Professional Documents
Culture Documents
C 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
DOI: 10.1007/s10823-005-9084-6
87
Abstract. As the number of persons aged 65 and older is increasing dramatically in both developed and developing nations of the world, the health and well-being of elders has become a
worldwide public health concern. Although older adults are now found in higher proportions
across all cultures, the biology, behavior, and environment vary tremendously across older
populations. Biomedical research largely follows a reductionist paradigm separating the domains of culture and biology. Even when health is examined in association with culture and
behavior, biomedical researchers largely focus on static unidirectional associations instead of
examining the dynamic multidirectional impact of culture, behavior, and the environment on
physiology and ultimately health. Since aging and the processes of senescence clearly involve
complex interactions among biological, environmental, and cultural domains, anthropologists
with a bio-cultural and evolutionary perspective are well-equipped to study variation in aging
and senescence. While relatively few biological anthropologists have focused their attention
on aging, a growing literature has demonstrated the utility of biocultural approaches to aging.
This paper serves as an introduction to a special issue that highlights the core of the biological
anthropology of aging.
Keywords: bio-cultural, demography, life expectancy, variation
88
GILLIAN H. ICE
89
increases in the near future. This is very rapid population change in comparison to European countries that saw similar increases over the course of
100+ years (Kinsella & Velkoff, 2001). These rapid demographic changes
represent a unique set of circumstances to which individuals, populations,
and nations must adapt. Anthropologists are ideally suited to study the impact
of changing demographics on human cultural and biological variation.
Biomedical research largely follows a reductionist paradigm separating
the domains of culture and biology. Even when health is examined in association with culture and behavior, biomedical researchers largely focus on static
unidirectional associations instead of examining the dynamic multidirectional
impact of culture, behavior, and the environment on physiology and ultimately
health. For example, there have been great efforts within the field of gerontology to describe normal aging, exemplified by the Baltimore Longitudinal
Study on Aging. Overall, gerontology has been limited by focusing primarily
on developed countries. This focus has been further limited by a primary focus
on majority populations within countries. The focus on normal aging gives
the impression that there is one way to age and anything deviant from the typical pattern of European-derived populations is pathological. Furthermore, it
has limited the research questions that have and can be made. We know very
little about the sociocultural, economic, ecological, evolutionary, and genetic
factors that contribute to variation in aging, and very few gerontologists have
examined the interplay of these factors. By setting aging within a cultural
and environmental context, biological anthropologists are in a unique position to add to the complexity of models and ultimately advance the field of
gerontology and geriatric medicine.
The papers in this issue represent the core of the biological anthropology of
aging in that they all examine bio-cultural influences on human variation. They
all intersect the traditional approaches within cultural anthropology with those
employed by biomedical researchers. As such, they demonstrate the potential
of a bio-cultural approach in the study of aging.
References
Anderson, R.N. (1999). United States Life Tables, 1997 (Vol. 47). Hyattsville, Maryland:
National Center for Health Statistics.
Barinaga, G.T. (1991). How long is the human life span? Science 254: 936938.
Cutler, M.G. (1976). Evolution of longevity in primates. Journal of Human Evolution 51:
169202.
Fries, J.F. (1980). Aging, natural death, and the compression of morbidity. New England
Journal of Medicine 303: 130135.
Hoffman, M. A. (1983). On the presumed coeveolution of brain size and longevity in hominids.
Journal of Human Evolution 13: 371376.
90
GILLIAN H. ICE
Ice, G. H. (2003). Biological anthropology of aging: Past, present and future. Collegium
Antropologicum 27: 16.
Kinsella, K. & Velkoff, V.A. (2001). An Aging World: 2001 (No. U.S. Census Bureau, Series
P95/011). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Olshansky, S.J., Carnes, B.A. & Cassel, C. (1990). In search of Methuselah: Estimating the
upper limits to human longevity. Science 250(4981): 634640.
Raleigh, V.S. (1999). Trends in world population: How will the millennium compare with the
past? Human Reproductive Update 5(5): 500505.
United States Census Bureau. (1999). from http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/idbprint.html
Weiss, K.M. (1981). Evolutionary perspectives on human aging. In P.T. Amos & S. Harrel
(eds.), Other Ways of Growing Old. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 2558.
Weiss, K.M. (1984). On the number of members of genus Homo who have ever lived and some
evolutionary interpretations. Human Biology 56: 637649.
Weiss, K.M. (1989). Are known chronic disease related to the human lifespan and its evolutionary interpretations? American Journal of Human Biology 1: 307319.