Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. John Oscar Haverlick, 311 F.2d 229, 2d Cir. (1963)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    John Oscar Haverlick appeals his conviction for converting union funds for his own use in violation of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959. He claims the statutory provision is unconstitutional as it legislates on matters reserved to the states. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in a per curiam decision affirms Haverlick's conviction in open court, finding the statutory provision constitutional.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1963-01-10 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 311 F.2d 229 Docket: 27388_1

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    John Oscar Haverlick appeals his conviction for converting union funds for his own use in violation of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959. He claims the statutory provision is unconstitutional as it legislates on matters reserved to the states. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in a per curiam decision affirms Haverlick's conviction in open court, finding the statutory provision constitutional.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    United States v. John Oscar Haverlick, 311 F.2d 229, 2d Cir. (1963)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    John Oscar Haverlick appeals his conviction for converting union funds for his own use in violation of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959. He claims the statutory provision is unconstitutional as it legislates on matters reserved to the states. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in a per curiam decision affirms Haverlick's conviction in open court, finding the statutory provision constitutional.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    311 F.

    2d 229

    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,


    v.
    John Oscar HAVERLICK, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 184.
    Docket 27388.

    United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.


    January 10, 1963.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of
    New York; Stephen W. Brennan, Chief Judge.
    John Oscar Haverlick appeals from his conviction on his plea of guilt of
    having converted union funds to his own use in violation of LaborManagement Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959, 29 U.S.C. 501(c),
    claiming that the statutory provision is unconstitutional as legislation upon
    matters reserved to the states. D.C.N.D.N.Y., 195 F.Supp. 331.
    Charles R. Rinaldo, Syracuse, N. Y., for defendant-appellant.
    James W. Dolan, Asst. U. S. Atty., N. D.N.Y., Albany, N. Y. (Justin J.
    Mahoney, U. S. Atty., Albany, N. Y., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.
    Before CLARK, KAUFMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM.

    The conviction is affirmed in open court.

    You might also like