This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of a complaint filed by Continental Cameras Co. and Metropolitan Bank against Continental's insurance broker for lack of admiralty jurisdiction. The district court, led by Judge Leonard B. Sand, had found no admiralty jurisdiction over claims that the broker failed to forward insurance premiums on time, resulting in cancellation of Continental's policy, and also failed to notify Continental of the cancellation. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision for the same reasons outlined in Judge Sand's published opinion.
This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of a complaint filed by Continental Cameras Co. and Metropolitan Bank against Continental's insurance broker for lack of admiralty jurisdiction. The district court, led by Judge Leonard B. Sand, had found no admiralty jurisdiction over claims that the broker failed to forward insurance premiums on time, resulting in cancellation of Continental's policy, and also failed to notify Continental of the cancellation. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision for the same reasons outlined in Judge Sand's published opinion.
This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of a complaint filed by Continental Cameras Co. and Metropolitan Bank against Continental's insurance broker for lack of admiralty jurisdiction. The district court, led by Judge Leonard B. Sand, had found no admiralty jurisdiction over claims that the broker failed to forward insurance premiums on time, resulting in cancellation of Continental's policy, and also failed to notify Continental of the cancellation. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision for the same reasons outlined in Judge Sand's published opinion.
CONTINENTAL CAMERAS CO., INC., Metropolitan Bank &
Trust Co., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FOA & SON CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 213, Docket No. 87-7466.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit. Argued Oct. 13, 1987. Decided Oct. 19, 1987.
Peter D. Isakoff, Washington, D.C. (Richard Ben-Veniste, Ben-Veniste &
Shernoff, Washington, D.C., Thomas J. Fitzpatrick, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants. David Franks, Uniondale, N.Y. (Frank L. Amoroso, Rivkin, Radler, Dunne & Bayh, Uniondale, N.Y., on the brief), for defendant-appellee. Before KEARSE, PIERCE and PRATT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Plaintiffs Continental Cameras Co., Inc. ("Continental"), and Metropolitan
Bank & Trust Co. appeal from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Leonard B. Sand, Judge, dismissing for lack of admiralty jurisdiction their complaint against Continental's insurance broker for failing to forward premiums to Continental's insurance company in time to avoid cancellation of Continental's policy and failing to inform Continental that its policy had been canceled. We affirm the judgment dismissing the complaint substantially for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Sand, published at 658 F.Supp. 287 (1987). See generally Peralta Shipping Corp. v. Smith & Johnson Corp., 739 F.2d 798 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1031, 105 S.Ct. 1405, 84 L.Ed.2d 791 (1985).
Russell J. Rotko and Florence Rotko v. General Creighton B. Abrams, Individually and As Commanding General, U. S. Armed Forces in Vietnam, 455 F.2d 992, 2d Cir. (1972)
United States of America For The Use of F. E. Robinson Co., of N.C., Inc. and F. E. Robinson Co. of N.C., Inc. v. Alpha-Continental, A Joint Venture, Etc., 404 F.2d 343, 4th Cir. (1968)
United States To The Use of Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Company v. Markowitz Brothers, Inc. and Continental Casualty Company, 389 F.2d 387, 4th Cir. (1968)
Priscilla Alden Beach v. Oneida National Bank and Trust Company of Central New York (Successor To Rome Trust Company) and Johnson D. McMahon, 305 F.2d 826, 2d Cir. (1962)
The Bank of Canton, Ltd. v. Republic National Bank of New York, Defendant-Third Party v. Sharp International Corp., Third Party, 636 F.2d 30, 2d Cir. (1980)
India Supply Mission and The President of India v. Panoceanic Tankers Corporation, As Owner of The S. S. Panoceanic Faith, 392 F.2d 979, 2d Cir. (1968)
National Labor Relations Board v. Local 282, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, 438 F.2d 100, 2d Cir. (1970)
Victoria de Pasquale, and v. First Western Savings & Loan Association, A Nevada Corporation, and First Title Insurance Company, A Nevada Corporation, 423 F.2d 1202, 1st Cir. (1970)
Tubular Textile MacHinery Corporation, and Joseph Cohn and Eugene Cohn, Intervenors-Appellants v. Frank R. Redman and Redman Process American Corporation, 267 F.2d 784, 2d Cir. (1959)
Ernest A. Schmidt and Robert A. Schmidt, a Minor, by His Next Friend, Ernest A. Schmidt v. Bedy Lizza and Ernest Deblasio, Doing Business as Keystone Fireworks& Specialty Company, 185 F.2d 675, 3rd Cir. (1950)