Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Megafileupload) Conflict of Laws by Sempio Diy PDF
(Megafileupload) Conflict of Laws by Sempio Diy PDF
tQl&
go?
; -,rr';
^".
isf,,
ir* '"-
CONFLICT OF I-AWS
ARAULLO Uil!\TER SITY
LAW L'BRARY
CABAI{AI UAN
ITY
LLB., LL.M
ALICIAV. SE
Retired
Fortter Astistdat
of Appeals
olitvto*Guera/
Ci4'
FornerJDKC.ldge ol Calooun
Citl'
For*rr.Tortgr' F(TC o.f Caloocan
BorE*oiiori in GailLzw'
in
Pmfetsor and Bar Reuieuer
Gai I l-znt
Acatieml
PREFACE
Repcatedl'urped and requested
CoPvrrght 200'l
by
ALICIA V. SEMPIO-DIY
TRAULTD LIUIVFRSITY
LAW I .BRAR T
CAEA}IAIUAN
ITY
number and
Any copy of this book not bearing a
be
,ig"","r. .f.he author on this page shall denounced
u. pro.""dt.tg from an illegal source
'
t".,
N" /43L
W'i
ti
teaching the slrblect. and emphasizing and explainine with exampies tl-re
fundamentals and irnportant aspects of the subiect that students and bar.
reviewees seem to Frnd difficult and burdensonre. This irumble rvork rs
thus dedrcated to aii the larv srudents takrng the subject this vear and in the
vears to come, as well as the author's tl'rousands of former students whc,
are either rcvieu'ing for the bar or are now successfu] l2s,' practiuoner-s. It
is likewise hoped that larr"'professors teaciring the srrbiect, and larr^u'ers
and judges conftontcd with confucts problerns, can find thrs humblc
handbook useful and heipful, especraily as rve do not have enougb laws
nor jurisprudence to guide them in all }lnds of conflicts problems. indeed,
wrth dre fast advance of modem technology rn dre means
of communication
between and arnong tire natrons of the '"vorld, the raprd growth and
expansion of internattonal trade and commerce, the influx of tourists
and foreign traders to out countn as well as the massi\re migration of
our countn'rnen to v,'ork and hve rn forergn shotes, and the great increase
in busir.ress uansactions of foreign corporauons rn d-re Philippines. nrore
and more confhcts problems crytng for solutions will undoubtedll'ause.
The i.nr,aluabie help of her fotmer students Atn. Edr.vard Ong
and bar reviewees Clarence Evangelista and Russei N'liraflor in encoding
her manuscript and preparing it for prtnung ts herebv gratefullr- and
sincerclv acknorvledged.
Pdnted'SY'
MPC Printers
ALICIA V. SEMPIO.DIY
Quezor Ciry
lvlav 2t)04
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
In
Page
General
h
la-
13
Legrtimauon
C. Adoption
B.
14
4
1,7
22
26
29
33
51
57
59
65
74
78
83
86
90
94
97
98
105
15 Property
16 Contracts
i13
Contracts
B. Capacity of Parties
C. Intrinsic Validity of Contracts
D. Special l{nds of Contracts
17 Torts
18 Crimes
123
124
725
128
122
A. Extrinsic Validiq' of
19
137
Busrness Assooation
A.
B.
20
13t)
Corporauons
Partnerships
143
149
of Foretgn.Judgments
151
CONFLICT OT LAWS
CHAPTER
IN GENERAL
L"Defrne Conflict
of
Laws.
with
not ther
of Lalvs.
CONFLICTOF LAWS
IN GENERAL
..state" is used in
3. when the rvord
CONFLICTOF LAWS
7. Distinguish Conflict
mean?
(a) As
ovn
5. Is Conflict
of
Laws part
lar'r,:,
of International Law?
past?
of
character; Confiict
of
IN GENERAT
of Conflict of
Laws?
6. What is the reason for the diversitv of conflicts rules among the
as other branches
of jau': among
otirers, the natural moral laui and the rvritrngs and treatrses
and famous writers and jurists on the subiect.
of
thinkers
CONFLICT
OIJ
LAWS
CONFLICT OF LAWS
clehned as ti,e ll()wcr to irear anci dctcrrnrnc crses oF ti-rc general class tt,
whrch d-re proceedrngs in cluesuon bclons.
Srnce jr-rrisdicuon over ti're sublect marrer ls conferred bv iau.
be conferred b1' consent oi'tire partres or bv tl'reir voluntart'
1a)
lt clnnot
submission.
CHAPTER
Act
(a) First. deternine rvhethcl thc courr i-ras jruisdrction ovcr thc
clse. lf it has no iulrsdrctron, thc case sl.rould be drsrnisscd on tirat t:round.
Ii it l"ras jurisdictron. tllc court rvill cle tcrrninc t.hether it should assume
jLrrisdjction o\rer the case or clismiss it on thc ground of .ionrru nln L'ot'tzj(nian.t.
OF course. 1t is thc lat, of thc forunr that cietcrmines rvhctircr thc court
bas juflsdicUon ol'1lot ovcr thc casc.
cumstances.
2.
Ho*'
the
case?
t'es
f\e-
'^
ccu''r\,n:l*
7691).
irearing on ti.re cvidence is needed. Il, on tl'rc other hand. thc complatnt or
pctitioll. on rts f-ace , sirrxvs the l)rcscncc oI jLrrisdicti<;n, tria] must bc held.
Should thc cvidcnce shorv that tirc coult rcaiiv has no junsciicti<,rr-r, thc case
rnust bc dismrsscr-|.
312) 'l-hrs rs
rr (-onfiict
ii-rrr-rm
()r powcr of r
-lurisdrcuon over thc pers()1r is the competencc
c()rlrl t() rendcr r luclgrnent that rvill brnd thc parues ttrvolvcd: thc
piantrff or pctitloncr, ancl thc dcfcndant or respondent.
(b) .lunsclictrr)n ()ver the piaintrii rs acqutrccl thc tr<xnent ht'
rnvoiics thc pr-rrvcr of the court bt, ilr.t tuttng tirc acttou il tirc prolrct'
picaciing..f unsdicrit,n over thc clcfcndat-rt is acqurlccl rvircti hc eutcrs hts
lul)l)ext,r)cc ot'Lrt ti-rc coercivc pos'cr oi lcgal 1>roccss cxcrtccl bv tht
CONFLICT OF LAWS
A piantrfi.
in tire rnnnler
7. Substrtuted servicc.-
referred to as jurisdiction in
Personal setvice: "Sec. 6. Servlcc in person oll defendant Whenever pracdcable, tire summons shall bc served bt'handing a coP)'
thcreof tc_r tirc defendant in person. or, if l.re refuses to receive and sign
for it, bY tendering it to him." (l{uie 14, 1997 Rr"ries on civil Procedute)
substituted service; "Scc.
CONFLICTOTLAWS
bef<-rrc thc
c()Llrt can accluire jurisdicUon over thc Pcrsol) of dre dcfendant (Pantuleon
servlce
u. ,'lrundon, 1 05 Phi/. 76 I : .\'eqnttt a. I-,e/ronclo. I 0 5 Phil' I 1 )9)"lbus'
rezz, as
of summons
be effected?
oi
ln acdons
CONFLICT OT LAWS
CONFLICTOFLAWS
of sumtlons tnat
bc mircie: llamci\':
(a)
the
Philippines, for. recogmuon of her child with supporq would the action
tire
plarn u ff:
(b) \lhen the defendant does not reside and is not found rn the
Phihppines, and the actlon relatcs to or thc sr-rblect of wirich
is, propern'wrthrn the l)luhppmes treal or pcrsonal). rn which
the defendant has a claim a hen or interest, actual or contingent;
(c) When the defendant is a non-resident but the subject of the
action rs properry located in the Philippines, in whtch tire
reiief demanded consists. whollv or in patt. rn exciudtng tl-re
defendant from any interest therein; and
In
lteel
in
tl're
for
cluasi
FernandeT.
61 SCK'1
23).
a declaration
in
rem.
of summons on
iudgment
(c) X. credrtor of
4. Illustrative
(a) Mar, a
in pertonam.
(a residenr
Y for tire foreclosure of mortgage over a propern- given to hrm br, \' as
securin' for tl-re pavmenr of a dcbt conrracred br' \' while he rvas i. tirc
Pirrirppines. In iris acuon, X l)so pravcd for dehcrencl, juclgrncnt ln casc
10
CONFLICT OF LAWS
OF LAW
CONFLICT OF LAWS
for
tl-re
iudrcial
to all subsecluent matters in the same suit, like appeals. And even if he
leaves the state o[ dre forum prior to tl-re final clcterminatiotr c.'f tire
actron agarnst hrrn, jlrrisdiction of the court over him contintles.
as
.lt'icntirrr::
r'e)'firc forura
'
ceLtrtsl
15 l;ct/. (2(/)#q
v"'as se-rved.
Issue: Nfat' thc Oregon court. in the exercise t-rf rts discretion.
refusc to taiic cognizance of tlic casc?
m2l'not
be
readtil avarlabie in
c1
of the forum;
(b) 'fhe courts of Germanv and Net, yor:li arc opcn ancl
iu'crl()lrrng, and sc^'icc ca' bc rlirde .' thc dcfe'dant
'r
of
tl.rc
forun rv.ulcl
compcl
the forum;
tl.rc forum ma1' alreaclt be clogged s<r
iran-rper the speedr'
cases
"vouid
The belief that the matter can bc better uied and decided rn
another iurisdiction, either bccause the main aspccts of the
case transpircd there or the rnaterial wrtnesses have their
residence therel
(c)
resrdc'rs.f
de fendar.rr
crrirer jru'isdrcuon;
craims
Held:
As has been said before, even tf the court has jr"rnsdictioll over a
confltcts case, it ma1,, bv rnvoking the princrple of forun nzn tluuunreni.
rcfuse to exercise cr assttlne that ltrrisdiction, in vies'of an'{ oi the
1I
LAW
plai.tiff
As to
o[ "forum
\n,)brk
72
CONFLICI OF LAWS
L,AW
httl ifor
rencdt
or dorncsltc
lnxv
-This
rts
conflicts rulcs;
(b) \!hen tl.rc proper forcign lru' has not been ptoperll' pleaded
ancl proved:
(c)
\\,hen thc
casc
1211';
ii.c.. e\ccptions
t,-r courttt-).
rntel'ai .r
clor",-,e
sdc iau,
I.1
.i
foreig. iau
i,
thnt ,r,r.
courts cannot take ludicial noucc oi forergn iarvs, So that if thc Droper
forcign lau'is
pleaded (rn tirc cornpiarnt c,r peuu.,n. or in rhe irnsr,,,ct
'ot
or an\r othcr rcsllonsrve pleadint) ancl is not pl'()vcn :Ls a fact, the cor.Lrr
bas the right to presnlDe that tire aPpliclbie forergn iarv is tire sa'rc as thc
internal or dolncstlc law of the t<>rurn a'd should, theref'r-c. app)v tht
latter law (4don.qu. Cheon1ScngCrc, 4J Pl)il. 1);5.1 loc I-.ton3u. ,\'),quza, /6
Phi/. 1)7; Itn y. Collector, 36 Pltti. 172; I'luenr u. I li.c. 5l Pltil. 6/0; ln ra
If
(1)
b1':
(2) A copv
eivrl
sec'nd
LA}\'
(a)
rs the
tire forum (itx tori) rvill be appiiecl: th:rt is. when tire proper
'l-ettate I'-stutt
t,i:,,
(a)
iJttnt.trtti, .w.bn':.
CONFLICT OF LA}^'s
lc.>:
silu.t rs
apphcd
(.\rt
i 6.
(-,rdc.,
(c) \X/ircn
-\rt.
1(r,
Ne*' (,ivil
li
tl-re
l-ly:
ir.r
rd)
(b) What is meant bv the "proccssual" presumption of lar.v?
Cr>de).
(d)
if it has not
This rule mcans that rvircn the l)rc)per f<rrcrgn l:rs. hes
noI bccn proprerh ltr<tved. thc c<>Ltrt o1- tirc ft;mnt rnirr'
Plcslurrc that satcl forcipr-r iau i:r tht.salrtc as rrs l,rcai oi
clomcstic lat', rl'iricir it cen norv apnlr',
10. How is a foreign larv that has been duly pleaded and pnn'ed to
.11
CONFI,ICT OF LAWS
sotnes.hcre
in our lav"'s,
thcrc ts ir statute s'orded idenxcallv as thc iorcign iarv. s<; thirt our courts
if thev disregarci thc forcign inter:pretation oi sard
tbrergn lav' and grve it tirc same interprt)tadon prcvlousl,v gl.en bv our
CONFLICT OF I,AIVS
of a foreign
Examples:
(l)
LAW
15
'fhere
cannot bc blamecl
coufts.
paf
n'to
goi-rcl
ancl
-\ ioint t'ili
are
\\c are not bour)J t,r cnforcr.tirreign re\'('nu(.,)radministrative lau's. \\'e are llot conccrne cl rvith thc collccrion
oI taxes b1' foreign coulrtries or.r'tth forcign laws rclating tcr
governmt'ntal functrons or m;lttcrs.
(f) When the foreign law might work undeniable injustice
to the citizens or residents nf the forum:
I rrrt'tgn i;rrvs that s'ould result or cau.ie ru;usrict. r,,
16
CONFLICT OF LAWS
CONFLICT OF LAWS
enfl.rrce
or personal propertv
What are the theories that iustift rhe court, in a conflicts case,
to apply the foreign law instead o[ its own domestic or internal
1.
law?
Sonre o[ the traditional thcorics in cleciding rvhethcr to apply the
local or domestic larv or the foreign iarv ur a conflicts casc are thc follorvurg:
S)
larvs
justice.
CONFLICT OF LAWS
CONFLICT OF LAIVS
THEORIESTHATJUSTIFYTHE
19
as
In the above
lierv
court. the L].S. Suprcme (,otrrr rulccl that surce it rvas the --\mcrican
rviro hled the carlicr casc wrth a .lircnch cr-rurt s,hclcin hc lost, hc
could not laterimpeach smcl juclgmcnt agair.rst irim on thc punciplc
of comrq', t'hich grves conclusiveness to the Frcnch decisrcxr and
bars his subseqr-rent acuou frlcd rvith an ;\merican coutt. 'I'hc basis
o[ corlitv rvas srared as the persuasiveness of the foteign
case
of Grai't
filed an
lht3u. Jarria,6,
ol lt,cw \-ork. 225 N.1. 148)
71 X.11. 118:
\.\.
21;L"ouik.i
t'. ]Ltintttt^,.
r'. .\'ranciard
Oi,' (a.
l0
CONFLICT OF LAWS
CONFLICT OF LAWS
THEORIESTHAT'USTIFYTHE
21
of local lau'
forergn
bv appiving a srmilar rule requires us to do so; hcnce. it is as if tirc
foreign }aw has become par:t oi our o\\n internal or domesuc
law
o\\'11
Crvil Code
tells us to do so.
of harmony of
laws
negatlon
of
of
therr transactiolls.
oiall
law's.
o[
p 73)
"r
have
CONFLICT OF LAWS
r22
CONFLICT OF LAWS
G)
of conflicts
rules?
Examples:
1.
of
Example
are
Art
as
well
16, fu'st
as
tl.re
in
likc
ii
CONFLICT OF LAWS
OF CONFLICTS OF RULES
3, What
pre-
involved: and
In other words,
legai consequences
<-,f
questlon.
ln
\\'hlt
25
lau' rs
or tire larv of tlrerr destrnatron. not thc iarv oF tbe c()unrnr wirere the lost
cargoes were ioaded, or the placc r.lf er-nbarliauon.
Another example: .\Lt. 'l 039. Ner,v (-ivil (.ocle. provrding tl.rat
"capactn to succeeci rs govcmcd bl thc iarv o[ thc natron o[ thc <]ccr.dertt". .l Ierc aqain, wc get the picttrrc ql: a. persc.rn rvlro dics, bur rvh.sc
heirs rnav bc cttizens of another coulrtr\,'. \\'irat Iarv should applv to dctcr-
will succeed the deceased? The la*' savs it is tl-ie larv of the
countrv of rvhich thc deceased rvas a citizcn. and not the lav,, of the
mrne wl-ro
w
CONFLICT OF LAWS
CONFLICT OF LAWS
CHARACTERIZATION OF CONFLICTS
RULES 2i
Niost wrrters hoid rhat ()n the grounds oI practicai necessrtr. a'd
con\ren1el]ce. rt is the torum. or rire ,e.r 7un. that should cietermrne tire
probiem'.s char;rcrerization. uniess tl-re result would be a. clear rnjusuce.
the followrng
case:
Cibb.r u. Goul
rll
P. 1.. 59
Pltil.
29): A
Califor.nran wife
CHARACTERIZATION
OF CONFLICTS RULES
of
the successior-r.
as
"classification" or "quah6caflon",
is tl-re ptocess c-rf assigniuq a certait't set of facts or facttral situatron to its
proper or correct iegal categort'. Evcr-r' rule rli lau'is bascd on situations
of fact. tcrual or ttlagrnccl. sincc tl-re lclislatol: tnust trl tct solve iactual
situatrons that migl-rt arise in tirc futurc, bascd crn past obscn'irtic-,n and
experience. These legal categoties nrar-bc farnilt, relations. colltracts, torls.
succession, propert\:, etc. Bv charactcrtzing the legal prt.,blem. the court
or the parties invoh'ed reach thc proper solutton whether to applv the
local law or the proper fotergn laur
are g<x'erned bv
the /c:t fon. 'fhus. matters of sen'rcc oi summons, ioindcr or splittinq ()f
cause of acuon, hox- to appeal. peuocls of appeal. crc. are governed b,r'
Statute o[Frauds tirat ti.rc partres had in rmnd at the time the &ansaction
took place. Thcn, proceed to applv the intended iaw in its "totalitv"
rncludrng its penc,ds of prescnpticin and its Statute ol ljrauds. ,\n cxcepnon
rs if the subject-rnatter is propertv locatcd rn tire Philipptnes, in u'hich
case Plrilrpprne
iaul being
rr-r
B,
28
CONFLICTOF LAWS
CONFLICT OF LAWS
that under l-nglish lar'"', the perrod to sue ()n tire promissorrfour
i4) r,ears. In thc Phihpoines. thc period .i prescriptrt)n rs ten
nore
(1()t vears. If acuon rs idcd rn rhe i)hihpnrnes bo'ond 4l,.or. irom rhc
issuance ol tl-re note but r'"rthrn 1{) vears, sirould rve hoid the action as
Lrs assurne
1-c
iarr,.
lil
CHAPTER
PERSONAL LAW
THEORIES IN DETERMINING
ONE'S PERSONAL LAW
1.
law?
hj6 whcreyet
It
of
of
of
an indrvidual
. r$'
>..r.lr*Av
30
CONFLICTOFLAWS
CONFLICT OF LAVVS
PERSONAL LA1A
PERSONALIAW 3I
The united States, like other common raw countries, follows the
domiciliarv theorv.
\:l
h:rnds
of clPacln:
tc)
yes. In countries that follow the domiciliary or eclectic or situs theoty, no.
Code)
l-ras
no crlli1c1.\' t('
1lct.
one that is personal and more or less permanent, not temporary. A ciuzen,
on the other hand, is one who owes allegiance to, and is entitled to the
ptotection of, the State. In the held of Confhct of Laws, however,
nationality and citizenship are the same; o!, "national" and "citizen" are
the same. When our law refers to one's national law, therefore, the law
(b)
(.j
of Filiprnos
an alien is the lav' of his
citizenship (e.g., Art. 16, sec. par., referring to the "national law" of the
means the person's law
It
ts
of citizenship. Thus,
r.s
his national law already becomes the law of his new citizenship; the former
of
an
an
8. What are the reasons why some countries adopt the nationality
(a)
ntnecl
bl
tl-rc
iau'oi
(b) The
oi
capacin-
of
hts dornicile
laws on status and familv relations wherever they may go and even when
they migrate to other counfties. Note that manv Filipinos \r'ho have
Iat'.
to
the
Phihppines and die here because they sull consider themselves as FiJ-ipinos.
States?
\\c ftrlioN
rhc rr:irronaiitr
thr.<,fl.fiftfiUl
tn
!rr
fy
r32
CONFLICT OT LAWS
CONFLICTOF LAWS
connected viith the country where they have made their home. It is
adopted bv the United States and other cornrnon law countries, whose
populations consist of peoples of different nationahucs with vannng tradidons, cuinrre, and ideals, and whose uniw mav be consideted achieved bv
adopting the law of their domrole as the law that govems their status and
family relations. Countries with mixed populauon brought about by the
migation of foreigners to their shores need the dor'niciliary principle to
certain fusion of their populatron and to avoid the necessity of
^ttdn ^
appli4ng a different law to ptactically every case.
It offers no solution to
the problem
ofa
stateless person or
(d)
CONFLICT OF LAWS
NATIONALITY THEORY
of the 1987
CONFLICT OF LAWS
NATIONALITY THEORY
Each countr'or state has the sole porver and authonh ro determrne
under its internal or rnunrcipal ]av' ud-ro are its citrzens or nauonals. r\s
provided in Art. 2 of tire Haguc Conven[on on conflict of Nationa[n.
Laws (April 12,19301:
',{nv question
the nationai:rv
as to .rvhetirer a
of a particular
person possesses
tl-:at state.',
aturlltzatiorr.
tus soli - ,\
No. Dual
'l'hrs
oi
the
36
CONFLICT OF LAWS
NATIONALITYTHEORY
CONFLICT OF LAWS
37
both
n:x>re effective
NATIONALITYTHEORY
Chinese citizen by marriage, dies, leaving some properties in our count]vzhere she did some business before her death. Since Art. 16, pat. 2, of
the Nerv Crvil Code, requires us to appiy her national law in determining
who are her hehs and how much is the share of each, we should know
which iaw a Philipprne court should applv to her succession; whether
Japanese law or Chinese law.
10.
to
tl-re application
mosdy connected."
Undoubtedlv', in the above problem, Californra is the more
effective connecdng factor in determining whicl-r of tl-re girl's rwo
nationalities ot citizenships, is irer personal Ia-*.
8. In what case or cases may a Filipino have dual citizenship from
the point of view of a third state?
at the time
II
CONFLICT OF LAWS
NATIONALITYTHEORY
rrv that she was.more closeiv connected to J apan or Chrr-ra, the countries
rrl wlrich she was a cirizen at the ume of her deatl-r. In this case. then, the
tlomicilian theorl' comes to the rescue and will consider tl-re countr-u- o[
lrcl domicile at tire time o[ her death (Singapore). So, rve sirould Ftrst
applv the nauonaliry theory by taking her rwo natronal laws (]apanese and
()hinese) and applyrng them together insofar as thev are consistent and
harmomous with each other. BLrt if thev are inconsistent and in conflict
witi-r each otirer. then we should alreadv apply the law of Singapore,
which was her domrcile and home at the time of her deadr.
12. Suppose the person whose succession is in question before a
Philippine court is stateless. How should the court decide the case?
Srnce the person tn questron is stateless and, therefore, has no
national law, we cannot apply the nationalitv theory (Art. 16, sec. par.,
New Civil Code) to hrm. ln this case, ,rEain the domrcrhaq' theorv comes
to the rescue, and the court shall appll' the larv of hts domicile or if he has
none, tire law of the country of his temp<,rrar_v domicile.
coNFLlcroFLAws
in
3e
Hower-er.
tlrs rulrnglras aireadr been supersecieci b'subsecluenr
cases (.Toientin, t.
Para.,. I I'J CR I 16..Rm. z: Lt,en,..t /.i
tJ aR J ;:..R
il,.*,,ir,l)rr,','.' , ,O
/ ii, among odrers)
all pr";;;;;ffi;;r,
'Ck4
of Rure i 0g are foto*'ed and ali persons with
rntercst
ii
ifi
iitr
15'
t'al
is held. ,h.
p;;.:J;;il,;:
--*^rbJ (rL r
19g7
iifl
Hf,f
fis
constitution?
$tr
{s
,Jtr
$#
:3t
iff
and
Yn.
uoni
19'
NATIoNALITyTHEoRy
,.:,.It{OO-e
are ciuzens
of thc pl'lippines:
prousions
r:li:
i!:
,;Lr
rili
i;:
iri
Itl,
ii4
Court?
In a long line of
IO
NATTONALITYTHEOR}
CONTLICT OT LAWS
CONFLICT OF LAWS
NATIONALITYTHEORY 4I
625.
i1,
the U.S. and Sparn) and were Spanish subjects on rhar date, unless
thev l.rad lost therr Phihppinc citizcnshrp on Nfar. 14,1935;
ahens fathers are alread-r' IrrJrpuros at blrth rvidrout need of elecung Phdtpprne
bl
citizenslup.
11,
CONFLICT OFLAWS
CONFLICT OF LAWS
NATIONALITYTHEORY {3
NATIONALITYTHEORY
Filiprnas who married Chinese husbands legally. Since under
the law of China, they followed their husbands' citizenship,
they all became Chinese. That is why many Filipinas later
opted not to marry their Chrnese husbands legally, so that
25' 195)'
L9i GR L'5t97' Sept'
Phil. i2l;Talarocl'
I
got marned to
who' before Mav 14' 1935'
(9) Forergn women
*i; *nt themseives be lawfuiiv naturalzed
on
citizens of the Phrirpp-t"
n^i fott their Philippine citizenship
the strength
Philippures who' on
All other persons born in the
the Roa case'
n of thejut nli docmne in
of the erroneou' "ppht"oo
unless they
cidzens'
tt"tts.";ltrtgino
were mistakenly dtd;;;'tr"
by tvr
citizens
1'g3' These are
(2)
(3)
(10)
had lost
thti' titizt"li*it *t
14'
tuit''
122-na)
Paras' suPra' PP'
22.
1935
law?
Constitution a transitorY
Because
of
long as there were children
wetJdlo*ed to elect Phihppine
as
elected
of
teached 2l andtl"y ti;;;;iaheady
followrng the citizenship
aliens
be
which latter case they t;;il;
their fathers'
mother
23. Suppose the Filipino
Constitution-"" "J;;^ti;"'ata
the citizenshiP of the child?
1935
is
to her alien husband' what
the rnother
followed the ciuzenship of
The child, berng ille gttrmate'
from birth'
the chrld is a Filipino
without need of tttJ;""' fit"te'
marries
of a Filipino woman who
24. Vhat is the citizenship
(1) In the case of Zita Ngo Burca u. Repablir, Jan.20, 1967, ir was
held that the ptopet proceeding vuherein an alien'woman married to a
Filipino can herself be declared a Filipino citizen is a naturalization
ptoceeding in a court of justice, and that any such declaration by any
other office or agency is null and void.
foreigner?
she acquired the nauonality
If
(1) Prior to the 19?3 Constitution:
her Philippine citizenship'
lost
of her aiien husband' she
the many
Lin
Q)
Sec. 15
MEa
Ya
Yao a. Comm.
44
CONFLICT OF LAWS
NATIONALITYTHEOR\
2 and nonc of thc discluaiihcauons unclcl Scc. -1. both of thc Rcvrsccl
\vatulahzation l,at; ]t rs cnougir ther sl'rc 1-rlolcs rhat sl'rc is nor drscluahiiecl
to l:c a Filipin o crilzen not necessarih- in court but even bcf<_,rc an agencr
Llic rlrr' Lnrnirlratron (.orlnrissiorr.
Note also lhat an ahcn woman rnarrrcr-l t() ;tn aiien liusband
rviro (tl-re husbancl) is subsccprentlr.naturalizcd als<.r follt.,l,s the l)hrJ_rppinc
citrzenship c;f her husband, pro'idecl shc d.cs
'ot suiicr f'.m a'r .f
rltt tlrstltrahficluutts tlrtd('r )cc. -l , tlrc s;rrrrt l(t.r rscd \rrLrrairznti.,l l-,ru,
'f
'l'lirs is
a casc of derivative naturalization (slr-rilar ro rhc ninor clrildren
ol
:r uarurali;zcd
ljilipint
citizcn;.
is no lau,g,r^rinn,i,lg
alicns n-rarr:icd t. Fil4rrnrs thc riEht t. bc acimrttccl lnr.. nruch lcss givcn
l)crlnallcllt rcsiclcrlcc irl. thc l)hLiipltitrcs. l'ltlr oi aircns rtt() rl-lc l)l-rilpprlcs
rflti t]rctr ldrrrtssr,,t) 1ls lltlnllgr;lltts ts j)(,1 :l llt;tttct.,rl r.rqlit. cr.en il tht,r
arc icgallr,marrieci tc, .Fihprnos. i\iarrrrrgc
oi
tircr-e
Note: Unliiic t|'t': i\10):tt Drt rt.;t rvhelc the aLcn lrornan marliccl
to a liiliplro hr.rsba'd drd not appear r. ha'c anl drscluaLtrcation for
traturalization, the ahcn \\'onlan in thc abo'c Df umanton case re fused tc.r
It'ar c tlris coulltf\ r'r't'n aflcl tlrc cxl'rrrari,,n ,,t'ir.ir.cxterrr-lt.ri stei. ltere and
itsteail g()t ll?rrrlccl to a l''ihpino. apparcnth't, avoid ircr d(,portat1on.
26. What is naturalization, and rvhat are the clifferent modes of
CONFLICT OF LAWS
NATIONALITYTHEORY
45
(3) By
naturalization?
of
age on the
16
CONFLICT OF LAWS
NATIONALITYTHEORY
CONFLICT OF LATVS
NATIONALITY THEOR\
rvho )rave not cvtnced a snccre destrc t<., learn aud etlbract.
the custorrrs, tradrtrons. and ideals of the liilipinos:l
17) Crtrzens or sub jects of naurns rvith rviro' tl-re Phiirppir-rcs rs
at war: and
(8) Ciuzcns or subjecrs of a iorergrr countn,k;ther than the United
tr.r
(5) Fle rnr-rst be able to speali itnd u'r'irc l:nglish or Sparrish and
anv one of the pnncipal Philipprne languages; and
(2)'fhe appltcant must not bc lcss than eigl.rtecn (1ii) vear. of .gc
at the ume of the Frhng of hrs/hcr petluon;
cigzcn.
turalizcd
(1)
as
be
Plrilipprne ciuzens:
of their
rdeas;
Pol,vgamists or believcrs in tire practicc of pol,vgam,v;
Persons ccrnvicted of a crirne involving m<-rral turpirude;
dotntnance
(3)
(4)
(5) Persons suffering frou mental alienation or incurable
contagrous disease:
(6) Persons
4H
CONFI,ICT OF LAWS
NATIONALITYTHEOR\
enc]
CONFLICT OF LAWS
NATIONALITYTHEORY
irl
Act.
9139?
Sec. -{
same
not clualified
i-l)
irron-r
r-ne
49
oi
woman in No. (7) above retains her Philippine citizenship unless bv her
act or omission, she is deemed under the law to have renounced her
Philippine citizenship.
pr.,lvgarny;
r-r'rolal
turpitudcl
Under Sec 2
of
'I'hc.,sc
of
deserters
of
the
thercoi
(3) By direct act of the Nauonal Assembly (now Congress).
31.
Iti(r.
"
1' Ltn
(lon-rruout'<'altit .\cr.
6i
:r: tlttcndccl
l-ris ciuzcnsiriP
of Philippin,
citizenship?
Sec. 4
f{
,cq
nt
ifl
iIi
:1',ri
;t
.,d
,ii
l$
'ti
:ll
,,.t
Note, however, that under the 7973 and 1987 Consututions, the
of
.rl!
'O
NATIONALITYTHEORY
CONFLICT OF LAWS
CONFLICT OF LAWS
as
E
CHAPTER
rs
livrng; and
of their ideas;
(3) Person convi,cted of crimes involving moral turpitude; or
(4) Penon suffering from mentai alienation or incurable contagious
diseases.
l*
cloniilii.
2. Define domicile.
Ftxed. permanent
It
is
has a settled
legal purposes, either because hts hon-rc is tl.rere or bccause that is the
placer assigned to hirn bJ-lotu"' (lrrrst llcstatelnent, scc. 9).
[\rt.
.1
CONFLICT OF LAWS
THEDOMICILIARYTHEOIIY
CONFLICT OF LAWS
glr-ctl Diacc"
rvltrlc.'resider-rcc'apphcs t() a tctr)P()fx1-\rstlt\'()i1Persoll tu a
ll',rtl, t'. C.. 1.. =0 .\CR. 1 :t8,
of abode'
bv tlrc lau'
w'hethcr
of
the vahdiri'
of
a drvorce decree
obtained abroad.
theorl', whv
5. considering that our countrv follows the nationality
theorv?
is it still important for us to know and studv the domiciliarv
some cases' our own larv nakes the hrv of the domrcile
()i c()nfllcts cases'
a persor-r the controllir-rq tactor in thc soluttt,lr
(1)
. oi
ln
fori
The prcvarirng rule is that thc iorurn applics its orvn concept ()i
domicile in deterrruning the dornicrle of a htrsant bctbrc its courts.
7.
What law determines one's domicile, his national lau'or the lex
(a)
assisnccl
b)'in*'t,,
a pcrs()1r
firc domicile
of
one's natlonalitv
if
ln
macle s'iti.r
rr
54
CONFLICT OF LAWS
THEDOMICILIARYTHEORY
CONFLICT OF LAWS
THEDOMICILIARYTHEORY
55
$
t[
domicile at pleasure.
of
of origin.
If
1s
t,i[
.,$
ill
i,ifl
(1) N,hnors
;l*
'
if
{r
F
(4)
o[a foundling
(a) If fiey arc below the age of majontli rhe rules <;n
minors applr, to thern.
p) If they are of age and have guardians, thev follou,
the dorrucile of ch'ice of their- guardrans. If thev ha'e no guardrans,
tireir consrructive do'ucile is their domicile of cr-roice before
thev becamc insane.
If fie
marriage is valid;
(i) The consrrucrn'e domicile of the wife is tl-re
domrcilc of borl.r spouses, ur.rless the larv alk;u,s thc
wifc to have a separate domicile, tor valid and
compelling reasons (Art. 69, Jiarnilv Code).
(ii)
If
there
rs
l
.r
ili
irlii
,i
il
'ill
1:il
56
CONFLICT Of LAWS
CONFLICT OF LAWS
Phi;./
i't'
CHAPTER
of emplovment
as
voluntarilt',
If
of
tl-re
ffansactron or e\.ent,
of tlrc nrarriage
ulebraliani.r
1s
CONFLICTOF LAWS
rI
CONFLICT OF LAWS
THESITUSORECLECTICTHEORY
2.
If
CHAPTER
BII
16, tlrst par.. of the Nerv Civil Code provldes that "real
properw as well as personal ProPert) is subiect to the law of the countrv
where it rs siruated". Thus, if tl-re act or uansaction involves properq-'
Art.
rhnuiti.
by the /er
titu.t
or
of dle tfansacdon
of the /sI
1.
a French
of "renvoi" arise?
Everv internai or municipal hu'oix. state has two pnrts; (1) its
purelv internal or don'reshc iav rvhicl.r appLies to dornestic cases; and (2J
Its rules in Conflict of Laws rvirich tt appires to cases wlth some forergr.r
elernent.
of "renr-oi"
tr-,
r-vhetlrer the reference bv the iex/an (the lau' of the countr-v where the
problem arises) to the foreign larv irrvolves (l) a refercnce to the internai
larv of tl.re forergn larv or (2) a reference to the entlrer\ <.rf thc foreign iau,'.
In such casc, if thc hrst statc firllorvs the nationahn, thcorr', and
the second statc fbllorvs the domtciiral\' tbcort, tiic problcrn of "rcnvoi"
wiil
rn<-rst
probabli
artsc.
of
60
THEPROBLEMOTTHE"RENVOI"
CONFLICT OF LAWS
counrry for 50 years andwho dies here, leaving a sizable estate. Art. 16,
sec. par., of the New Civil Code provides that in testate or intestate
succession, we should appi,v the national law of the deceased which. in
this case..is Califotnia iavr But Cal-iforniat tnternal lav'has one ruie for its
own citizens who reside there, and another rule fot its ciuzens who have
their domiciles abroad. In the latter case, California law provides that the
Iaw of the domicile of its deceased citizen should apply. Thus, while our
Civil Code refers the matter to California law (the national law of the
deceased), California lavr refers the matter back to us, telling us to apply
the law of the deceased's domicile, which is Philippine lavz Should the
Philippine court tasked to setde the estate of the deceased accept the
"renvoi" and apply Philippine law, or insist that California intetnal law
binding on its own citizens-residents should be applied, the same being
the deceased's national law? This is the "tenvoi" problem.
was a California citizen who had resided in the Philippines for a long time
California internal iaw, one for its citizens who teside there and another
for its citizens 'q/ho reside in other jurisdictions, the Supreme Court held
that if it should refer the matter to California lau'. said law will toss the
CONFLICT OF LAWS
THEPROBLEMOFTHE-RENVOI"
6-!
*,iffi:tt;rfffi11i:
p*."i. ,J.t"gr*ug
.hrr;r;;.;.
ever
This means that tl-re court d.es not want the probrem r<,,
be sent
back to us. That is, as in the case of the testate or intesrate
succession
of
<-rf
appl1. iris
his countr\,,.
of
transmission.
62
THEPROBLEMOFTHE"RENVOI"
CONFLICT OF LAWS
Under this tireor\i v'e would simpll do u.hat the tbreien courr rvould
do if confronted wrth the same case. So ti.rat ri the Ca[fornia court (as in
the Christensen case) would applv Ca[fornra internal larq we would do
the same. If, however, said court would applv Phriiporne 1aw, u'e would
follou,' suit. The advantage of this theorv is that regardless of forum, the
appiicable lav'will be the same. But rt can also result in internauonal
ptngpong if we do what the Califomra court would do,
court would do what we do, erc.
br.rt
the California
This occurs when the local court, rn adopung the foreign court
theorl', dtscovers tirat the foreign court acceprs the "renvoi." But since
the foretgn law remits the case to Philippine law, being the iaw' oi tire
deceasedt domicile, thc f<-'reign courr lrral discover thar Philipprne larv
does not accept tire remission (as it applies the national larv o[ the
deceased), so the foreign court, sitting as a Philipprnc courr, would stdl
appl,v rts own rnternal lav": This is then rvirat our court will applr'.
6.
Thev are not the same becausc u'hile "renvoi" invoh'es two laws,
transmrssion actually involves three larvs.
of
a forergn
CONILICT OF LAI\|
"RENVOI"
rl
fi
63
ilq
l:i
I
iri
lrlv
ri:i
:ii,i
:,i;r:
Tire facts:
l)unng thc scttlcmcur oliris cstate. lhc ilicgtmrrate chilclrcn t-,pposcci ir<-rtir
r.vills bccausc thel had irecn cleprivcd ,.'f therr: lcgrtin-rcs. and rnsisting tirat
Phil-rpprnc larv sl-roulcl l:e altplied.'l'hcrc arc uo cc>urpttls<.rn' heirs r-rtrdcr
'I'exas laq'. ancl -I'cxas lar',i iurtltcrrrtorc, docs tt()1 itavc conflicfs rulcs
governing thc strcccssron rtf tts citizcns.
Helcl;'lirc illcgitlr-ratc
cl.rilc'lrcn
^rc
bccausc unclcr'fcx',ts lnv'. rvhicl-r is thc ttattot-titl larr' r.,f tl-rc deccascd and
t'hrcl-r rvc urust apph'r-rucier,\lt. 16, par. lrvo of thc Civil Coclc. thcrtc arc
no compulson- ircirs and no lcgttimcs.
sit-rcc
thc deccascd
cxecnted tn'o rr'ills. ou.c t() go\-crn his cstate lr tl-rc l)irihppincs and tl-rc
()thcr to g()\'crn his 'l'cxas cstatc. lt tlust havc bccn thc itrtention ol tl-rc
deceascd to i1?rvc l)irihpprne 1211' garlct-t1 his propcrtics in the Pl-rilippurcs,
thc Suprcrrc (,our:t hcld tirat i'trllorvlrg '\Iitiano r' lJt'ittto. i0 Pltil. 867. tr
provision rn a torcrg'ncr'.s u,ill to tl-rc cftcct lhrt lis pr<4rclrrcs ur thc i)hilipplnes
shall be drstnbutecl in lccordancc u'rth l)l-rilqtprnc iat' :tt'tti t'tot tn '.rccordanct'
u'rtl-r hrs nlttional larv rs illcgal atrd votd.
iJ:
,*r
--i&
:6'
'l{
ft
-lt
,il
CONFLICT OF LAWS
64
THEPROBLEMOFTHE"RENVOI"
CONFLICT OF LAWS
"
217'i.
CHAPTER
CONFLICTS RULES ON
STATUS
AND CAPACITY
Art.
.10,
Net'Ciril
C-oclc. proricles
tl-re
follorving conditions:
66
CONFLICl OF LAWS
(a)ThcPlrrPoseisfavorabletotilefenrst'Llielirtistrvc:na
ireu'of the larent): rnci
lr ts boru aiive uncict. .\rt' 'll of the Neu Crtrl
an
srmpie donauon or is considercd
6) Il
'
CONFLICT OF LAWS
CAPACITY
67
(-t>dc.
Youth\\'eliate Code)
In fact. Art. 5 oi PD 603 (The Child and
provides that
ls lrlore precise u'heu it
..Tl-rectr.r]personalinoitheclrildslrll]crlmmerrcefrotn
t]rennreofl-risconception,forallpr-rtptlsesfar'orablet<llrim.
subiectt()thefcquirementstlf,\rtrclc.lloftlre(]ivilCode.''
88'te6/)
Depenclingontl-reconditionsrlfitsbirtlr.thcrcale.tlrereforc'
4. S7hen is civil personality extinguished?
scr
drataslongastlrcclrildrsaliveupor-rconrpietcscparattorrfrt;mtlrcmodrer,.s
rvotnb, rt
i.s
(b)Extraordirrary_rr,ltlranintra-ttterinclrfeoflesstiranT
f<rr: at least t-l hours aiter completc
months, in u'hich case lt must livc
j.U.'"r, from ti-tc trother's r'vomb bctore it is consrtlcled born and to
havc acclutrccl civil perst-'nahti''
p';r,,1ln\'alreadr.beacktrtlrvlcdgedl>r.tlreihtjlcrevenbeft>rc
i8 Phtl 866:
(Da
birtl-r
[cru.t t. St'attitr'
to bc sr-rPpor:ted c\rcr'l $-htle still rn thc
alreadr'r:ntrticd
is
it
(c)
2'InConflictofLa\t,s,whatla.lr'determinesthebeginningof
one's personalilv?
His personal laur if ]re rs a citizcl-r oi a coutrtrt
(like thc 1)hil-rppincs)
nadonahn t[.,,rt. iris natjonal las'
Follorvs tl-re
rs
.,i o .nur]tr.-thlt
domicihar|
the<-,r\. tl-re
lf
hc ts a citlzer.r
declared as such?
"Absence" is considered a special legal status pertaining in the
Philippine iaw to a person rvho has disappeared from his domicile, his
whereabouts being unknown, witl.rout leaving an agent to administer his
properrv-, or even if he had left an agent, the power conferred b)' tlt"
absentee on the agent Lras expired (r\rt. 381, New Civil Code).
One's status of being absent is determined in accordance u'ith
his personal larv (u'htch mav be his national iau' or the law of his domrcile), and jurisdiction to declare him as such also belongs to the countr\,
of .x'hich he is a national or a dornici[art', as the case tnlrr' be. Hou'evcr,
our own courts also har.e iurisdrction to declare an alien domicilian'in the
Phdrppines as absent (ike when a Fihpino wife asks a local court to
declare her al-ien husband an absentee) under the conditions laid dou,n
.iA
CONFLICT OF LAWS
lrv otrr Civil Codc (-\rts. 38,t,385. and 386). (See 'laalingu. I'ernandc\.
l)lti/. 3 1'1
lf
CONFLICTOFLAWS
death under
CAPACITY
absence
of rwo
69
(2)
In either
(a)
\\'ithrn
seven
(b) The heirs insututed in tl.re will of the abscntee. rviro mat
present an authentjc copv of said will;
if the absentec le ft no rvill;
(d) Those w-ho rnay have over the propert-r' of tl.re absentee
some right subordinated to the condrtion oFhis death. (Art.
presumed dead
385. rd.)
fte, dangerous
expediuons, etc.).
Rernernbeq thougta that for the pqpose of rernardage, extaordinary
t[Tere is danger
of
absence
of two (2)
.vears
N
10.
in Conflict of Laws?
Vhat determines one's age of maiority
it is the personal law
status'
personal
Since age is part of one's
(whether
a person that
.r""uo"^t law or the law of the domicile) of
not'
or
of
maioritv
vrhether he has reached the age
law?
What is the age of maiority undet Philippine
under the
of contacting marriage without parental consent has'
law, remained at the age
of
same
twenry-one
Note that also under the same Rep' Act No' 6809' thc responsiand guardians' for
bility of parents (if the children live in theit company)
tt.
of
tort, committed by their chiidren and 'watds below 21 years
with
are
18, they do not need guardians anymore' unless they
already
"Uor..
under some other drsabiJrtY'
of
ot
Forthedonationtob.,r"lid,therespectivecapacitiesofdonorand
CAPACITY 7',
age'
hasbeenfetained.TheresultisthatsuchParentsandguardiansarestill
(as to patents) and
responsible for the damages caused by thel childten
even ifthe chdd is above 18 years ofage (the aqe
*.rd, 1", to guardians)
-but
is
below 21 yeats of age' The defect of the provision
of maiority)
the chil&en are
respect to guardians of minor chil&en, because if
12. $7hat
their national law), as well as the extrinsic and intrinsic vaiidiw of the
donation. the subject-matter of the donation being located in Fiori<ia.
tt.
i.,.r-t.,
11.
CONFLICT OF LAWS
CONFLICT OF LAWS
law' which is
donee shalt be govetned by Florida law (not by PhiJippine
ti.
What about the use of names and surnames, which is also part
of onets status? What is the law on the matter?
Traditionally, a. person's name was not regarded as part of his
status because he could change his name at wiil, but our law nov'
provides that "no person can change his name ot sumame u,ithout judicial
authority" (Art.376, New Civil Code), and the procedute for the change
of one's name is Rule 103 of the Revised Rules of Court. As held in
REublic u. CA. and lVong, G.R No. 97906, May 21, 1992, "a change of
name is a special proceeding to establish the stalus of a person involvrng
his relation with others, that is, his legal position in, ot with regard to, the
rest
of
CONFLICT OF LAWS
the cornmunih'."
L-23595,
Feb.
20, 196q.
CONTLICTOF LAWS
CONFLI
CAPACITY
79
status.
of his
,rral.i"t
of
Thus, our coutts can decide cases invorving the status and capacity
foreigners brought before them, but in doing so, our courts
will
appl1,
I"- oi th.
use the surname of the mother under the Family Code (Art. 176).
Howevet, the new Republic Act No. 9255, amendrng Art. 176 of the
Family Code, now allows iliegitimate children to use the surname of the
father "iftheir fiIiation has been expressly recognized by the father through
the record of birth appearing in the civil register, or when an admission
rn a public document or pdvate handwritten instrument is made by the
father" during the latter's iifetime.
The right to use a title of nobiliw depends upon the national lav'
the person concerned (X.abel, Conflict of Laws, Vol. I, p. 169). Such
persons may condnue using thet titles of nobility in our country, but if
they apply for nattrafization, they must renounce any hereditary tide or
of
lavr.
r"
CONFI"ICT OF LAWS
CONFLICTOFLAWS
CONFLICTSRULESOFMARRIAGE
75
of the contracting parties who must be maie and female; and (2) consent
freely given in the ptesence of the soiemmzing officer (Art. 2). While the
formal requisites are:
(1) Authority
CHAPTER
personal deciaration that they take each othet as husband and wife in
the presence of not less than two witnesses of legal age. (Art. 3, id.)
stated in Article 35 Q), but an irtegul^rity i" the formal requisites shall not
affect the validity of the mariage; the party or parties tesponsible for the
irregularity will however, be civilly, criminally, and administratively liable
(Art.4. id.).
as
a contract?
coulltrles
Such problems arise because different
depending
moralifi"
on ,h.t'pubhc pohct', culture' or code of
*Uatf
or
states'
have different
n"
'''n':'iug"t
applv rn such
Thus, rve should know what rules or laws to
conflicts problems.
formal validity of
of
any formai requisite shall also rendet the mardage void ab initio, except as
as rvell as
i:.tT^l
fotthevalidiwofarnatriage.Theessentialrequisitesare(l)legalcapaclt},
is
requlsltes
considered incestuous.
CONFLICT OI LAWS
76
phihpprnes in accordance w-1th the larvs in force in the countn'- rvhere thev
u,ere solemnizecl and yaiid there as -sucl'l. sirall also be valici in thts countrv.
except those prol-ribiteci undcr Arucies 35ii). ('l). (5; and (6). 36' 37 and
CONFLICTOF LAWS
CONFLICTS RULES OF
IUARRIAGE 7'
38"
But,
be
(2) \\e proxj tnaruages., w-hile thev are nor allowed under philipprne
internal law, tlre rule in dre U.S. is tl-rat where perrnitted bv the law of tire
pla.ce where the proxy particrpates in the marriage ceremoo)., thev are
entitled to recognition at least insofar as the fonnal valditv of the
marriage is concemed. This rule is intended to protect the wife and chii&en
(Salonga. supra, p. 266).
(Art.
35
{a})
5.
and
\\c
of
sn}1
oi
lex lo,t
tire
Fami11' Code.
CONFLICT OF LAWS
7E
CONFLICTSRULESOFMARRIACE
cherishes
frst
cousin in the
B. MARRIAGE AS A STATUS
1.
Iil
'urhen a woman marries a foreigner, she usuallv loses het nationaliry and
instead foilows that of the husband. Another reason is that the husband is
usuaily the head of the famrly, so that the husband's personal iaw governs
the personal relations of the spouses.
of
obligations of the spouses are purelv personal to them and are not
ordinarily interlered with bv the courts. As to the aspect of the properq''
relations of the spouses, the law lavs down certain ruies and ludicial
sanctions, as thef mav afFect public interest'
of the spouses in
Conflict of Laws?
personal ;:elations of the sPouses are
governed by Philippine law since we follow the nationahtv theon (Art'
15, New Civil Code). Other countries that foliow the natlonali* theo{'
In the Philippines,
ipso
will
govern theit personal relations, the law of the husband or the law
of the wife?
79
It
CONFLICTSRULESOFMARRIAGE
CONFLICT OF LAWS
or omission, she is deemed, undet the larg to have renounced her citizenship".
80
CONFLICT OF LAWS
CONFLTCT OF
LAWS
rnarringe, tl-re larv oF thc last com!n()n natlonaiit\- of the s1;ouses rvould
govern. to avoid preiuclice tc., the rvifc rvho r.r'or:id suf[er a cirangc in her
rights .,r'rthout rnr free erercise of chciice on her part (as provided in dre
)-Iague Convention oi 1905)
(3) ii the spolrscs retain thel' diifcrcnt nauonalities after the
rlarriage, it l'ras beet.r suggested that the national larv of both slrouses
slrotrld govern (l{abcl, rd.. p. 327). Anothcr rvriter. lrorvever. offers a
bettcr sohrtion; i.c., applr' the lav' of the l.rusband rt the time of thc'
nrirrriage (\\blf, Prn atc lntemational J--a*',361), 361). 1'he result, rt is clauncd,
rvill rrot necessarih'bc unfair to ti-rc wife, bccause the tiren national lal' of
the husbtnd r-nay c\relr bc urorc far-cilablc to her than hcr o*'n nxt1ol1al
lav: llcsiclcs. sirc shotrld aL'eaci1. knorv t'hl[ thc husbanci's nxtionxl lfl\\i
fro111
(3)Thcspollsesar:ciointlr'resllor-rsibleforti-reSuPP()ftofth('
famrlr- (Art. 70' id
(2)
MARRIACE
CONFLICTSRUL6SO[
dishonor.
c-rr:
ir-riui'r'
profcssion' occuPxuoo'
otiler' lhc
busrness, or actrvitt'' wlthout the consent of the
qrouncls
latter nlav ob;ect only orl valicl' serit>tls' atlcl moral
('\rt.
73. id';
rvife' rvhat
6. Going now to the propertv relations of husband and
Some excepuons to the lbove rulc rvould bc, if tl're national lar.v
of tl're irusband violatcs the pubhc polio' of the [otr-un, or the national
larv of tl're t'rfc happens to be the larv of the forum. rntended as it is to
pr()tcct the wife's rigi-rts.
tire sPouscs
For the saffIe feaso,l th;rt tlle persoual relatrons of
if tirev are of differcnt
are governccl br. the personal laN of the hnsband
relations' ot 1<'
natilnalties. the same rule also applies ro their ProPert\
tlrc prt,pern l'('gllll(' that guverrrs lhctr tllrttagc'
of husband and
in tlre ?}rilrpprnes,
tl-re proper.q.
stnce we foilorv tlre natronalin. dleorr;,
reladons
of thc spouses
If
r-'f
thatoncoithespousesrsaliiliprno;rr-rdt1-reot,hef.andjen,sdl]1)1ri|lp-ptnc
-fl'ris.rvas the rntcutton ot,ttl'
ialv rvill govcrn tl-rerr pr,opctn relauons
(,ode. consrderir-rg tl-rat ln mtlst mtxed
S2
CONFLICTSRULESOFMARRIAGE
CONFLICTOFLAWS
If both sPouses
are:
the srrsre'r
regime of the
husband or the wife ot both, the originai Property regime that Prevailed
at the startof their marriage prevails. The reasons for this doctrine are:
mantal peace in the spouses' ptoperty telations is more or less guaran-
teed; the sPouses will not be able to preiudice creditots, who in nrm
cannot leopardlz.e the interests of the spouses; and even the spouses may
protect themselves from each oth.4 0 Rabef Conflict of l,aws, pP. 453, 354)
8. Is immutability of the property regime of the spouses the same
CONFLICTSRULESOFMARRIAGE
83
Fa'rlh'code
settiement irave
a marnage
as
CONFLICT OF LAWS
C.
1.
is thc renredv
if thc
remedy
if
r,i
lt
ll'
'fhc chilcllcn
are legidnratc
,f
annulnrcnt.
of
the spouses.
On the othcr
l-rar-rd.
co-ownership
(see
l'i
64
CONFLICT OF LAWS
CONFLICTSRULESOFMARRIAGE
votcl
(5)'l.hcnauiagccal]suiibctt-t.rprtgtrcdevcnal.tcrtlrcdcatlrclt
the spouses.
(tlll
If
the
the marriage is null and void or au absolute nullity, can
CONFLICT OF LAWS
Tl-re above article also protects tl-re spouse who behe'cs that
his
marriage
rs null and void fr'm being crrarged rvitir brgamv
or her
if he or
she marries agar'. because tirerc would alread. be a iudicral declarauon
of the nullirr- oi
l-us
thrs
provision is retroactir.c.
Tirus. a marr{age void for lack of a marriage iicense still neecls a
judicial deciaradon of nulltrl before the patries can mary again (Repubtit t.
C.,4. and Cairo. 2j6 SCLL4 257: Doningo u. C.,,1., 226 SCk4 57e. khas
also been held that .uvhere a party contracts a second marriage on the
mere l>elief that his or her spouse is alreadv dead u'ithout fiiing n
sulnllary procceding under Art. 41 of the Farnilt' Code, the second
marriage is bigarnous and void (lr)auarro u. Domagtoy. 259 SCk'1 124.
3. Vhat are the conflicts rules on annulment and declaration of
nullity of marriage?
In Conflrct of Larvs. the grounds lor annulment of marriage,
and tl.rose for the declaration of nulliry oi rnarriage, are the grounds
provided for by the lau' alleged to have been violated which,
irr
general, ts the 1r.v /aci ce/ebralionz.r' or the law of the place where tl're
rnarriage rvas celebrated, rvith certain exceptions. Tire reason is this:
Considenng drat it is thc iex iorz tv/ebratiarzi that is usually applied to determine
whether a rnarriage is valid or not, it is the same law that also determines
rvhetl.rer a marriage is voidable or not, and r.vhether it is vord or not.
T'lius, if Filrpinos get married abroad, the /rx loci ce lebrationi.r rvlll
determine the Erounds for annulment (Art 2(r. Farnily Code). For
MrattlrefrarnersoftlieFanrilr'Criclervat.rte.]rr.astbrilPe|Soll
the
l1ot to assulne tirnt hts or her tnurilge is null antl void' ct'cn if such bc
oii-rrs
cleclaratiou oi the nulht|
fact, but he or she musr Frrst seek a
ludrcial
Supreme Court to the effr:ct that rvhere a marriage is illegal or void from
its
n() itrdicral declee ts n('ccssllt'\ to estrblislr rts inval-rdin'
perform:irtcc.
Q)e,oph u. lv4endoia.
rt
Pl'il. E1j;
PrcDlc
r" '\rt'ian'
100
Phit' l03i)'
example, two Filipinos get married in England. Let us assurne that sterihw
abroad. tlre grounds are the exceptions to tlte lax loti teiebralionit rn Art. 26
o[
t]re Familv Code; namelyi Articies 35 (l), (1), (5), and (6);36, 31,and
38.
CONFLICTOFLAWS
CONFLICT OF LAWS
86 CONFLICTSRULESOFMARRIAGE
t-rtn s)
rnarriages benveen Chris
an d
univelslllt
tnces tuor-ts
fiIarrlages'
dre
cir"se
ti.sto t'.
as
ij
t,
$i
to take cognizance
";;;t;*t
ln the
can also hle sr-rcir suits
Domrciharics of tlie Pirihppines
Phfippirres.
dotntc :ile
the courts of tire parues'
greatest
'"
hle a case
Iriliplno ciflzcn or domiciliar'r'can
if the defendant
o[ nulliry of marrtage even
status of
for annulrnen' o' attttJ'*on
petsonal
i'-"'olit the
In the Philrppines'
tn'"'
non-residt"'of tt"o.'ntrv'
can be-acqtrired over
the plalnuff n'-'a to' 1o'i'Acflon
tlill,,lrl
Such
rs a
CIil
pubrictuon o f ^""''*Jl'
?"' l:- c
*.. oi.o Sec 6' nerv Rule on Declarauon
on Ma'v 15' 2t)03)'
Matriage which took effect
tl-re
defcndant by
;:f#i;X*;
in
)5)8
,t19t4'l)
Order No.
1.11
Catholic populauon
during the
iarv in force tn the Philrpprnes
(1) The Siele Partidts't\e
o[ Spain'
Code
Cilrl
on divotce
(2) Later' the provisions
J4.l:ruti-
(6) Act No. 2710 was later repealed by the Neu' Civil Code,
wirich allows and recognized onlv legal separation. The draft of the
Code had provisi<-rns on divorce, but during the discussiohs over the
draft of the Code in Congress and with the strong opposrtion of the
D. ABSOLUTE DIVORCE
1'
or
over cases for annulment
4. What courts have iurisdiction
declaration of nullity of mariage?
Since we
u.
Jann.60 Phil.a{1
(3) On N{arch 11, 1911 , a Divorce Law (Act 271Q was passed
87
nrarrlage^s:
oPpl)' tt'consulal
Tire above rules do not' howe\'er'
o[ tire parues'
ot iaw oi the domicile
to rvhich eithet the n^u"lli'i"*
CONFLICTSRULESOFMARRIAGE
Sparn
of
Filipino spouse can also remarr) (Sec par. , Art. 26, Famih Code)
88
CONFLICT OF LAWS
CONFLICT OF LAWS
CONFLICTSRULESOFMARRIAGE
CONFLICTSRULESOFMARRIAGE
#,
89
I
E
of
as
Filipino
":/98E).
as he was
t
^g:n
In the United
(2)
with
Van
Dotn
In
the American husband of Alice Reves, and thc latter, obtained a divorce
in Nevada, U.S.A. Thereaftcr, Alice Reyes marrie d agarn in Nevada. Later,
Upton came back to tire Phihppines and claimed that a business in the
name of ALce Reves was their conjugal properfir and that the latter should
render an accounung and let hirn managc sard business. The Suprerne
Court held that the drvorce obtuned b1, Upron frorn ,\hce rcleased rhe
latter from their marriage, and Upton had no legal standrng to sue Alice
(4)
In
dre Phfippines,
if both
"In
as much as
LUNI.LII
(JI LAW5
CONFLICT OF LAWS
90
DTVORCE
E. LEGAL SEPARATION OR RELATIVE
1.
CONFLIC TS RULES OF
MAI{RIAGE
91
CONFLTCTSRULESOFMARRIAGE
from bed
U"ta
"--"a
et
annulment of marriage'
2. Distinguish legal sePatation from
in annullegal separation, the marriage is not defective;
ment, the marriage is defective'
(a)
In
@)
in
In legal separation' the gtounds arise after the martiage;
annulmengthegtoundsmustexistatthetimeoforbeforethecelebration
of the
marri4ge.
to each other
(c) In legal separation' the parties are still marded
and the
aside
is set
and cannot remarry; in annulment, the matriage
parties can marry again'
the
legal sepatation' the grounds ate those given by
inasmuch
concerned,
parties
nationailaw ot the aomiclliarv law of the
(d)
In
forannulmentarethosegivenbythelexlocicelebrationli,subiectto
certain excePtions.
3. What ate the
(a)
If
of
@)
*.
If
.\rt.
grounds available
the parties arc of different nationalities, the
8).
5. Is
under the personal law of the husband as welr as those avaiiable u'dcr
tire larv of tl-re wrtt are ali availabie grounds for granung the leeal
internal larr
of the Philippines?
(1) Repeated phvsical r'iolence or grosslv abusive conduct against
92
CONFLICTSRULESOFMARIUAGE
CONFLICT OF LAWS
of tnore tiran
CONFLICTOFLAWS
Vhat is the prescriptive period for the filing of the action in the
Philippines?
r'ears
9. Can the wife drop the name of the husband after the decree of
legal separation?
No. because therr are still married. And this is truc wl-rether she is
t}-re
As heid tn Ltperal u. Repuhitc,6 SCl..1 J57. tl'te wrfe who has been
gtanted legai separation cannot petiuon to be allowed to revert to her
marden name.
or
survive?
"
dis it
personal one.
d:.;;;;;;;
spouse?
from
93
11.
of the petitioner
8.
CONFLICTSRULESOFMARRIAGE
she is drsqualified
ftom inheriting
New
civil code, stating that "in case of legal separation, if the surviving spouse
gave cause for the separation, he or she shalr not have any of the
nghts
CONFLICT OF LAWS
CONFLICT OF LAWS
STATUSOFCHILDREN
95
CHAPTER
STATUS OF CHILDREN
A. LEGITIMACY AND ILLEGITIMACY
1.
insemrnation
of children?
What are the conflicts rules in determining legitimac;-
5.
If
lf
lau of
rhe percnts are of different nattotraiiues' tl-Ie Pcrsonal
are:
goverfls.
(3) To be entrtled to the legiume and otl-rer successionai rights
under Philippine
2. Who are legitimate and illegitimate children
internal
law?
eacl-r
of
the parent's
..clrildrenconcetvedorborlrdurrngt}remarriaqeoftl.reparents',;u'lrile
estate divided bv dre number of legltimate cirildren (Art. 888, Nev' Cn'il
Code); while in intestate succession. iegrumate children inherit equallv (pcr
rilegiumatechildrenaredefinedbvtl-,..,'....drngArt.165as..children
x unless otherwise
conceived and born outside a valid, marrlage' xx
upita) v;rthout distinction as to age or sex, and even if they spnng from
different marriages (Art 979. id.)
96
CONFLICT OF LAWS
STATUSOFCHILDREN
CONFLICT OF LAWS
An.
176
of
che
of
the mother;
of
legitimate child.
Remembet that under the new Rep. Act No. 9255' illegitlmate
chi-ldren may now use the sufname of the father "if ther affiliation has
been expressly recognized by the father through the recotd of birth
appearing in the civil regrster orvrhen an admission in a public document
or private handwritten instfument is made by the father" dudng the iatter's
lifetime.
5. What lawgovetns the rights and duties between parent and child?
If
if
will be apphed
1.
the mother;
(3) To suppott in conformir,v \\'lth this Code;
(4) To the legrtime, which is one-half of the iegtime
97
B. LEGITIMATION
STATUSOFCHILDREN
(R.abel, id.).
children?
Our internal law on legfurnadon of children
to 182 of the Familv Code.
rs
fore or after theil rnarriage, is no ionger necessary under the Familv Codc,
because this Code has deletcd recogrrition ofnatural children and alreadv
conFers on legrtimate and illegitimatc children their status at the moment
of btth. Chtldren that fali under Art. 177 of the Family Code are, therefore, ip.ro -farto legitimated upon the subsequent marriage of the parents
no matter how lonE a period of ume has elapsed from tl-re birtl'r of said
children to the time oF the matnage of tI-reir parents.
(See also comments by this samc author on Arts. 177 tr,r
98
CONFLICT OF LAWS
STATUS OF CHILDI(Li\
CONFLICT OF LAWS
STATUSOFCHILDREN
99
tl.re Famtlr,
bv former Pres. Corazon Aqurno on December 11 ,1986 regardrng nonresident aliens u'ho were aiiou'ed to adopt under pD 6L)3.
Under the Famil,v Code. aliens v!'ere not allowed to adopt in tirc
Art. 18.+ (3) thereof. and
non-resident a[ens were allowed to adopt FiLpino children oniv under
the iau' on Inter-Countr,v Adoption (Republic Act No. 8043) which wa.
signed by former Pres. Fidel V Ramos on.]une 7 7995 Under this law, tl.re
adoptlon proceedings are to be heid in tire home countrv of the adopters.
PhrJrpprnes anvmore except those reterred to rn
legrumauon".
(d) StlX later. on Februarv 25, 1988, former Pres. Ramos signed
Republic Act No. 8552, other-wise known as the "Domestic Adoptron
lau'?
domestic adoption.
T'hev have dre same rights as legltrmate chrldren
(1)
(2)
Ib
'Io
r legiumate
Note: In
legitrmate niece.
it is "thc
have lost them. may have tire solace and joJ's of parenthood. and ti-rat thc
ma1,
Phi/. 241).
C. ADOPTION
1.
of
bl
child.
legitimated daughter
ascendants, and in
on
las'on adopuon vas PD 603 (the Child and )buth \ielfare Code), which
erpresslv repealed all the provisions oi tl-re Nerr,' Civil Code on adoption.
(b) PD 603 was later amended br,Execudve Order No. 91 signed
Ref>ublir'
98
Phit.66r.
'Adopuon is thus given a sociai and morai purposel that is. to
e stend to the orphan or to the child of the indigent, the incapacitated ol
CONFLICT OF LAWS
lOO STATUSOFCHILDREN
of adoption
has
(b) If dre child does not reside in the countrv of his citizenship,
the personal iaw of the adopter u'tll govern, or the personai lau' of the
adopter and that of the cirild wrll be applied concurrentl\,.
CONFLICT OF LAWS
STATUSOFCHILDREN
101
alleged cases of Filipino childten who, after ha'ing been adopted br,
foreigners, were killed for organ transplants in the fore4gr homes of theu
adopters. Hence, the Commrttee believed that bv limrung adopuon of
Frirprno children by al.iens to former FrJrpino ciuzens (and/or the6 spouses)
of the adoption?
(1) They have the same qualifications
oi
of
entered;
(a) They
5.
matter?
as tirose required
(5)
of Quesuon No.
the Civil Code of the Phrhppines did not allon' non-resident aliens to
adopt, PD 603 liberalized rhe Civil Code provisions on adoption and
allorved even non-resident aliens ro come to the Phdtppines and adopt
our childrer-r here.
(b) The Farnilr Code, howei'er, became strict in adoption of
aliens rn the Phiirppines because
Acl
8552).
1 hereof, rvhiie
tirat drafted the Code (of rvhich this author was a member) that some
Filipino children adopted bv aliens and brought bv the latter to their
home countries suffered culrural and psr,chologrcal shocli ar.rd could not
adiust to theil neu'hves in the foreign countries of their ioreign adopters.
AIso. rnformauon was received that old alien pedophiles. after iravrng
been allou'ed to adopt Fihprno children in thc Phrlppines, rvould. aitet
bringing said children to tireir home conntries. simply abandon these children after tl'rev had satisfred their sexual destes on them. There rvere even
rO2
CONFLICT OF LAWS
STATUSOFCHILDREN
not Lmit the degree of consanguinin' betu'een tl.re adopter and adopted
child. On the otirer irand. Sec. 7(b) of Rep. Act 8552 includcs children
related within the 4tir degree of afhnin' to rhe adoprlng parenr. which
relationslrip of afhnin was nor included in Art. 184 of the Famiiv Code.
This author cannor understand, though, whv Rep. Act 8552 rn
the above prol-ision hmits the degree o[relauonshrp bv consanguinlfl, 6f
rhe adopter and tire adopted child onlv ro rhe 4rh degree, This means that
a former Filipino would not be able to adopt the child of his or her hrst
coustn (5th degree) or his or her second cousrn (6th degree). Since the
relative bl'
blood, who is now an alien, can glve to the child once the latter is brought
to the adoptert foreign home, it is irnmarerial how close thev are related
by blood.
if
Act
S'TATUS OF
Sec.
can
7 (b) of Rep.
8552
But, Rep. Act 8552 still requires that husband and wife must
jointly adopt, rvhich joint adoption was also required br. the Famih.
Code, except when one spouse seeks to adopt his or her own illegrttmate
child, or when one spouse seeks ro adopt tl.re iegiumate child of the other
spouse (Art. 185, Famii,v Code). Republ-ic Act 8552 adds tl.rat in cases
where the spouses are legally separated (Act. 7, sec. par., sub. par. {iii}).
the husband or tl-re wlfe can adopt alone, and the consenr of the othel
spouse to an adopuon Frled by one spouse is no longer necessarv.
CHILDREN
TO3
of adopuon
as folior,r's:
appll if the adopted child and the adoptet or adopters had left
(Secs. 16, 17, 18, ReP.
6. The cases
No more
CONFLICT OF LAWS
a will.
Act 8552)
8. There are
t0)
(a) The capaciry and tght of the adopter to file a petition for
adoption, are governed bv the law in force at the time the petitron is filed,
and cannot be impaired bv a new iaw disquahfuing lrrm or her for adoption
IO4
SIATUSOFCHTLDBEN
CONFLICT OF LAWS
CONFLICT OF LAWS
CHAPTER
This is particulady tme if both the adopter and the adopted child
of the Forum that decreed the adopflon (R-abel,
id., p. 6a7).
10. Does adoption confer on the adopted
the adopter?
No, adoption does not confer on the adopted child the citizenship
of the adopter. Adopuon is a matter politicai. and not civil, in nature, and
the ways in which tt should be conferred lav outside the ambit of the
Civil Code (LIgt l)ndanand Tberkehen u Republir. I 2 SCk4 400; aho Ching
L-eng u. Galang, L-/ 1931, 2i OcL 195E.
for the transmission of successional nghts; the unitary or single system, and the split or scission svstem.
Under the unitary or single system, onll' one iaw determtnes
transmission of real as well as personal properties. In countries following
the nationality theory like the Phfippines, the national iaw of the deceased
governs the transmission of both real as well as personal propertles,
while in common iaw countries or countries that follow the domicihan'
theorl', it is the law of the domicile of the deceased that governs.
However, under the split or scission system, which England
the
and
Uruted States adopt, succession to real property is governed bv
the /ex itat, sAt:ie succession to movable or personal proPerw is governed bv the law of the domicile of the deceased at the time of hls death.
I06
wtLLs,
SUCCESSION , and
ADMINISTRATION
107
CONFLICT OF LAWS
in the
of tl-re
testator and the forrn o[ the will (whether orai or wrltren, pubhc or
pnvate instrumen!. notarial or hoiographrc. the nulxber o[ wrtnesses.
etc.),
-fhus,
and
solemnities "
3.
oI
rvills.
of wills?
(a) if a Filipino makes a will abroad, ire mav cornply with the
formalities of Philippine law (lex nationalit) ot the lex loci nlebrationi.r (the
larv of the place rvhere ire was at the time of the execuuon of tire wili
l.\rt. 815, Neu' Cir.il Code).
T'hus, a FiJrprno docror u'orking in Neu']brli rnav execute a will
rn accordance with Philippine iaw 01 New lbrk lauz
Code), or tlre
The New Civil Code applies tlte lex nationalii of the decedent irr
par. 2 of its Art. 16. This was also followed b)' the SuPreme Court in
As
Midano
If
validity of willsl
Be//u'
r.
of
another countrv.
if
In civil law countries hke tire Phihppines. the nauonal larv of the
108
CONFLICT OF LAWS
at the rime
of
CONFLICTOFLAWS
or
of revocation
(/ax
(b)
If
domicile and irrs domrcile at rhe time of l-ris death are different,
which law applies? Common sense and logrc should applv
the law of the domrcile at the time of the testatork death'
with the policv of respecung the will of the testator, provided that this
can be ascertained.
savs
10.
procedural, so that the lav"'of the forum applies to all procedural matters.
(b) If the revocation is done in the Phihppines, tt is valid if made
in accordance with the provisions of our Civil Code (Att 829' id')'
the revocation is done outside the Philippines bv a Person
who is domiciled here, it rs yalid if made in accordance with our law (the
tex d.onirzli) or the /cx ioti actu of the revocauon (the place u'here the
revocaoon was made) (see Art . 17 , pzr- 1. New Civil Code)'
(c)
if
(c) Under Art. 838 of the first paragraph of the New Civil Code,
"no will shall pass either real or personal properry unless it is proved and
allowed in accordance wrth the Rules of Court".
110
CONFLICT OF LAWS
CONFLICTOFLAWS
validlr. executed u'ills is requted bv pub[c poiiq,. tl-re State could not havc
intended the Starure of Limrtauons to defeat said pohct (,Gueuata t. Gaeuara.
'CR L-5105,
.lan. )/. / 956;.
(e) Wills proved and aliowed in a forergn countr\! according to
the laws of each counnv. may be allowed, frled. and recorded by the
proper court in the Philippines (Rule 77, sec. 1, Revised Rules of Court).
(f Although
in a forergn
countr\, it still has to be reprobated in the phiiippines in accordance with
our procedural lau; because a foreign judgment, no matter how intnnsicallv
of the probate
abroad.
11.
SCk4 724.
of
domrcde is called
in othet counfties whete the deceased also left properties, is called ancillary
administration.
(g) As held by the Supreme Court inTajtagu. Bengaet Consolidated,
deceased persons?
111
(f
(g) The evidence necessary for the probate or allowance of wills
12.
of Laws?
(a) Bv "adminisrration" is meanr the process of determiniog and
realizing the assets of a deceased person, the pavment of tl-re debts of the
estate. and the actual drstr-rbution of the residue ro the heirs.
the deceased had properties but left no heirs and no will, how
can the country where the ptoperties are located claim said ProPertles?
If
is
112 WLLS,
CONFLICT OF LAWS
CONFLICT OT LAWS
hence, thev should revert to the state uzhere thev are situated bv escheat.
in
the Philipprnes and some civil iaw counuies, the theory adopted
is that the State is the last het of a deceased person. Hence, the State
succeeds to the propercies left bv sard deceased as an heL.
E
CHAPTER
in the Philippines but with no heirs and no vdll. If we apply Art. 16, par.
2 of the New Civil Code, the national law of the deceased appl-ies to his
succession, and if Chinese law- provides that the home state of the
PROPERTY
deceased (China) inherits as his last heir, China can claim said properties
and business interests for itself.
The Phitippines can, howevet, claim said properties and business
interests, by adopting the.theory of "caduciaq' dghts" of the State. This
is in consonance with the proposition thar in a situation such as this, "rules
of conflict of lav;s are largelv abandoned and each country eppears to
work on the principle of seizing all property of tle deceased lying within
its borders"; i.e., the Philippines should regard said prcperties as ownerless or bona uacaxtia.In short, the properties pass to the Phiiippines as an
incident of soverergnty, not as afl heir @lackt Law Dictionary, Abridged,
5th ed., p. 92).
L.
sitae. r.e.,
ir.f...r"i
..al prop"i.n rrrus, tire 1u*
;i-;;;;..ff"::'::',1.1.*tm respe*
e
very thin
logrcal' 'As
on
c e
rn
er tai n
qi
expectations
predic
of
to
ta bil*i;
the parues,
rop er n.. +
.1:
,r.in!
to
pir.",;6ri"iii*'
the /ex i/u.,.of real
;;,il;;;'
,, d.oL;;;i'rr.i
r; ; ;-" ;
0 n a m, s in c e
p er s o n d p
personal effects or b.longings
^H
of the
Laq
J-1'l5"io-.nal
iJTff T J ^,X."t::,:l'jffi
p en
ro
re a r p
t'e pr'ce'whe'e
the
p.
proo.rq,.
,
Personal properq,' or
o: r
rr:;::
"on
rff :.:,:
": : ;;r^:
"a;lr;
b.."
Recendy, in ma
^d;;;;;ft;'r#:t
has at.so
:il;;;;:;;il^i;1Tl:1i.#::":#lT:*11ili.ff::,i:l
114
CONFLICT OF LAWS
PROPERTY
created over personal properues to have those nghts enforced and made
effecuve 0il,blff. rd.). As the place wi'rere tl.re ProPerties are located has
the iegal and coetctve power to enforce sald rlghts, the lex .rltu.t or tlex rei
sitae zpphes to said properues (Goodricir, Confuct of Laws, p 470;.
CONFLICTOFLAWS
USA.
of tire rransacuon
governed bv tire iex itus (Floidalawi.
(a) The exrnnsic validrn'
Fiorida Law
(b) Tire rntinsic validiry of the transaction
Civil Code?
The late Senator Lorenzo M. Tanada, Chairman of the Special
Committee on the Neri" Civrl Code, explained thc reason thus: "Now
that there has been a great increase in the amount and variew ofpersonal
properfi, not immediateli' connected with the person of the owner, it
was deemed advisable bv Congtess of the Philppmes to adoPt the doctrine
<:f iex rci ilae also to movables"
been held that personal Properrv mav be separated
from its owner, wiro mav be taxed on its account at the piace where the
property is located. althougl'r ire is not a domrciiiarn citrzen or resident of
tlre state which imposed the tax (L4anila Ga.t Cor. u. Colleclor, 62 Phi/' 89r.
In fact, the concept of movabie proPern, has so grown in tl-re Philrpprnes
that even lntangible properties like sltares of stock in a corporation'
franchises, credits and tl-re like are nou' considered movable propern'
although thev have no phvstcal or materiai srtus.
4. What matters connected
Iex situs?
Flonda
of Art.
80
of
ot lex tei
The exceptions to the application of the lex itus ot lex rei silae
with respect to real properties are the foliowing:
(1) Succession: In civil law countries iike the Phrjlppines' testate
and intestate succession, vrhether the properties are real or
personal and wherever thev tnav be located' is governed by the
natlonal iaw of the deceased, not the lex sitas. including the order
of succession, the amount o[ successional nghts' and dre intrrnsic
vahdrr,v of testamentarv disposiuons (Art' 16, par. 2, New Civil
Code).
Capacrw to succeed is also governed
the deceased (Arr 1039. id.).
bl
of
iex.ri/u.;.
is govemed bv
the lex
3. Vhat was the reason given for the change of rule in the New
the
are govetned by
law
where ir rs situated''.
l-ras
(the formalitres) is
properw
lndeed, it
PROPERTY II5
of
115
CONFLTCT9FLAp5
PROPERTY
CONFLICTOFLAWS
If
in possession)
and has a fixed sirus, there rs no problem. But there are many different
kinds of personal properties that do not have hxed situs, like those that
are usually in mouon or have changrng sirus (e.g., vessels and goods in
transit). or intangrble personal properties like rights and shates of stock in
a corporation which, because they have no material existence, do not also
have material or tangible sirus.
(1)
PROPERTY I77
follows:
(2) The aforesaid personal properties which are usually in
mouon or do not have tangrble existence are thus given artificial or
usually in motion?
temporary situs.
118
CONFLICTOFLAWS
PROPERTY
CONFLICTOFLAWS
PROPERTY
119
a.
Summerr,44 pbit.
i0,
tl-re
id .PP l8l-282)'
loci uolantatis
(1)
or not
or
/ex bci
(d) Franchises:
of
r2O
CONFLICT OF LAWS
PROPERTY
(See Menenrieiu
tradenames, and
servicemarks:
CONFLICT OF LAWS
(.6\
PROPERTY I21
ln
Philtps Erporr
B.It.
u,
tigirt ro
(7) Speaking
of
jn Enera/d
of
the
^ny
forcrgn
country which
CONFLICT OF LAWS
CONFLICTOFLAWS
CONTRACTS
123
of contracts?
CHAPTER
M
CONTRACTS
1.
Sec. 9
of the place
where the
of
Laws?
of
execution?
some service".
Although
transactions.
CONFLICI OFLAWS
CONFLIC-T OF LAI,VS
CONTRACIS
124
wiren the
x1s'
wav oi other excePtlons
established and rmportant
an
contravenes
ctr lu loti ielebrationi't
to
it wouid work gross injusuce
to
pohcv of tt-" toru-; or
mores'
^PPI\;
bonot
i*"*; orli tire ftan'saction is contra
the people tr
(c)
'i"
B. CAPACITY OF PARTIES
of the
in determining the capacitv
What are the conflicts rules
contract?
Parties to a
contracts is generalll'
(a) Capacrn' to enter lnto
gc,l':t"td
-:'i^'n'
ln
the natlonti larv of the parues
tiril is
personal la'r' oi tire O^'Jt"
ff
the domrcile
theorl" and bv tl-re law of
countries followrng the nadona[w
conff2cts
tl-'et'rv' Excepuons are
in countries r"["*"g t;Jt"ttiiiti"u
botl.r reai and
of p'op"'ties'
involving aliet'otioriot encumbranct to'lt'"cttng parties is governed
tl-tt
in which *'"t t^p*'* t'f
personal,
bl
in the
llilpp,n.,t1,::.^':?:'[,il;r:T".,,
governed Dr I
thrt cepaciw of I Frirprno ls
theort''
b".nrr.. ve folion' the nadonaliry
(b)
2'
725
what law will govern the incapacitv of the alien in the following
specific problem?
3.
13v
Remembettit"'ft"t""tcementolaforeignlavrsonlvamatt:r
to comlq''
cases arc clear excepuons
of conuq" and tire foregorng
1.
CONTRACTS
* iJ:i::
No, because to apply the narional }aw (or iaw of dre domicile)
of the alien in determining his capacity ro conftac would require Fil_ipinos
to fust ascertain what the personal law of thar alien is. sometimes with
great difficulry such drat busjaess uansactions.xrith aliens would be greatly
impeded.
sPecific Problem?
c()nffact (RcP'
hct has dre capacin'to
No. llc<:ause r'rnclcr l)hil' latrr
tt'tt;^1-L:.]'ot
t. 18 vears)' 11
6809 has rcclucecl
tot"'^t' of Filipinos is govetned
";';:';;;;;"q
capacifi'
Phrhpprncs pror'ides that
the
bv therr nattonlrl
hw
'o
of
Code)
the age
into a contract in ltaiv where
A 20-vr' old Filiprno enters
ltalian
under
plead irrs incapacin
cii maiorrtv i' 21 ;' ;:;ililer
contract?
under tht
ceiebralionu) to avoid [abiiiw
Iau' (tr"lrich is the /rr ioct
If
performance
1.
or the
126
CONFLICTOFLAWS
CONTRACTS
CONFLICTOFLAWS
CONTRACTS I27
wiren the change is so revoluuonarl' that it could never have been contempiated bv tl-re parues Oiblff. supra. zl30--131).
(c) Several laws mav be selected. each o[ which u'ill govern ti-r
different elements of the transacuon (Chesirue, Private International Lau,
p.236)
(')
A.,.Gff;::T#::f;ilffi
/;;i;ci
ntu'ln ni:
In the Phil-rPPines:
(c)
of lav'applicable to
their.contractssuchtermsandconditionsaStheymaydeem
\\hile
ti.re parttes
1e0
are?
p) If the law selected should change' rt ls the new law that should
law can
be applied, for it may be presumed that the Parties knew that
^l.,uou.
no connection
(a) Generally, the parties cannot select a law that has
at all
(e) Assuming that the law ol the place of performance can be ascertained, (as when it is expressly agreed upon b1' tlie parties), still, quesuons
of substantral and essentral vahdtry (such as whether the contract is valid'
t'oi.dable, or void) should be governed by the proper ia.r" o[ the contract.
Onlv minor details (such as the time of ptvment during busrness houts)
should be governed by the law of performance (Chesite, supra)'
iaw that has the most substantial connection widr the transaction,
by the
or the law that may be presumed to have been intended
in
2. But there should be limitations to the court's choice-of-law
what
determining the intrinsic validity of contracts' Can you state
thev
(d) If under the selected law, the contract is legal. but in the place of
performance, it rs illegal, the selected law should prevail and the contract
should be considered legal (II Rabel, supta, p.537). Orherwise, the place
of performance, which couid be merely accidental, wili control. Besides,
the place of performance mav be different under different larvs fWolfi,
supra. p. 135)
b.
is'
chanped as times and condiuons change' The exception
of
scK+e2.
clause.
of iudgment).
coNFLIcroFLAws
CONFLICT OF LAWS
12S CONTRACTS
coNTRAcrs
5. Lease
of
.Jn..:
wili apply
2. Lease of properry:
c!
If it creates
b
L]
$*
contracts applies.
(a)
If
conuact.
such declaration
Unes
I{
a.
rclebrationi.r
4. Conuact of loan:
in gencral:
kx .rilat
/ut inlenlnni.t
it rs commodatum, appiy the lex situt because it is a real
t2g
(b) But
SCk4
if
j6 (t 994.
*.
b",_
Nortbwett oient,4ir_
*" .roi..
ol
tT**a
SCLA
ltiprqr.'p"r2;,-;;
ajt
255 SCRA 3S
(7
e96).
CONFLICT OF LAWS
CONFLICTOF LAWS
F"
('
A
,
=
L'
.'t
4rt.2176 of the same Code, on the other hand, tetains the Spanish
concept of cupa aqailiana ot quasi-dtlict. It provides:
.l
131
CHAPTER
TORTS
t
.t
tn
<.
E
TORTS
person or proPerry
"Tort" is a legal wrong cornmitted uPon
independent of contract^
(a) Liabfity for torts in general is govemed by the /ex loci delicti
commbii; i.e., the lav of the place where the delict or wrong was
(a)
or
-.t
aqailiano
committed.
@) Reasons
of contract'
damage to anothet. independent
through
It covers aII cases where
do so; i'e'' unintentional wrongs'
negligence, or with no tntentiorto
a
(1) The state where the social disturbance occutted has the
damage to another
Person causes
of the rnjury;
for it
"tort"-has a broader'meaning'
(c) In American lavi however'
through negligence' but also
covers legal wrongs toi o"fy commrtted
willfi:l tntent' but of course' independent
those committed with *^Utt t'
covered by
of conftact and
of conffact' Otherwise, it *tt U" breach
another field of law, conuact law
and
(2) To compensate
suffered.
2.Vhatistheconcept'of'(tott''inthePhitippines?
ddictik:
132
CONFLICTOF LAWS
CONTLICT OF LAWS
TORTS
TOf,TS ur3
onasueet-instate\lThelocusdclictirsStateX'because
Held:
that wrthout an
wrongfui act became effecgve The reason is
necessit\ fot
no
is
injurf the,. is nothlflg to ptotect and there
;udicral telief'
the
Example: In the above examPle under par' (a)'
locus dzlicti is State
Y'
which has
wtongful act'
the most substanrial connecdon wlth the
Example: The situs of the radio station whete
]ibelousbroud.".tismadeisr\elonsdzlicti,evenifthe
broadcast is heard in manv Places'
5.
in determining
is, some modern theories have been developed
liabitity for totts. Please state what thev are'
(a) The
de
of 1969' is
ExamPles;
N'Y'2d 47); 191 It'E' 2d 279
lr'{rs' Jackson left New \brk'
and
(96)'' Babcock and Mr'
Mt'Jackson for a
their residence, in the Jackson car driven by
(l)
Babcock u. Jackton,
l2
Canada' Mr'
weekt trip to Canada. \X4rile uaveiing in Ontario'
badly hurt'
was
of the car and Babcock
Jackson lost conttol
134
CONFLICTOF LAWS
TORTS
case
TORTS
135
deJicil.
CONFLICT OF LAWS
of
conduct and
if the latter
oI conduct and financial
in the
de
licti nmmis.riibecause in
of the action
rs governed by
Philippine larg prescripuon is
of
(3) The burden of proof and the defenses drat may be rnterposed
by the defendant are aiso governed bv hx loti de/icti commnit.
"vere
driving a rented car, X ran over \'. rvho was walkrng. causing tl.re latter to
be hospitalized in Hongkong. Upon rhe rerurn of both to the Phiirppines,
/a,r
r/c
hilt ,rtmmit.rii.
sued X for damages adsing from the rott commirted bv the latter
while thev were in l{ongkong. Will tlie action prosper?
Yes, provided rt is hled within dre period prescribed by Flongkong
of prescriptron is subsrantive
and not procedural. The kinds and measures of darrrages recoverable b1Y, and the defenses that X mat' put up, should also be governed bv
Hongkong law, which is rhe lex lott delicti commilsii. But all procedural marrers
hke the period for filtng the answer, the period for appeal. etc., sl-rould be
governed 6v rhe lex./ori. whrch is Phihppine law.
Iaw, dre lzx bci rhlicti tvmmhlii, since the penod
136
CONFLICT OF LAWS
CONFLICT OF LAWS
8. What is thc Alit'rr 'lirrt Act, and do vou know if it has been
applied in cast's lilctl lrr trilipinos in the United States?
ol
in
(b) It was under the above law that the United States Court of
Appeals upheld the jurisdrction of the distnct court of Hawaii over a
class actron for damages filed by almost ten thousand Filipino victims of
human nghts abuses and tortw'e comrnitted bv dre iate President Ferdinand
Marcos and his ofhcials rn the Philippines during the Marcos reglme,
resulung in a nearll US$2 briiion judgrnent in favor of the victims andf or
a.
Marcot-Manotoc, / 25
LEd.
2d 661 ,
17
CRIMES
3 S. Ct. 2958.
1.
(a) Whiie both tort and crime are wrongs, a tort violates pnvare
rights u'hile a crime is committed against the State.
(b) Tort acuons are instituted by the mlured person against dre
ttongdoer
act.
found. Crimes, on the other hand, are iocai and can be prosecute d onlv in
the places or states rvhere the crimes are committed.
2. How does the court determine whether a wrongful act is a tort
or a crime?
The determination of whether a wrongful act is a tort or a cnme
depends on the charactenzation of the act in the state where said act is
committed.
138
CONFLICT OF LAWS
CRIMES
CONFLICT OF LAWS
CRIMES
139
cases?
(a) Territotial theory - Under this theorli the state whete the
crime was committed has juusdiction to tr\: the case, and its penal code
and the penalties prescribe therein rvili apply The teason is that the
aggrreved state is dutl'bound to prosecute and punish the offender as his
state.
(c)
Protective theorv - Anv state whose nacionnl interests
mav be jeopardtzed has lurtsdictron over cnmrnal offenses. even if
comrnitted outside its territorii and in some cases. even if committed
bv an alien.
(0
and by wav
CONFLICTOFLAWS
140 cRlMlrs
CONruCTOFLAWS
CRIMES
141
;rl)l )lt(
(l)
Philippine
(2)
(4)
(5)
Tl'terc aretwo ti-reones that have generally been used, and which
determining
our Supreme Court has appl-ted ln the old opium cases, in
the
emphasizes
Rule
(which
Enghsh
the
this quesuon of iurisdtcuon;
nationality
the
(wi-rrch
stresses
Rule
French
territorial principle) and the
theory).
excePt:
International
of
Sea
CONFLICT OF LAWS
142
CONFLICTOFLAWS
CRIMES
cases:
coastal State;
CHAPTER
Iu
BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS
such cdme does not disturb our Peace and order. Th,rs is similar to the
of
Ftench rule to the effect that we have no iurisdiction over ctimes
committed aboard foreign vessels even if they are found within our
territorial waters except when the crimes affect the peace, order, securiry
and safety of our countty and territory.
A. CORPORATIONS
1.
fie
governing law
of
a corporation?
(1) The theory that the personal law is the law of the
place of itlcorporation:
Under this theory, horvcver. l corporati<rn carr cvaclc rnaul
responsibilitres bv simply orgrnizing irr onc st;rlc and perfbnnrng
its ftrnctions in anotlrer staf e.
(2)
'l'lr
tlrt.orv
CONFLICT OF LAWS
coNFLIcr oF LAWS
.f
BustNESs
ASsoctATIoNS
l4.s
of
tl-re
..whicrr
lc,cated.
piace must be
withrn the Phiirppines". Thus, the place
of incr )rPoralon of a PhrJrppine
corporatlon rs also its domicile.
Mirt
aa t,,. S
t.r
enr. l n t.. l g 9
Cll I
Coun in
C*)i*
tl-reir activitres rn
,";;;;
our counff\,.
in
of
incorporation.
"r'as
organized
rr
as de.falo ursofar
zr
rl corporauon was
^
or d.-relop o.,, ,r^,..rr"'
0f the capriai is Firiprno
pierce
of coryorate rdentin. and go lrrto t1.,.
.the 'eil
controlJrng stockholders to deter'rinc *l-retrrer
a
corporarion.
"^"";;
corporauon is an enem',
.\Ck,1 205).
or
lurtif,
CONFLICI'OF I ,\\VS
6.
Vhat matteis
of the corporation?
9.
a foreign corporation
tire placc ()l rnc()rp()ra[on) governs the tequisttcs for t]re formation of
tire corporatt<)n. thc reclulr'ed nurnber of mcorporators and tire members
,.,f ti.re floard of I)trectors. the kincls of shares of stock aliowed, thc
transfer ()[ stocks in a rval tl-rat it wr>uld be bindrng on ti-rc corporation.
the rssuance, aln()unt and legahw of tirc diviclends, and the powers tncl
duues of the offtcers. stockholders, and mernbers.
7. ttr(/hat law determines the
T'he vahditl
tl.rc
of
Bl
service
of sumrrons
hat purpose;
on:
designated in accordance
wirh
ra*,for
The conrract
which are
<>rdinalv l>ursiness
czisual
lli2l. \ot'.
10. l()6:'\.
11.
l{E
coNrLIcroFLAwa
CONfLICTOFLAWS
"usINEss
allowed to sue on
pines euc?
the cessation
corporatronis rrcense.
6norur, ,rpr^.
local coutt
the forergn
;d;;;:'-::."t1on.
ronues cited, p.
43g).
B. PARTNERSHIPS
1.
Vhen does
.1
partnership exist?
"?'il$ffi il"1i
; ;i'
p;#'
,,"tPttton'
3;
it
ln the phrhpprles.
pers onatity
l_r.j;!"rtnership,
,"g.i.a ;, ;:;.;i.."r
r"Xl;.
.rw-i-.i..', For the purpose
of
of a partnership?
the
Code of Commerce).
countn'#;.";
f its
15
con tra
;;,
For example. in
teg
to contracrs""'entered into
AssocIATIoNs
New
\brk
case wl:ere a
lr.,,
thc partnership,.s
crcated.
CONTLIC-I OF LAWS
CONFLICT OF LAWS
lt,rt
clrt(
f'(
187
'\'S'
of a partnership?
t-:f
dornesnc cor?orauons'
p^rtncI'sl)ll)s ()r:ganlzcd under Phdippine iarv is' Iike
vhcre thel
:,tl_,.
pl^.., rvhcre their legal representation is estabhshed of
cxercisc their princrpal funcuons"'
but
of corporations
5. Are the constitutional limitations on the Powers
also applicable to PartnershiPs?
a partnersirip is
Yes, so that unless at least 609'i' of tl're capital of
development
the
tn
owned bv Fihpinos' tl-re partnersl-rip cannot engage
public utilitres'
and exploitatron of our naturai resourccs' nor operate
in
to
Ntl.lxcntlsctlrc.ar.rtlrolttl'oItlrcrcceir,erison]r.wrdrintlreterrit<>rial
of tlre
l)lrrlrpPln('s, or co-cxtensive vitl-r the ir.rrisdiction
boriDdarit,. rrl'tht'
of tire proper foreign lawl and thc exceptions to the apphcauon of the
proper forergn law or comin'are also appltcable to foreign judgments.
2.
court to
p<-rsitrvelv carr\,'
(b) Enforcernent implies an act of soverergr)t\': rcc(,gnlu()n il)of iustice (Perkin t'. Ilenpae/ C,onrolitktd hlintng(.0..
L-|981-82, May 28, 1951).
volves merelv a sense
152
CONFLICT OF LAWS
RECOGNITIONANDENFORCEMENT
l)hih111rtrrt's.
153
oF FORETGNTUDGMENTS
oi
CONFLICT OF LAWS
lixampleofenforcement:AFitipirrawhoi-radbeendir'orced
bv hcr alicn husband under Art' 26 of the Familv Code and who rvas
to
cle,lcd bv the iocal civil regrstrar a rnarriage license for hct to be able
official
said
n-rarrv agaln, hles an actlon with the proper: court to cornpel
to issue to her a marriage license on thc basis of the divorce decree
obtarned from.her l:v her alien husband'
3.Forwhatreasonorreasonsm^v^localcourtinthePhilippines
refus to recognize or enforce a foreign iudgment?
(a) The requisite
becn prcsented.
have
Rules
J211'
of Court)'
of the forurn.
:;:*::,:,:T':,LT. :"-:"*
In eithcr .n.",
al-,.
:li"""
"'H,
d'lhe ir
rt'1 I rr ,,tt-l t
11.
75)
4.
(:r
I lltllr
ttrtt',t
l"
'trlt'r1tt,rlt'
(l,l Ilr, ;,t,l1,tlt,lll lllllnl ltt "ll;tt11'11 rrl t"ttttltt'tctal matl(:r' n()t
or ordCr under the above rule, and the cffects of such iudgment or
order under the former Sec. 50 of Rulc 39 of thc llevised Rules t,l'
Court, which the foregoing Rule in tlre 1997 Rulcs of Civil Procc'
dure amended?
(a) Under thc forrner Sec, 50
of Rule
39
of
(.(llill
r oNt't
tt I ([,I Aw\
I'rt{ l,rtt lrtrllrltlr ltl tfl rtt4 (t i ,l lilrllrtil(il1 'rl ,r lrrt(.tptt ( Qlltl illroil
?l sl)('( rltr lltttr!'t rt,,r', rrltr,r,lt , lil'rlrlrtt rl r ililr lilrit\,( illxrtl llt(. ltllr. to tlr<.
,r
tlltttt'. lr',rtlltt1,
('1l1lt ( (,ult lr.rrl
11
1, Irttr,ltttl!, itfrttttt,,t
lltrtlrt scr. ,lll. lLulc 1(), ol tlrc l()()/ l{rrlt.:, orr (,tvtl l)ror-t:tlufc,
ltou,t'r''r'r. itll ;rrtl1|ttcltls (,t ()t'(l('rs ol lor<'t1'rr ( oulli\, wllt'llrcr rn rcn ot itl
Penonutt, ilr(' c()nsidrrccl rncrclv fnrnil filtr( ( )r l)r('sunll)lrv(. cvrclcncc of a
right bctwcr:n the partrcs at)d th('rr su(( cssr)ts ut ult('r('st Iry a subse<1ucnt
ude, arrd both kinds of ;udgmcnts,rr('riul)l('('t to tlrc tlrlcnscs of want o[
jurisdrction on tbe part of thc foru:r11r c()rrrt. w,ult o1'notrcc to the defendant or respondent, collusion, fratrrl or t:lt:ar rlrstake of law or [act.
@) The formcr Scc. 50 of Rr.rlc 39 of the Revised Rules of
Court covered only final judgments. Sec. 48, Rule 39, of the 1997 Rules
on Civil Procedure, includes final orders. Both, however, must comply
**************)k*
rer
qn['
'rj'"':?slw
', i. ,r i, l"
CABAIAIUAN CIIY