Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Donald Duhart, 11th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Donald Duhart's appointed counsel Robin Cindy Rosen-Evans to withdraw from representing Duhart in his direct criminal appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the court agreed with counsel's assessment that there were no issues of merit to raise on appeal. As a result, the court affirmed Duhart's convictions and sentences.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-05-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-13044

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Donald Duhart's appointed counsel Robin Cindy Rosen-Evans to withdraw from representing Duhart in his direct criminal appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the court agreed with counsel's assessment that there were no issues of merit to raise on appeal. As a result, the court affirmed Duhart's convictions and sentences.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Donald Duhart, 11th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted the motion of Donald Duhart's appointed counsel Robin Cindy Rosen-Evans to withdraw from representing Duhart in his direct criminal appeal. After independently reviewing the record, the court agreed with counsel's assessment that there were no issues of merit to raise on appeal. As a result, the court affirmed Duhart's convictions and sentences.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    [DO NOT PUBLISH]

    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 09-13044
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________

    FILED
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    MAY 12, 2010
    JOHN LEY
    CLERK

    D. C. Docket No. 08-60309-CR-KAM


    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    DONALD DUHART,
    Defendant-Appellant.

    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Florida
    _________________________
    (May 12, 2010)
    Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Robin Cindy Rosen-Evans, appointed counsel for Donald Duhart in this


    direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
    appellant, because, in her opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a
    brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d
    493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsels
    assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
    examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels
    motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Duharts convictions and sentences are
    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like