You are on page 1of 37

Grinding Wheel

Bond

Grinding
wheel

Porosity

Grain
Bond fracture
Microcracks
Workpiece

Attritious wear

Wheel surface

Grain
fracture

FIGURE 9.1 Schematic illustration of a physical model of a grinding wheel, showing its structure and grain
wear and fracture patterns.

TABLE 9.1 Knoop hardness range for


various materials and abrasives.

Common glass
Flint, quartz
Zirconium oxide
Hardened steels
Tungsten carbide
Aluminum oxide

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

350-500
800-1100
1000
700-1300
1800-2400
2000-3000

Titanium nitride
Titanium carbide
Silicon carbide
Boron carbide
Cubic boron nitride
Diamond

2000
1800-3200
2100-3000
2800
4000-5000
7000-8000

Grinding Wheel Types


Grinding face
Grinding face
(a) Type 1straight

(b) Type 2 cylinder

Grinding face
Grinding face
(c) Type 6straight cup

(d) Type 11flaring cup

Grinding faces

Grinding faces

(f) Type 28depressed center

(e) Type 27 depressed center

(g) Mounted

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

FIGURE 9.2 Some common types of grinding wheels


made with conventional abrasives (aluminum oxide and
silicon carbide). Note that each wheel has a specific
grinding face; grinding on other surfaces is improper and
unsafe.

Superabrasive Wheels
Type
1A1

2A2
1A1RSS

(a)

(b)

(c)

11A2
DW
(d)

(e)

DWSE
(f)

FIGURE 9.3 Examples of superabrasive wheel configurations. The rim consists of superabrasives and the
wheel itself (core) is generally made of metal or composites. Note that the basic numbering of wheel types
(such as 1, 2, and 11) is the same as that shown in Fig. 9.2. The bonding materials for the superabrasives are:
(a), (d), and (e) resinoid, metal, or vitrified; (b) metal; (c) vitrified; and (f) resinoid.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Grinding Wheel Marking System


Example:

51
Prefix

Manufacturer!s symbol
(indicating exact
type of abrasive)
(use optional)

A Aluminium oxide
C Silicon carbide

Abrasive
type

36
Abrasive
grain size

L
Grade

Coarse Medium Fine Very


fine
8
220
70
30
10
80 240
36
12
90 280
46
14
100 320
54
16
120 400
60
20
150 500
24
180 600

Soft
Medium
Hard
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Grade scale

Structure

Dense 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Open 15
16
etc.
(Use optional)

Bond
type

23

Manufacturer!s
record
Manufacturer!s
private marking
(to identify wheel)
(use optional)

B
BF
E
O
R
RF
S
V

Resinoid
Resinoid reinforced
Shellac
Oxychloride
Rubber
Rubber reinforced
Silicate
Vitrified

FIGURE 9.4 Standard marking system for aluminum-oxide and silicon-carbide bonded abrasives.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Diamond and cBN Marking System


Example: M
Prefix

Manufacturer!s
symbol
(to indicate type
of diamond)

100

Abrasive
type
B Cubic boron
nitride
D Diamond

100

Grit size

Grade

Diamond
concentration

20
24
30
36
46
54
60
80
90
100
120
150
180
220
240
280
320
400
500
600
800
1000

A (soft)

25 (low)
50
75
100 (high)

to
Z (hard)

B
Bond

1/8
Bond
modification

B Resinoid
M Metal
V Vitrified

Diamond
depth (in.)

1/16
1/8
1/4
Absence of depth
symbol indicates
solid diamond

A letter or numeral
or combination
(used here will indicate
a variation from
standard bond)

FIGURE 9.5 Standard marking system for diamond and cubic-boron-nitride bonded abrasives.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Abrasive Grains
A

Grain

Abrasive grain

Chip

Chip

Wear flat
F

F
v
10 Mm

Workpiece
(a)

FIGURE 9.6 The grinding surface of an


abrasive wheel (A46-J8V), showing grains,
porosity, wear flats on grains (see also Fig.
9.7b), and metal chips from the workpiece
adhering to the grains. Note the random
distribution and shape of the abrasive grains.

Workpiece

(b)

FIGURE 9.7 (a) Grinding chip being produced by a single abrasive


grain. Note the large negative rake angle of the grain. Source: After
M.E. Merchant. (b) Schematic illustration of chip formation by an
abrasive grain. Note the negative rake angle, the small shear angle,
and the wear flat on the grain.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Grinding Variables
Chip length, external grinding
V

Grinding wheel

l=

Grains

Dd
1 + (D/Dw)

t
d
v

l
Workpiece

FIGURE 9.8 Basic variables in surface grinding.


In actual grinding operations, the wheel depth
of cut, d, and contact length, l, are much smaller
than the wheel diameter, D. The dimension t is
called the grain depth of cut.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Chip length, internal grinding


l=

Dd
1 (D/Dw)

Chip length, surface grinding


!
"
4v
d
t=
VCr D

Grinding Parameters
Ridges

Chip

ve
o
ro

FIGURE 9.9 Chip formation and plowing


(plastic deformation without chip removal) of
the workpiece surface by an abrasive grain.

Workpiece

Process Variable
Wheel speed (m/min)
Work speed (m/min)
Feed (mm/pass)

Conventional Grinding
1500-3000
10-60
0.01-0.05

Creep-Feed Grinding
1500-3000
0.1-1
1-6

TABLE 9.2 Typical ranges of speeds and feeds for abrasive processes.
Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.
Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Buffing
1800-3600
-

Polishing
1500-2400
-

Specific Energy in Grinding


Workpiece Material
Aluminum
Cast iron (class 40)
Low-carbon steel (1020)
Titanium alloy
Tool steel (T15)

Hardness
150 HB
215 HB
110 HB
300 HB
67 HRC

Specific Energy
W-s/mm3 hp-min/in3
7-27
2.5-10
12-60
4.5-22
14-68
5-25
16-55
6-20
18-82
6.5-30

TABLE 9.3 Approximate Specific-Energy Requirements for Surface Grinding.

Temperature rise:

! "1/2
1/4 3/4 V
Temperature rise D d
v

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Tension

Residual Stresses

0.10

0.15

4000 ft/min (20 m/s) 400

20

3000 (15)

2000 (10)

220
240

2200
0

0.002
0.004
0.006
Depth below surface (in.)
(a)

MPa

200

0.15

Soluble oil (1:20)


200
20
Highly sulfurized oil
0

220
240

5% KNO2 solution

2200

MPa

60

0.05

2400

260
Compression

Residual stress (psi x 103)

Tension

80

40
Compression

Residual stress (psi x 103)

mm

40

mm
0.05
0.10

280

2600

2100
0

2800
0.002
0.004
0.006
Depth below surface (in.)
(b)

FIGURE 9.10 Residual stresses developed on the workpiece surface in grinding tungsten: (a) effect of wheel speed and
(b) effect of type of grinding fluid. Tensile residual stresses on a surface are detrimental to the fatigue life of ground
components. The variables in grinding can be controlled to minimize residual stresses, a process known as low-stress
grinding. Source: After N. Zlatin.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Dressing
Single-point
dressing diamond
for dressing forms
up to 608 on both
sides of the grinding
wheel

60

Fixed-angle
swivelling dresser
to dress forms
up to 908 on both
sides of the grinding
wheel

Rotary dressing
unit for dressing
hard grinding
wheels or for
high-volume
production

Grinding wheel

Precision
radius dresser
for single- and
twin-track
bearing
production

Formed diamond
roll dressing for
high-volume
production

Dressing tool

Silicon carbide
or diamond dressing
wheel for dressing
either diamond or
cBN grinding
wheels
Dressing tool

(a)
Diamond
dressing tool
Grinding
face

Grinding wheel

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering(b)


Materials, 5th ed.
Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

FIGURE 9.11 (a) Methods of grinding wheel


dressing. (b) Shaping the grinding face of a wheel
by dressing it with computer-controlled shaping
features. Note that the diamond dressing tool is
normal to the wheel surface at point of contact.
Source: OKUMA America Corporation.

Surface Grinding
Wheel

Wheel

Workpieces
Wheel
Work table

Workpiece

Workpiece

Horizontal-spindle surface
grinder: Traverse grinding

Rotary table

Horizontal-spindle surface
grinder: Plunge grinding

(a)

(b)

(c)

FIGURE 9.12 Schematic illustrations of surface-grinding operations. (a) Traverse grinding with a horizontal-spindle
surface grinder. (b) Plunge grinding with a horizontal-spindle surface grinder, producing a groove in the workpiece. (c)
Vertical-spindle rotary-table grinder (also known as the Blanchard-type grinder).
Wheel guard
Worktable
Workpiece

Wheel head
Column

Saddle
Feed
Bed

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

FIGURE 9.12
Schematic illustration of a
horizontal-spindle surface grinder.

Thread and Internal Grinding


Grinding wheel

FIGURE 9.14 Threads produced by (a)


traverse and (b) plunge grinding.
(a)

(b)

Workpiece

Workpiece

Workpiece
Wheel

Wheel
Wheel

(a) Traverse grinding

(b) Plunge grinding

(c) Profile grinding

FIGURE 9.15 Schematic illustrations of internal-grinding operations.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Centerless Grinding
Through-feed grinding

Plunge grinding
Grinding
wheel

Feed
Grinding
wheel

End
stop

Workpiece

Work-rest blade
Regulating
wheel

Regulating wheel
(a)

(b)

Internal centerless grinding


Pressure
roll

Regulating
wheel

FIGURE 9.16 (a-c) Schematic illustrations of


centerless-grinding operations. (d) A computernumerical-control centerless grinding machine.
Source: Cincinnati Milacron, Inc.

Grinder shaft
Workpiece
(revolves clockwise)
Support roll
(c)

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

(d)

Creep-Feed Grinding

d = 16 mm

Low work speed, v

(a)

(b)

(c)

FIGURE 9.17 (a) Schematic illustration of the creep-feed grinding process. Note the large wheel depth of
cut. (b) A groove produced on a flat surface in one pass by creep-feed grinding using a shaped wheel.
Groove depth can be on the order of a few mm. (c) An example of creep-feed grinding with a shaped
wheel. Source: Courtesy of Blohm, Inc. and Society of Manufacturing Engineers.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Finishing Operations
Abrasive grains
Size coat
Make coat
Backing

Spindle

FIGURE 9.18 Schematic illustration of the structure of a


coated abrasive. Sandpaper, developed in the 16th century,
and emery cloth are common examples of coated
abrasives.

Stone

FIGURE 9.19 Schematic illustration of a honing tool to


improve the surface finish of bored or ground holes.
Nonabrading
bronze guide

Oscillation
(traverse if
necessary)

Motor
Stone

Holder

Rotation

Stone
Workpiece

Workpiece
(a)

Rolls
(b)

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

FIGURE 9.20 Schematic illustration of the superfinishing


process for a cylindrical part: (a) cylindrical microhoning;
(b) centerless microhoning.

Lapping
Lap position and
pressure control
Upper lap
Lap

Abrasive

Workpiece

Workpiece

Before
Workholding
plate
After

Guide rail

(a)

Workpieces

Machine pan

(b)

FIGURE 9.21 (a) Schematic illustration of the lapping process. (b) Production
lapping on flat surfaces. (c) Production lapping on cylindrical surfaces.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

(c)

Lower lap

Chemical-Mechanical Polishing
Abrasive slurry

Workpiece

Workpiece carrier

Workpiece
carrier

Workpiece (disk)

Polishing pad

Polishing
table
Polishing table
(a) Side view

(a) Top view

FIGURE 9.22 Schematic illustration of the chemical-mechanical polishing process. This process is
widely used in the manufacture of silicon wafers and integrated circuits, where it is known as
chemical-mechanical planarization. Additional carriers and more disks per carrier also are possible.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Polishing Using Magnetic Fields

Drive shaft

S-pole

Workpiece

N-pole

Guide ring
Magnetic fluid
and abrasive
grains
Ceramic balls
(workpiece)
Float
NSNSNSNSNSNS
Magnetic fluid

Permanent magnets
(a)

(b)

FIGURE 9.23 Schematic illustration of the use of magnetic fields to polish balls and rollers: (a) magnetic
float polishing of ceramic balls and (b) magnetic-field-assisted polishing of rollers. Source: After R.
Komanduri, M. Doc, and M. Fox.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Ultrasonic Machining
Power
supply

Transducer

Glass-graphite
epoxy composite

Workpiece

1.2 mm
(0.048 in.)
50 mm (2 in.)
diameter

Abrasive
slurry

Tool

Glass

Slots 0.64 3 1.5 mm


(0.025 3 0.060 in.)

Holes 0.4 mm (0.016 in.)


diameter

(b)

(c)

(a)

FIGURE 9.24 (a) Schematic illustration of the ultrasonic-machining process; material is removed through
microchipping and erosion. (b) and (c) Typical examples of cavities produced by ultrasonic machining. Note
the dimensions of cut and the types of workpiece materials.

Contact time:
5r ! co "1/5
to !
co v
Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.
Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Contact force:
2mv
Fave =
to

Process

Characteristics

Chemical machining
(CM)

Shallow removal (up to 12 mm) on large flat or


curved surfaces; blanking of thin sheets; low tooling and equipment cost; suitable for low production runs.
Complex shapes with deep cavities; highest rate
of material removal; expensive tooling and equipment; high power consumption; medium to high
production quantity.
Cutting off and sharpening hard materials, such
as tungsten-carbide tools; also used as a honing
process; higher material removal rate than grinding.
Shaping and cutting complex parts made of hard
materials; some surface damage may result; also
used for grinding and cutting; versatile; expensive
tooling and equipment.
Contour cutting of flat or curved surfaces; expensive equipment.
Cutting and hole making on thin materials; heataffected zone; does not require a vacuum; expensive equipment; consumes much energy; extreme
caution required in use.
Cutting and hole making on thin materials; very
small holes and slots; heat-affected zone; requires
a vacuum; expensive equipment.
Cutting all types of nonmetallic materials to 25
mm (1 in.) and greater in thickness; suitable for
contour cutting of flexible materials; no thermal
damage; environmentally safe process.
Single or multilayer cutting of metallic and nonmetallic materials.
Cutting, slotting, deburring, flash removal, etching, and cleaning of metallic and nonmetallic materials; tends to round off sharp edges; some hazard because of airborne particulates.

Electrochemical
machining (ECM)
Electrochemical grinding
(ECG)
Electrical-discharge
machining (EDM)
Wire EDM
Laser-beam machining
(LBM)
Electron-beam
machining (EBM)
Water-jet machining
(WJM)
Abrasive water-jet
machining (AWJM)
Abrasive-jet machining
(AJM)

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Process Parameters and Typical


Material Removal Rate or Cutting Speed
0.025-0.1 mm/min

V: 5-25 dc; A: 2.5-12 mm/min,


depending on current density.
A: 1-3 A/mm2 ; typically 1500
mm3 /min per 1000 A.

Advanced
Machining
Processes

V: 50-380; A: 0.1-500; typically


300 mm3 /min.
Varies with workpiece material
and its thickness.
0.50-7.5 m/min.

1-2 mm3 /min


Varies considerably with workpiece material.
Up to 7.5 m/min.
Varies considerably with workpiece material.

TABLE 9.4
General
characteristics of advanced
machining processes.

Chemical Milling

4 mm
(before
machining)
2 mm
(after
machining)

Chemically
machined area

Section

(a)

(b)

FIGURE 9.25 (a) Missile skin-panel section contoured by chemical milling to improve the stiffness-toweight ratio of the part. (b) Weight reduction of space launch vehicles by chemical milling of aluminumalloy plates. These panels are chemically milled after the plates have first been formed into shape, such as
by roll forming or stretch forming. Source: ASM International.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Chemical Machining
Agitator
3rd
Tank

Maskant

Steps
2nd
1st

Edge of maskant
Material removed

Undercut

Workpiece
Heating

Chemical
reagent

Cooling
coils
(a)

Depth
Workpiece
(b)

FIGURE 9.26 (a) Schematic illustration of the chemical machining process. Note that no forces are involved in
this process. (b) Stages in producing a profiled cavity by chemical machining.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Roughness and Tolerance Capabilities


in.
2000 500
125
32
8
1000 250
63
16

2
4

0.5
1

100 50

MECHANICAL
Abrasive-flow machining
Low-stress grinding
Ultrasonic machining

0.001 in.
20 10 5
2 1

0.5 0.2 0.1 0.05

ELECTRICAL
Electrochemical deburring
Electrochemical grinding
Electrochemical milling (frontal)
Electrochemical milling (side wall)
Electrochemical polishing
Shaped tube electrolytic machining

(b)
(c)
(b) (d)
(a)
(b)

THERMAL
Electron-beam machining
Electrical-discharge grinding
Electrical-discharge machining (finishing)
Electrical-discharge machining (roughing)
Laser-beam machining
Plasma-beam machining
(a)
(a) (b)

CHEMICAL
Chemical machining
Photochemical machining
Electropolishing
CONVENTIONAL MACHINING
Turning
Surface grinding

25
50

6.3
1.60
0.4
0.1 0.025
12.5 3.12
0.8
0.2
0.05 0.012
Surface Roughness, Ra (m)

Note: (a) Depends on state of starting surface.


(b) Titanium alloys are generally rougher than nickel alloys.
(c) High current density areas.
(d) Low current density areas.

2500 1250 500 250 125 50 25 12.5


Tolerance, mm x 10-3

5 2.5 1.25

Average application (normally anticipated values)


Less frequent application (unusual or precision conditions)
Rare (special operating conditions)

FIGURE 9.27 Surface roughness and dimensional tolerance capabilities of various machining processes. Note the wide range within
each process. (See also Fig. 8.26.) Source: Machining Data Handbook, 3rd ed., 1980. Used by permission of Metcut Research
Associates, Inc.
Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.
Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Chemical Blanking

FIGURE 9.28 Typical parts made by chemical blanking; note the fine detail. Source:
Courtesy of Buckabee-Mears St. Paul.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Electrochemical Machining
75 mm

DC

power
supply
Insulating
coating

(-)

Pump for
circulating
electrolyte

Telescoping cover

140 mm

Ram

Insulating
layer
Feed

65 mm

Electrolyte
Forging
Machined
workpiece

Tool

Copper electrode

Electrode
carrier

(a)

(+)
Tank
14 holes

Workpiece

86 mm

Electrolyte
112 mm

(b)

FIGURE 9.29
Schematic illustration of the
electrochemical-machining process. This process is the
reverse of electroplating, described in Section 4.5.1.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

(c)

FIGURE 9.30 Typical parts made by electrochemical


machining. (a) Turbine blade made of a nickel alloy, 360
HB; the part on the right is the shaped electrode. Source:
ASM International. (b) Thin slots on a 4340-steel rollerbearing cage. (c) Integral airfoils on a compressor disk.

Electrochemical Grinding
Electrolyte from pump
Electrode (grinding wheel)
Spindle
Electrical connection
1
in (3.1 mm)
8

Insulating
abrasive
particles

0.020 in.
(0.5 mm)

DC

Insulating
bushing

Workpiece
Work
table

Inconel

(2)

power
supply

1
in. (0.4 mm)
64

(1)

(a)

(b)

FIGURE 9.31 (a) Schematic illustration of the electrochemical grinding process. (b) Thin slot produced on
a round nickel-alloy tube by this process.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Electrical Discharge Machining


Current
Rectifier control

Servo
control

Movable
electrode
Worn electrode

(+)

(-)

Power supply

Spark
Tank
Workpiece

Melted
workpiece

Dielectric fluid

FIGURE 9.32 Schematic illustration of the electrical-discharge-machining process.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

EDM Examples
1.5 mm dia.

Workpiece

8 holes,
0.17 mm

Electrode
(a)

(b)

(c)

FIGURE 9.33 (a) Examples of shapes produced by the electrical-discharge


machining process, using shaped electrodes. The two round parts in the
rear are a set of dies for extruding the aluminum piece shown in front; see
also Section 6.4. Source: Courtesy of AGIE USA Ltd. (b) A spiral cavity
produced using a shaped rotating electrode. Source: American Machinist. (c)
Holes in a fuel-injection nozzle produced by electrical-discharge machining.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

FIGURE 9.34
Stepped cavities
produced with a square electrode
by EDM. In this operation, the
workpiece moves in the two
principal horizontal directions, and
its motion is synchronized with the
downward movement of the
electrode to produce these cavities.
Also shown is a round electrode
capable of producing round or
elliptical cavities. Source: Courtesy of
AGIE USA Ltd.

Wire EDM
Wire
Dielectric
supply

Wire
diameter
Spark gap

Workpiece
Slot (kerf)
Wire
guides

Reel

FIGURE 9.35 Schematic illustration of the wire EDM process. As much as 50 hours of machining can be
performed with one reel of wire, which is then recycled.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Laser Machining
Flash lamp
Reflective end
Laser crystal

FIGURE 9.36 (a) Schematic illustration of the


laser-beam machining process. (b) Cutting sheet
metal with a laser beam. Source: (b) Courtesy of
Rofin-Sinat, Inc.

Partially
reflective end
Lens

Power
supply

Workpiece

(a)

(b)

TABLE 9.5 General applications of lasers in


manufacturing.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Application
Laser Type
Cutting
Metals
PCO2 ; CWCO2 ; Nd:YAG; ruby
Plastics
CWCO2
Ceramics
PCO2
Drilling
Metals
PCO2 ; Nd:YAG; Nd:glass; ruby
Plastics
Excimer
Marking
Metals
PCO2 ; Nd:YAG
Plastics
Excimer
Ceramics
Excimer
Surface treatment (metals) CWCO2
Welding (metals)
PCO2 ; CWCO2 ; Nd:YAG; Nd:glass; ruby
Note: P=pulsed; CW=continuous wave.

Electron-Beam Machining
High voltage cable (30 kV, DC)

Cathode grid
Anode
Optical
viewing
system

Valve

Electron stream
Magnetic lens
Deflection coils

Viewing
port
Vacuum chamber

Workpiece
Work table

High
vacuum
pump

FIGURE 9.37 Schematic illustration of the electron-beam machining process. Unlike LBM, this
process requires a vacuum, and hence workpiece size is limited by the chamber size.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Water-Jet Machining
Accumulator

Controls
Valve

Fluid supply
Mixer and filter
Sapphire nozzle

Pump

Hydraulic
unit

Intensifier

Jet
Workpiece
Drain

(a)

Control panel

x-axis
control

y-axis
control

FIGURE 9.38
(a) Schematic
illustration of water-jet machining. (b)
A computer-controlled water-jet
cutting machine. (c) Examples of
various nonmetallic parts machined
by the water-jet cutting process.
Source: Courtesy of OMAX
Corporation.

Abrasive-jet
head
Collection
tank

(b)

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

(c)

Abrasive-Jet Machining
Filters

Powder
supply
and mixer
Exhaust
Hood

Pressure
regulator

Gas
supply

Hand
holder

Nozzle
Workpiece

Vibrator

Foot control
valve
(a)

(b)

FIGURE 9.39 (a) Schematic illustration of the abrasive-jet machining process. (b) Examples of parts
produced by abrasive-jet machining; the parts are 50 mm (2 in.) thick and are made of 304 stainless
steel. Source: Courtesy of OMAX Corporation.

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Design Considerations
Poor
Sharp corner

Good
Breakaway
chipping

Radius 0.25 mm
(0.010 in)
or greater

Undercut 3 mm
(1/8 in) wide
or greater

Backup plate
Coolant hole

Best

Through
hole
(a)

(b)

FIGURE 9.40 Design guidelines for internal features, especially as applied to holes. (a) Guidelines for grinding the
internal surfaces of holes. These guidelines generally hold for honing as well. (b) The use of a backing plate for
producing high-quality through-holes by ultrasonic machining. Source: After J. Bralla.
Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.
Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Economic Considerations
m
10

0.4

300

200

63

32

16
Hone

Rough turn

Semifinish
turn

As-cast,
sawed, etc.

Surface
0
finish, Ra (in.) 2000 1000 500 250 125

Grind

100

Finish turn

Machining cost (%)

0.50
400

FIGURE 9.41 Increase in the cost of machining and finishing operations as a function of the surface finish required.
Note the rapid increase associated with finishing operations.
Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.
Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

Case Study: Stent Manufacture


Proximal and distal markers
indicate position of stent on radiograph

38 m
8 mm

Guide wire
0.356 mm
(0.014 in.) max

m (0.315 1.50 in.)

2.5 mm4.0 mm
(0.0100.16 in.)
Catheter and balloon
used for stent expansion

Variable Thickness Strut (VTSTM)


3-3-3 Pattern
a

FIGURE 9.42 The Guidant MULTI-LINK TETRATM


coronary stent system.

Notes:
a. 0.12 mm (0.0049 in.)
section thickness to provide
radiopacity
b. 0.091 mm (0.0036 in.)
thickness for flexibility

FIGURE 9.43 Detail of


the 3-3-3 MULTI-LINK
TETRATM pattern.
(a)

Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed.


Kalpakjian Schmid
2008, Pearson Education
ISBN No. 0-13-227271-7

(b)

(c)

FIGURE 9.44 Evolution of the stent surface. (a)


MULTI-LINK TETRATM after lasing. Note that a metal
slug is still attached. (b) After removal of slug. (c) After
electropolishing.

You might also like