Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It summarizes that the trial court considered issues in the case of Kalish v. Hosier et al. and decided them adversely to Kalish in an exhaustive and well-reasoned opinion. The Court of Appeals is in full agreement with the trial court's opinion and affirms the judgment.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1966-08-11 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 364 F.2d 829 Docket: 8699_1

    Original Title

    Hyman Kalish v. Harold A. Hosier, I. M. Rosenblatt, Wallace J. Axelson, W. C. King, Jr., Denver Mailers Union Number 8 Local of the International Mailers Union, and the International Mailers Union, 364 F.2d 829, 10th Cir. (1966)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It summarizes that the trial court considered issues in the case of Kalish v. Hosier et al. and decided them adversely to Kalish in an exhaustive and well-reasoned opinion. The Court of Appeals is in full agreement with the trial court's opinion and affirms the judgment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views1 page

    United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It summarizes that the trial court considered issues in the case of Kalish v. Hosier et al. and decided them adversely to Kalish in an exhaustive and well-reasoned opinion. The Court of Appeals is in full agreement with the trial court's opinion and affirms the judgment.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    364 F.

    2d 829

    Hyman KALISH, Appellant,


    v.
    Harold A. HOSIER, I. M. Rosenblatt, Wallace J. Axelson, W.
    C. King, Jr., Denver Mailers Union Number 8 Local
    of the International Mailers Union, and
    the International Mailers
    Union, Appellees.
    No. 8699.

    United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.


    Aug. 11, 1966.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado;
    Alfred A. Arraj, Judge.
    Milnor H. Senior, Denver, Colo., for appellant.
    Philip Hornbein, Jr., Denver, Colo. (Edward J. Fillenwarth, Indianapolis,
    (Ind., on the brief), for appellees.
    Before PHILLIPS, LEWIS and HILL, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM.

    Issues, a decision of which will be dispositive and determinative of this appeal,


    were considered and decided adversely to Kalish by the trial court below in an
    exhaustive and well reasoned opinion, Kalish v. Hosier et al., D.C. Colo., 256
    F.Supp. 853. Being in full accord therewith, we adopt it as the opinion of this
    court and affirm the judgment.

    You might also like