Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Thompson v. Limke, 10th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Clinton K. Thompson filed a lawsuit against Ted Limke and Edwin Kimmel in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The Tenth Circuit determined that oral arguments would not help in determining the appeal and ordered the case to be submitted without oral arguments. After reviewing the briefs and record, the Tenth Circuit concluded that the district court did not err in its judgment and affirmed the district court's decision for substantially the same reasons provided by the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-05-27 Precedential Status: Precedential Docket: 96-6231

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Clinton K. Thompson filed a lawsuit against Ted Limke and Edwin Kimmel in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The Tenth Circuit determined that oral arguments would not help in determining the appeal and ordered the case to be submitted without oral arguments. After reviewing the briefs and record, the Tenth Circuit concluded that the district court did not err in its judgment and affirmed the district court's decision for substantially the same reasons provided by the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    Thompson v. Limke, 10th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Clinton K. Thompson filed a lawsuit against Ted Limke and Edwin Kimmel in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The Tenth Circuit determined that oral arguments would not help in determining the appeal and ordered the case to be submitted without oral arguments. After reviewing the briefs and record, the Tenth Circuit concluded that the district court did not err in its judgment and affirmed the district court's decision for substantially the same reasons provided by the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    F I L E D

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

    United States Court of Appeals


    Tenth Circuit

    TENTH CIRCUIT

    MAY 27 1997

    PATRICK FISHER
    Clerk

    CLINTON K. THOMPSON,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    TED LIMKE; EDWIN KIMMEL,

    No. 96-6231
    (D.C. No. 95-CV-1718)
    (Western District of Oklahoma)

    Defendants-Appellees.
    ORDER AND JUDGMENT
    Before PORFILIO, ANDERSON, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.
    After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
    unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this
    appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered
    submitted without oral argument.
    After consideration of the briefs and the record, we conclude the district court did
    not err in its judgment. We therefore AFFIRM substantially for the reasons given by the
    district court.
    ENTERED FOR THE COURT
    John C. Porfilio

    Circuit Judge

    -2-

    You might also like