Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Jurldine A. Donaldson v. Paul v. Clark, 794 F.2d 572, 11th Cir. (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document is an order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit vacating the panel's previous opinion in the case of Jurldine A. Donaldson v. Paul V. Clark, et al. and rehearing the case en banc without oral arguments. The order was issued by the full court and states that a majority of judges in active service determined the case should be reheard en banc. It also specifies that the clerk will establish a briefing schedule for en banc briefs to be filed.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1986-06-30 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 794 F.2d 572 Docket: 85-8270

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit vacating the panel's previous opinion in the case of Jurldine A. Donaldson v. Paul V. Clark, et al. and rehearing the case en banc without oral arguments. The order was issued by the full court and states that a majority of judges in active service determined the case should be reheard en banc. It also specifies that the clerk will establish a briefing schedule for en banc briefs to be filed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Jurldine A. Donaldson v. Paul v. Clark, 794 F.2d 572, 11th Cir. (1986)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit vacating the panel's previous opinion in the case of Jurldine A. Donaldson v. Paul V. Clark, et al. and rehearing the case en banc without oral arguments. The order was issued by the full court and states that a majority of judges in active service determined the case should be reheard en banc. It also specifies that the clerk will establish a briefing schedule for en banc briefs to be filed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    794 F.

    2d 572

    Jurldine A. DONALDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,


    v.
    Paul V. CLARK, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 85-8270.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Eleventh Circuit
    June 30, 1986.

    James W. Howard, R. David Ware, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.


    Charles R. Adams, III, Fort Valley, Ga., for Clark.
    Alvin McDougald, Fort Valley, Ga., for Harris.
    Kathryn Allen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for Wilcox.
    Gregory Homer, Fort Valley, Ga., for Wilder.
    Katherine M. Kalish, Macon, Ga., for Shelley.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of
    Georgia.
    (Opinion April 22, 1986, 11th Cir., 1986, 786 F.2d 1570)
    Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY,
    VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK
    and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

    BY THE COURT:
    1

    A majority of the judges in active service, on the court's own motion, having
    determined to have this case reheard en banc,

    IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this court en banc without

    oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing
    schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby
    VACATED.

    You might also like