Professional Documents
Culture Documents
New Microsoft Word 文档 PDF
New Microsoft Word 文档 PDF
Job satisfaction is a specific attitude that indicates the degree to which individuals feel
positively or negatively about their jobs. It is an emotional response to ones tasks as
well as to the physical and social conditions of the workplace. Often, job satisfaction is
measured in terms of feelings about various job facets, including the
work, pay, promotion, coworkers and supervision. Job satisfaction is related to
employee absenteeism and turnover, but the relationship to performance is
controversial. Current organisational behaviour thinking rejects the notion that
satisfaction causes performance, and instead argues that rewards influence both
satisfaction and performance.
The perceptual process
Individuals use the perceptual process to select, organise, interpret and retrieve
information from their environment. Perceptions are influenced by a variety of
factors, including social and physical aspects of the situation as well as personal factors
such as needs, experience, values, attitudes and personality. A manager who is skilled
in influencing the perceptual process will be able to see a situation as it is perceived by
other people and avoid common perceptual distortions that may bias his or her views
of people and situations. In addition, managers must avoid stereotyping as this can have
social and legal implications.
Summary3
Motivating and empowering todays workforce
In the contemporary world, a key challenge is to motivate and empower workers
towards productive performance. With an ageing population, when there are labour
shortages and with mobile workforces, organisations need to understand how to
motivate and empower employees in order to attract and retain them and to enhance
performance.
Difference between content and process motivation theories
There are two main types of motivational theories content and process. Content
theories examine the needs that individuals have. Their efforts to satisfy those needs
are what drive their behaviour. Process theories examine the thought processes that
people have in relation to motivating their behaviour.
Content theories of motivation
The content theories of Maslow, Alderfer, McClelland and Herzberg emphasise needs
or motives. They are often criticised for being culturally biased, and caution should be
exercised when applying these theories in non-Western cultures.
Maslows hierarchy of needs theory arranges human needs into a five-step hierarchy:
physiological, safety, social (the three lower-order needs), esteem and selfactualisation (the two higher-order needs). Satisfaction of any need activates the need
at the next higher level, and people are presumed to move step by step up the hierarchy.
Alderfers ERG theory has modified this theory by collapsing the five needs into three:
existence, relatedness and growth. Alderfer also allows for more than one need to be
activated at a time and for a frustrationregression response. McClellands acquired
needs theory focuses on the needs for achievement(nAch), affiliation (nAff) and
power (nPower). The theory argues that these needs can be developed through
experience and training. Persons high in nAch prefer jobs with individual
responsibility, performance feedback and moderately challenging goals. Successful
executives typically have a high nPower that is greater than their nAff. Herzbergs twofactor theory treats job satisfaction and job dissatisfaction as two separate issues.
Satisfiers, or motivator factors such as achievement,responsibility and recognition, are
associated with job content. An improvement in job content is expected to increase
satisfaction and motivation to perform well. In contrast, dissatisfiers, or hygiene factors
such as working conditions, relations with coworkers and salary, are associated with
the job context. Improving job context does not lead to more satisfaction but is expected
to reduce dissatisfaction.
Process theories of motivation
Process theories emphasise the thought processes concerning how and why people
choose one action over another in the workplace. Process theories focus on
understanding the cognitive processes that act to influence behaviour. Although process
theories can be very useful in explaining work motivation in cross-cultural settings, the
values that drive such theories may vary substantially across cultures and the outcomes
may differ considerably.
Equity theory points out that people compare their rewards (and inputs) with those of
others. The individual is then motivated to engage in behaviour to correct any perceived
inequity. At the extreme, feelings of inequity may lead to reduced performance or job
turnover. Expectancy theory argues that work motivation is determined by an
individuals beliefs concerning effortperformance relationships (expectancy), work
outcome relationships (instrumentality) and the desirability of various work
outcomes (valence).
Managers, therefore, must
build
positive
expectancies, demonstrate performance-reward instrumentalities, and use rewards with
high positive valences in their motivational strategies.
Integrating content and process motivation theories
The content theories can be compared, with some overlap identified. An integrated
model of motivation builds from the individual performance equation developed in
chapter 2 and combines the content and process theories to show how well-managed
rewards can lead to high levels of both individual performance and satisfaction.
Other perspectives on motivation
Other theories go beyond content and process theories to draw links with personality
theory, leadership, individual values, self-concept and self-efficacy. Such theories tend
to place a lot of emphasis on leader responsibility for motivation and on the complexity
of motivation. Theories that focus on self-concept and personal values seek to describe
stress. The compressed work week allows full-time work to be completed in less than
five days. Flexible working hours allow employees a daily choice in timing work and
non-work activities. Job sharing occurs when two or more people divide one full-time
job according to an agreement among themselves and the employer. Flexiyear, annual
hours, job sharing and V-Time are all designed to enable workers to balance the
competing demands on their time of work, leisure and education. These flexible work
arrangements are becoming more important as a way of obtaining the services of an
increasingly diverse workforce requiring a family-friendly workplace in our rapidly
changing society. Information and communication technologies have had a significant
impact on organisational design. The capabilities of this technology and lessening costs
mean that the technology can often be taken with the worker, or to the worker. This
enables workers to work remotely when they are travelling to and from their homes.
Such teleworking allows work to be conducted remotely from the central organisation
using information technology. These methods have several potential
benefits, especially for those with child-care or other care duties, or for those with
physical disabilities. For all employees it can involve reductions in employee
expenditure on travel to work, lunches and work clothes, as well as saving on time. The
potential costs are increased isolation of employees, and poorer communication and
knowledge sharing, as well as costs like insurance and establishment of home offices.
Data confidentiality and security and local government zoning laws can also present
potential problems.
Summary
Groups and types of groups
A group is formally defined as a collection of people who interact with one another
regularly to attain common goals. Groups in organisations fall into two major categories.
Formal groups are official groups work units, task forces, committees and so on
that are created by a formal authority to achieve a specific purpose. Many such groups
can be identified on organisation charts. Informal groups are unofficial. They emerge
spontaneously and are not designated by the organisation to serve any purpose. They
may work for or against organisational needs, but tend to satisfy important individual
needs.
How groups meet individual and organisational needs
One way to view an organisation is as an interlocking network of groups. From this
perspective, the results accomplished by each group should add up in building-block
fashion to fulfil organisational needs for task accomplishment. Any group offers the
potential to satisfy important individual needs for social interaction, security and so on.
Managing for group effectiveness
Group effectiveness occurs when groups are able to achieve high levels of both task
performance and human resource maintenance. Within groups, synergy occurs when a
group is able to accomplish more than its members would accomplish individually.
However, disruptive or negative behaviours such as social loafing (when individual
members do not work as hard as they might otherwise) sometimes occur. Groups can
be viewed as open systems interacting with their environments. Group effectiveness
involves success in transforming a variety of inputs to the group (such as organisational
setting, nature of the task, group membership characteristics and size) into group
outputs (task performance and human resource maintenance) through the group process.
The group processes or group dynamics represent the internal processes of the group.
Group inputs and effectiveness
The foundations of group effectiveness begin with the presence of the right inputs.
Group input factors set the stage for group action. Among the inputs of special
managerial significance is the organisational setting, including available operating
resources, spatial arrangements, technologies, rewards and goal systems,cultures and
structures. Other important inputs are the nature of the task; general membership
characteristics such as member compatibilities and homogeneity or
heterogeneity; status; and group size. Optimum group size depends on the context and
group goals. Highly effective groups use their inputs fully to achieve success.
Group processes and group dynamics
Group dynamics are the forces operating within groups that affect task performance and
human resource maintenance. They are the internal processes through which members
work together to accomplish the transformation of group inputs into group outputs. The
terms group dynamics and group processes are often used interchangeably. The
behaviours within groups may be required or they may be emergent, additional
behaviours. All groups pass through various stages in their life cycles. Five different
stages of group development pose somewhat distinct management problems. Groups in
the forming stage have problems managing individual entry. The storming stage
introduces problems of managing expectations and status. Groups in the initial
integration stage have problems managing member relations and task efforts. Groups
in the total integration stage encounter problems managing continual improvement and
self-renewal. Groups in the adjourning stage have problems managing task completion
and the process of disbanding. Group norms or standards of behaviour will impact upon
the behaviour of all group members. Group roles relating to particular positions in the
group describe the expected behaviours for individuals in those roles. Emotions and
patterns of communication and decision making are also elements of group dynamics.
Groups task and maintenance outputs
Groups have two broad sets of needs that must be met if they are to operate successfully.
First, group members contribute a variety of task activities, such as initiating and
summarising, that make direct contributions to the groups task performance.
Second, group members must contribute to the fulfilment of maintenance needs. These
include other activities, such as encouraging and gatekeeping, that specifically help to
maintain the social fabric of the group over time. Both task activities and maintenance
activities must be accomplished in any group. The principle of distributed leadership
points out these activities can and should be provided, as needed, by all group
members, not just by those formally designated as leaders. Groups are capable of
providing many advantages to organisations but can also result in disadvantages.
Intergroup dynamics
Intergroup dynamics are the forces that operate between two or more groups. Although
groups are supposed to cooperate in organisations, things do not always work this way.
Groups can become involved in dysfunctional conflicts and competition.
Sometimes, the origins of these conflicts lie in work flow interdependencies; at other
times, the origins can be traced to differing group characteristics. Variables including
status, time and goal orientations, reward systems and resource availabilities can all
make a difference in the way groups work together. Managers must be aware of the
potential for problems in intergroup relations and know how to deal with them, even as
they recognise some competition can be good. The disadvantages of intergroup
competition can be reduced through management strategies to direct, train and reinforce
groups to pursue cooperative actions instead of purely competitive actions.