Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Paul K. Jacques v. TRW, Inc., An Ohio Corporation, 41 F.3d 1516, 10th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views1 page
    1) This document is an order and judgment from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in the case of Paul K. Jacques v. TRW, Inc. 2) The district court had granted TRW's motion for relief from judgment and motion for summary judgment, which the Tenth Circuit affirmed for the reasons given by the district court. 3) The order and judgment is not binding precedent except under certain doctrines and may be cited under the terms of the court's general order.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-11-17 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 41 F.3d 1516 Docket: 94-8004

    Original Title

    Paul K. Jacques v. Trw, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, 41 F.3d 1516, 10th Cir. (1994)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) This document is an order and judgment from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in the case of Paul K. Jacques v. TRW, Inc. 2) The district court had granted TRW's motion for relief from judgment and motion for summary judgment, which the Tenth Circuit affirmed for the reasons given by the district court. 3) The order and judgment is not binding precedent except under certain doctrines and may be cited under the terms of the court's general order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views1 page

    Paul K. Jacques v. TRW, Inc., An Ohio Corporation, 41 F.3d 1516, 10th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) This document is an order and judgment from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in the case of Paul K. Jacques v. TRW, Inc. 2) The district court had granted TRW's motion for relief from judgment and motion for summary judgment, which the Tenth Circuit affirmed for the reasons given by the district court. 3) The order and judgment is not binding precedent except under certain doctrines and may be cited under the terms of the court's general order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    41 F.

    3d 1516
    NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored,
    unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a
    material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral
    argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of
    November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or
    further order.

    Paul K. JACQUES, Plaintiff-Appellant,


    v.
    TRW, INC., an Ohio corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 94-8004.

    United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.


    Nov. 17, 1994.
    ORDER AND JUDGMENT1
    1

    Before TACHA and MCKAY, Circuit Judges, and HANSEN, 2 District Judge.

    The district court granted defendant TRW, Inc.'s motion for relief from
    judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60 and thereafter granted defendant's motion
    for summary judgment. For substantially the reasons enunciated by the district
    court, the orders are AFFIRMED.

    This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of
    law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally
    disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and
    judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General
    Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470

    The Honorable C. LeRoy Hansen, District Judge, United States District Court
    for the District of New Mexico, sitting by designation

    You might also like