Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Kevin Jerard Conard, 11th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    20 views2 pages
    This document is a court filing summarizing a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. It indicates that Kevin Jerard Conard was convicted of a crime and his appointed attorney, Robert Alan Glickman, filed a motion to withdraw representation and an Anders brief, arguing there were no non-frivolous grounds for appeal. After reviewing the record, the court's panel of judges granted the motion to withdraw and affirmed both Conard's conviction and sentence, finding no issues of merit to argue on appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-06-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-14908

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court filing summarizing a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. It indicates that Kevin Jerard Conard was convicted of a crime and his appointed attorney, Robert Alan Glickman, filed a motion to withdraw representation and an Anders brief, arguing there were no non-frivolous grounds for appeal. After reviewing the record, the court's panel of judges granted the motion to withdraw and affirmed both Conard's conviction and sentence, finding no issues of merit to argue on appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    20 views2 pages

    United States v. Kevin Jerard Conard, 11th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court filing summarizing a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. It indicates that Kevin Jerard Conard was convicted of a crime and his appointed attorney, Robert Alan Glickman, filed a motion to withdraw representation and an Anders brief, arguing there were no non-frivolous grounds for appeal. After reviewing the record, the court's panel of judges granted the motion to withdraw and affirmed both Conard's conviction and sentence, finding no issues of merit to argue on appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Case: 12-14908

    Date Filed: 06/21/2013

    Page: 1 of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]


    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 12-14908
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00099-RWS-ECS-1

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    KEVIN JERARD CONARD,
    a.k.a. Jabril Battle,
    a.k.a. Kevin G Conrad,
    a.k.a. Neal Joppson,
    a.k.a. Gebrael Den Atun El,
    a.k.a. G.D. Atun,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Georgia
    ________________________
    (June 21, 2013)

    Case: 12-14908

    Date Filed: 06/21/2013

    Page: 2 of 2

    Before CARNES, BARKETT and BLACK, Circuit Judges.


    PER CURIAM:
    Robert Alan Glickman, appointed counsel for Kevin Jerard Conard, in this
    direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
    appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
    1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
    that counsels assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
    independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
    counsels motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Conards conviction and
    sentence are AFFIRMED.

    You might also like