrent)

NOT AN ANALYSIS OF CONCURRENT


ENGINEERING !!! -- IT IS A
DESIGN/PROCESS COMPARISION
METHOD
Slide 51

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Benefits of Quantification
Forces Focus upon Measurable Factors
To Extent These are the Right Factors,
Drives Organizations Direction

Shows Changes/Provides Basis for


Comparison of Alternatives

Slide 52

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Concurrent ReEngineering
of Products
No Real Difference in Organization and
Process Execution
Only Change is Inclusion of Existing
Plant and Facilities

Cost (Current) Known, Not Estimated

Slide 53

Computer Integrated
Manufacturing Systems

2000 John W. Nazemetz

Advanced Manufacturing Systems


Design
2000 John W. Nazemetz
Concurrent
Engineering

Lecture 3 Topic :

Segment C Topic:

Quantitative Analysis

END OF SEGMENT

You might also like