Manuelito Isabelo Jr., a student government officer at Perpetual Help College of Rizal, refused to sign a resolution approving a 20% tuition fee increase without consulting fellow students. After he signed with assurances that student requests would be granted, the college removed him from the student roll for the next year for not meeting requirements. The Supreme Court case examined whether the college could invoke academic freedom to drop students for their actions. While academic freedom is important, it is not unlimited and must be exercised responsibly. The case was remanded to the Department of Education for further review.
Manuelito Isabelo Jr., a student government officer at Perpetual Help College of Rizal, refused to sign a resolution approving a 20% tuition fee increase without consulting fellow students. After he signed with assurances that student requests would be granted, the college removed him from the student roll for the next year for not meeting requirements. The Supreme Court case examined whether the college could invoke academic freedom to drop students for their actions. While academic freedom is important, it is not unlimited and must be exercised responsibly. The case was remanded to the Department of Education for further review.
Manuelito Isabelo Jr., a student government officer at Perpetual Help College of Rizal, refused to sign a resolution approving a 20% tuition fee increase without consulting fellow students. After he signed with assurances that student requests would be granted, the college removed him from the student roll for the next year for not meeting requirements. The Supreme Court case examined whether the college could invoke academic freedom to drop students for their actions. While academic freedom is important, it is not unlimited and must be exercised responsibly. The case was remanded to the Department of Education for further review.
Academic Freedom (Art. XIV Sec.5[2] 1987 Constitution)
Isabelo, Jr. vs. Perpetual Help College of Rizal Facts: Manuelito Isabelo, Jr. is a senior graduating student of Criminology at Perpetual Help College of Rizal (PHCR). He was then elected as Public Relations Officer (P.R.O) of the Supreme Student Government sometime in August 1990. Then on 08 May 1991, he was invited to attend a meeting with PHCR officials. Said meeting, among other things, intended to implement a 20% tuition fee increase starting the school year 1991-1992. Manuelito refused to sign the resolution instead asked for a 2-week period to take on the matter with fellow officers. Then during the said meeting, the student council present a 9-point proposal. With an assurance that the request proposal would be granted, he finally signed the resolution. Then upon filing for motion for reconsideration of the Student Government to the DECS (Department of Education, Culture and Sports) the tuitionfee increase and granting the motion thereof, Manuelito was one of the students that has been dropped from the list of students of 1991-1992 on the account that he does not comply all of the requirements of the college. Issue: Whether or not PHCR can invoke Academic Freedom in dropping the petitioners from its roll of students. Held: Like any other right, however, academic freedom has never been meant to be an unabridged license. It is a privilege that assumes a correlative duty to exercise it responsibly. The case was remanded to DECS.