Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Wilburn Dobbs v. A.G. Thomas, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, 74 F.3d 239, 11th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit from January 19, 1996 regarding Wilburn Dobbs appealing his case. The court remanded the case back to the district court to conduct new hearings on all issues regarding ineffective assistance of counsel during the sentencing phase. The district court is directed to make written findings of fact and conclusions of law following the hearings.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-01-19 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 74 F.3d 239 Docket: 95-8244

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit from January 19, 1996 regarding Wilburn Dobbs appealing his case. The court remanded the case back to the district court to conduct new hearings on all issues regarding ineffective assistance of counsel during the sentencing phase. The district court is directed to make written findings of fact and conclusions of law following the hearings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    Wilburn Dobbs v. A.G. Thomas, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, 74 F.3d 239, 11th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit from January 19, 1996 regarding Wilburn Dobbs appealing his case. The court remanded the case back to the district court to conduct new hearings on all issues regarding ineffective assistance of counsel during the sentencing phase. The district court is directed to make written findings of fact and conclusions of law following the hearings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    74 F.

    3d 239

    Wilburn DOBBS,
    v.
    A.G. THOMAS, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and
    Classification Center.
    No. 95-8244.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Eleventh Circuit.
    Jan. 19, 1996.

    Michael Kennedy McIntyre, Elizabeth Vila Rogan, Atlanta, GA, for


    appellant.
    Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, State Law Department, Mary Beth
    Westmoreland, Asst. Atty. General, Atlanta, GA, for appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of
    Georgia (No. 4:80-CV-247), Harold L. Murphy, Judge.
    Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, HATCHETT and BIRCH, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    This case is remanded to the district court, and the district court is directed to
    conduct de novo hearings on all issues regarding ineffective assistance of
    counsel in the sentencing phase of this case. Following hearings, the district
    court shall make written findings of fact and conclusions of law.

    REMANDED.

    You might also like