Coleman, an acrobat, was engaged by Hotel de France to entertain guests but the contract was later cancelled. Hotel de France argued the contract was void as ultra vires. The court ruled the contract was valid, finding that entertaining guests was within Hotel de France's incidental powers and that the ultra vires doctrine cannot be used to cause injustice or legal wrong. The employment of artists like Coleman could fairly be considered an incidental power for hotels and was intended to entertain guests, so the contract was upheld.
Coleman, an acrobat, was engaged by Hotel de France to entertain guests but the contract was later cancelled. Hotel de France argued the contract was void as ultra vires. The court ruled the contract was valid, finding that entertaining guests was within Hotel de France's incidental powers and that the ultra vires doctrine cannot be used to cause injustice or legal wrong. The employment of artists like Coleman could fairly be considered an incidental power for hotels and was intended to entertain guests, so the contract was upheld.
Coleman, an acrobat, was engaged by Hotel de France to entertain guests but the contract was later cancelled. Hotel de France argued the contract was void as ultra vires. The court ruled the contract was valid, finding that entertaining guests was within Hotel de France's incidental powers and that the ultra vires doctrine cannot be used to cause injustice or legal wrong. The employment of artists like Coleman could fairly be considered an incidental power for hotels and was intended to entertain guests, so the contract was upheld.
Doctrine: A corporation cannot invoke ultra vires an act to claim that a contract it entered into is void for its benefit, especially when such contract appears to be valid and is based on powers incidental to the corporations express powers. Facts: Geraldine Coleman, an acrobat and gymnast, was engaged by Hotel de France to entertain its patrons in its hotel in Manila. Hotel de France agreed to pay her a monthly salary, furnish her board, lodging, and laundry expenses and to pay for her passage from Australia to Manila and return. The contract was then cancelled by Hotel de France which prompted Coleman to file an action for damages for breach of contract. As a defense, Hotel de France argued that the contract was, nonetheless, void because it exceeded their corporate capacity. Issue: Whether or not the contract between Coleman and Hotel de France was void because it is ultra vires? Held: NO. The contract is valid. Hotel de Frances contention that the articles of incorporation, which provides for a primary purpose of operation of hotels and weekend resorts, makes the contract void for being ultra vires is incorrect. The Court ruled that the employment of vaudeville artists, bands, orchestras, and the like may fairly be held to be included within the powers incidental to the express powers for which the defendant corporation engaged. Colemans employment clearly was for the purpose of entertaining Hotel de Frances guests, which is an activity considered part of Hotel de Frances incidental powers. Further, the court reminds the defendant that, The doctrine of ultra vires, when invoked for or against a corporation, should not be allowed to prevail where it would defeat the ends of justice or work a legal wrong.