Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSUE:
(i)
(ii)
RULING:
(i)
No. Ogonian cannot claim for self-defense on the said matter. The nature
and number of stab wounds inflicted upon the victim opposes his claim.
The absence of wounds on the body of the accused and the victim eleven
wounds, while there was a supposed struggle that took place belies his
claim. The law requires rational equivalence, when a person is attacked
and one moves in obedience to self-preservation; the defense must be
proportionate with the imminent danger present to avoid injury. All
evidences presented showed no element of self-defense.
(ii)
Yes. Both the accused are criminally liable for the crime. The assailants
were both positively identified by eyewitnesses and their actions indicate
concerted efforts of ensuring the death of the victim and that conspiracy
happened between them.