CONFIDENTIAL

Samsung Research Institute of Construction Technology

Samsung C&T

Documentation No.
Edition No.
Date
Prepared by
Verified by
Approved by

SICT-2015-SIP-01-000200
2
2015/03/05 - 2015/06/08
SBK & JKS
HCK

(, 2009).

1)
-
-
2)
-
-
3) Risk Analysis
-
-
-

Table 1
(, 2006).

Table 1:

H.W.L.

EL.(+) 13.41 m

N.W.L.

EL.(+) 2.73 m
6.3 - 6.8 m

2.25 m/ sec

Fig. 1 ,
8 knot (, 2009).

Figure 1: (, 2009)

Fig. 2 (,

2009).

(a) 400 m

(b) 980 m ( 320 m)

Figure 2: (, 2009)
(, 2006).

Figure 3: (, 2006)

.

( ) (AASHTO, 1991).

3.1

= [|] [|] []
= ( )

(1)
(2)

: , ,

3.2

10 4 , 10 3
.

Table 2:

3.3

10 4

= 1.0
= 1.0 10 3

= 1.0 10 4

( )

. ,

. ,
. (2006) .

Table 3:
*

[m]

[m]

Gross Tonnage (GT)

Mean

Max

(, 2015)

1358

66

13.8

274

365

700

60

10.6

274

365

430

56.54

11

192

383

302

56.54

11

192

383

277

37.61

192

383

247

37.61

192

383

125

29.18

7.06

192

383

59

20

192

383

1540 (DWT)

60

10.7

105

183

(, 2015)

*:
GT (Gross Tonnage) DWT(DeadWeight Tonnage, )
Takahashi et al. (June 2006) .

3.4

= ( )
,

3.4.1

(3)

( )

Table 4: ( )

= 0.6

10 4

= 1.2 10 4

3.4.2 ( )
.
17 , 18 .
1 ,
(910 m )
(, 2014).

= 1 +

3.4.3

90

(4)

( )
.

= 1 +

19[ km/ hr]

(5)

3.4.4

( )
.

(6)

= 1 + 0.54

3.4.5

( )
.

Table 5: ( )

3.4.6

1.0
1.3
1.6

( )

1,000 DWT
, (PA) .
.
( )
, LOA()
.
.
Probability Density

3.5

10 -3

6
4
2
0
-200

P10
-150

-100

P11
-50

50

100

150

Ship Lane [m]

Figure 4:

200

0.15

PG

0.1

0.05

Figure 5: (PG)
3.6

( )

3.6.1

,
, , LOA

3 (AASHTO, 1991).
.
4

V [m/s]

3
2
1
0

Figure 6:
3.6.2

Kunz (1998) ,
10 .

0.4

Relative Probability

Relative Probability

(COWI, 2006; Kunz, 1998).

0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0

20

40

60

Impact Angle [o ]

(a) Pier 10

Figure 7: ( )

80

100

Impact Angle [o ]

(b) Pier 11

120

140

160

180

(, 2006)

= 120 DWT [ kN]

(7)

400

300

200

100

0
0

10

15

20

25

30

10

15

20

25

30

400

300

200

100

(a) Pier 10
Figure 8: ( )

(AASHTO, 1991; , 2006)
15000

P [kN]

3.6.3

10000

5000

Figure 9:

3.6.4

P10 , P11 ()
.
PM . ,
.
. ,
.

Table 6:
[kN]
a

P10 Caisson

P10 Pier

P11 Caisson

P11 Pier

46,000

12,000

270,000

20,000a

, PM (20,000 - 80,000

kN) 20,000 kN

3.6.5

( ) ( ) ( )
.

{
0.0 / < 0.1,
{
{
{
0.1 / < 1.0,
{
{
{
{ 1.0 /,

3.6.6

= 0.1 + 9 (0.1
= 0.111 (1.0

(8)

= 0.0

0.007939 10 4 , (1

10 4 ) .

,
,

10

. .
P10 , P11

() . ,
, .
0.007939 10 4 , (1

10 4 ) .
, ,
.

11

References
AASHTO, 1991. Guide Specification and commentary for vessel collision design of highway
bridges.
COWI, 2006. Incheon bridge project, design package no. 11, ship impact protection. Tech.
Rep. DSN-11-SIP-NCR(EK), Samsung JV.
Kunz, C. U., 1998. Ship bridge collision in river traffic analysis and design practice. In: Gluver, Olsen (Eds.), Ship Collision Analysis. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 1322.
Takahashi, H., Goto, A., Abe, M., June 2006. Study on standards for main dimensions of the
design ship. Tech. Rep. 309.
, 2006. .
, 2009. . Tech. Rep. 2009.
, 2006. . Tech. rep.
, 2009. . Tech. rep., JV.
, 2015. . h t t p : / / w w w . e l a n d c r u i s e . c o m / I n f o r m a t i o n /
Schedule.aspx.

, 2014. () -.
, 2015. . h t t p : / / w w w . a r a c r u i s e . c o m / k o r / m a i n / m a i n .
asp.