Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Jesse James Quinn and Reginald L. Kelsey, 447 F.2d 989, 10th Cir. (1971)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views1 page
    Two defendants, Jesse James Quinn and Reginald L. Kelsey, were convicted of armed robbery of a federally insured bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d). They appealed their convictions, claiming there was insufficient evidence to support the judgments. In a per curiam opinion, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions, finding that the record amply supported the verdicts based on its review of the entire case record.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1971-10-01 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 447 F.2d 989 Docket: 71-1148

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Two defendants, Jesse James Quinn and Reginald L. Kelsey, were convicted of armed robbery of a federally insured bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d). They appealed their convictions, claiming there was insufficient evidence to support the judgments. In a per curiam opinion, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions, finding that the record amply supported the verdicts based on its review of the entire case record.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views1 page

    United States v. Jesse James Quinn and Reginald L. Kelsey, 447 F.2d 989, 10th Cir. (1971)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Two defendants, Jesse James Quinn and Reginald L. Kelsey, were convicted of armed robbery of a federally insured bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d). They appealed their convictions, claiming there was insufficient evidence to support the judgments. In a per curiam opinion, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions, finding that the record amply supported the verdicts based on its review of the entire case record.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    447 F.

    2d 989

    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,


    v.
    Jesse James QUINN and Reginald L. Kelsey, DefendantsAppellants.
    No. 71-1148.
    No. 71-1147.

    United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.


    October 1, 1971.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas;
    Frank G. Theis, Judge.
    Glen S. Kelly, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Robert J. Roth, U. S. Atty., with him on
    the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.
    Paul B. Swartz, Denver, Colo., for defendants-appellants.
    Before LEWIS, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and BARRETT, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM.

    Defendants were convicted of violations of 18 U.S.C. 2113(a) and (d), armed


    robbery of a federally insured bank. They appeal, presenting as the sole
    appellate issue the claim that the judgments are not supported by sufficient
    evidence. After review of the entire record we conclude the claims are without
    merit. The record amply supports the verdicts and judgments.

    Affirmed.

    You might also like