You are on page 1of 1

456 F.

2d 687

Dolores June Thompson WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,


v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 71-1709.

United States Court of Appeals,


Tenth Circuit.
Feb. 25, 1972.

Before LEWIS, Chief Judge, and McWILLIAMS and BARRETT, Circuit


Judges.
PER CURIAM.

The initial review of this case prompted its assignment to the summary
calendar. We informed the appellant, Dolores Wilson, and her attorney, that we
were contemplating summary affirmance on our own motion and afforded her
an opportunity to submit a memorandum addressing the underlying merits. See
Rule 8(d), Revised Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth
Circuit (1970).

A memorandum has not been received. Nevertheless, we have now carefully


reviewed the files and records in this case and are thoroughly convinced that
the judgment of the district court is correct. The findings are more than amply
supported by the evidence, as a reading of the transcript readily discloses.
Concluding that there is no need for further argument, the judgment is affirmed
for the reasons stated by the district court in 339 F.Supp. 126 (W.D.Okl.1971).

Affirmed.

You might also like