You are on page 1of 3

I would have to agree with Sir Paul. Weak in terms na basic siya.

Go
something beyond preparedness sana. Kasi if preparedness lang, kaya mo
tong tapusin in a week. And sayang ang stat subject mo kung hindi mo rin
ia-apply tapos weighted average lang ang iu-utilize mo. Try to read journals.
Wag mong madaliin. Usually, it takes more than one year to complete a
Masters thesis kaya dont be in a rush. Make it journal-worthy. At least
pwede mo na rin siyang i-try ipublish sa mga online journals. Magandang
bragging rights yung may published study ka. If ever, try to deal with the
existing issues ng OsMak sana like yung sa spread of infection sa DR, or
spread of infection in general since walang masyadong matinong protocol pa
ang OsMak regarding infectious control. Or go outside of OsMak. Go for a
community-based na research. HIV ang isa sa pinaka-mainstream research
topic ngayon. or DM. Tapos ang main outcome ng research mo is intervention
or policy. And you can ask for funding naman. You can apply sa DOST. They
are giving at least 40k as financial support. Increase the level of difficulty.
Yung title medyo need i-revise. Suggestion lang, what if instead of
Preparedness of Staff Nurses of Ospital ng Makati with regards Transfer to
Operating Room eh you change it to Preparedness of Staff Nurses of
Ospital ng Makati regarding Transfer to Operating Room?
Also, if preparedness, mas maganda kung mag-mixed methods ka (quantiquali). Do a KII sa mga nurses na recently natransfer and dun sa mga
itatransfer pa lang. Para ma-capture mo din yung live experience nila, preand post- transfer.
What is your basis of doing this research? May mga case ba na yung
tinransfer yung nurse eh hindi nakapag-function ng maayos at na-hinder ang
OR operations? You need to make the background localized meaning you
describe the OR situation of OsMak in relation to your research problem. That
should be presented in the Background of the Study. You can actually remove
lahat ng nilagay mo dun kasi hindi siya directly related dun sa research mo.
You need not to describe kung ano ang OR, yung Benners Stages of Clinical
Competence (hindi siya Novice to Expert Theory although yun yung
description ng theory niya), etc.
Balikan ko yung statement of the problem.
Yung hypothesis mo, you need to change it. Huhuhu. Gago yang si Randy,
hindi ganyan gumawa ng hypothesis. Hindi ka kaagad nag-a-assign ng level
of significance. Hindi yan standard na .05. Pwede yang .01 or .10 or any
number. Pero usually yang 3 ang ginagamit. Try mong tumingin sa nursing
research textbooks. Sa hypothesis testing ginagamit yung at 0.5 level of
significant...
Balikan ko din yung scope and limitations of the study.
Yung ROL mo, simplify. Make it as brief and concise as possible. Wag
masyadong verbose. Saka for research, 5 years lang ang dapat na kinukuha
mo. I mean, lahat ng reference mo dapat within the last 5 years lang (so no
more reference lower than 2011). Unless wala talagang material na relatively
new. Insert International and Philippine setting. Was there a study regarding
this? If yes, lagay mo. If wala, state mo sa ROL mo. Again, yung sa citation,

standardized dapat. Isang format lang. APA, MLA, or whatever suits you.
Make every reference and statement mo sa ROL relative sa research topic
mo. Wag mo ng masyadong i-describe in detail yung bawat phase sa periop.
Single statement is okay.
Make the ROL systematic if ever. Ano yung inclusion at exclusion criteria mo?
Ilang articles ang nahanap mo and how did you came up with the reference
na meron ka?
Discard the synthesis part. Anong isi-synthesize mo if hindi pa tapos ang
research mo? Synthesis is like summary yan. Dyan na papasok how your
research was able to discuss arguments na ni-reject mo in contrast dun sa
findings mo.
Yung conceptual paradigm mo, sana may discussion ka na pwede mong iaugment sa kahit anong grand theory. Tapos nag-state ka na sa input,
magiging necessary siya for SWOT analysis. Mag-so-SWOT analysis ka ba?
Kasi kung mag-so-SWOT ka, pwede mo na siyang isama dito. Pero saan? Ang
SWOT hindi siya lumalabas sa result kasi preliminary assessment yan. Saka
bakit hindi TOWS matrix instead? Saka necessary bang mag SWOT or TOWS
matrix/analysis ka? For what purpose? May gravity ba ang assessment mo
using that matrix sa pwedeng maging findings mo?
Yung research design mo, again, iklian mo lang. It doesnt need too much
explanation kung ano ang description. One liner is even enough.
Yung research locale din, simplify. You dont even need to mention na OsMak
slowly evolved into the state of the art masyado ng descriptive yan.
Sa sample and sampling technique, bakit stratified random sampling tapos
10 nurses each ward for a total of 100 respondents? Ang stratified ay
ginagamit to ensure na may proportion among the number of respondents
para makapag-generalize ka. Ang SRS ay isang probability sampling so
expected na may equal chances lahat ng nasa population mo. Kung mamimili
ka lang ng 10, hindi siya pasok dun. Seems like convenience ang ginagawa
mo. Saka how did you compute for your population size ng 100? At what
level of significance? May website ka bang ginamit for the calculation? If yes,
state.
Sa instrumentation, sure ka bang self-made questionnaire ang in-employ
mo? As far as I can see, adapted siya. Self-made is purely ikaw ang
nagdesign. Kahit yung minention mong research from Benguet State Univ ay
adapted din ang ginamit nilang questionnaire.
Sa instrumentation part, mas i-clarify mo yung paggamit mo ng Cronbachs
Alpha relative sa kung paano mo siya iuutilize sa research mo. Mas brief and
concise, mas okay. Saka check mo yung citation mo kasi hindi siya consistent
with the others.
Saka bakit likert scale tapos process ang nasa questionnaire mo sa part II?
Saka anong equivalent ng 1 hanggaang 5? You need to discuss that. Iwasan
mo hanggat maari na maging neutral ang sagot. Imbes na 5-point likert,
gawin mong 6 or 8 point.
Anong statistical software ang gagamitin mo? Kahit weighted average lang,
you need to state kung excel lang ba or SPSS ang gagamitin mo. Just be

cautious na for research purposes, bawal ang hindi licensed. Ang free lang na
software is Epi Info. Pero Stata, SPSS, NVIVO (for quali) kailangang licensed
sila at ini-state talaga yun.
Nasaan yung Informed Consent?
Pagsamasamahin mo na yung bibliography mo. Di naman importante na
maidentify kung yan ba ay journal or electronic database. Ang importante, eh
standardized sila like APA or MLA reference.

You might also like