The court affirmed the denial of a discharge of bankruptcy for August R. Gerecke based on the finding that he made a knowingly false statement in a credit application that was relied upon by a creditor. The referee and district court both found that Gerecke failed to meet his burden of proof under the Bankruptcy Act to show the statement was not false. The appeals court agreed with this conclusion.
The court affirmed the denial of a discharge of bankruptcy for August R. Gerecke based on the finding that he made a knowingly false statement in a credit application that was relied upon by a creditor. The referee and district court both found that Gerecke failed to meet his burden of proof under the Bankruptcy Act to show the statement was not false. The appeals court agreed with this conclusion.
The court affirmed the denial of a discharge of bankruptcy for August R. Gerecke based on the finding that he made a knowingly false statement in a credit application that was relied upon by a creditor. The referee and district court both found that Gerecke failed to meet his burden of proof under the Bankruptcy Act to show the statement was not false. The appeals court agreed with this conclusion.
Jerome D. Schwitzer, Asst. U.S. Atty., Newark, sN.J. (Chester A. Weidenburner, U.S. Atty., George J. Rossi, Asst. U.S. Atty., Newark, N.J., on the brief), for appellee. Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.
August R. Gerecke, Bankrupt, appeals from a denial of a discharge by the
district judge. The denial was based upon a finding that the bankrupt had made a knowingly false statement in a credit application which was relied upon in part by a creditor. The referee found that the bankrupt failed to sustain the burden of proof imposed upon him by the Bankruptcy Act, 14, sub. c(3), 11 U.S.C.A. 32, sub. c(3). The district court affirmed the referee. We not only do not find the conclusion clearly erroneous, but we agree with it.
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
James Riddick v. Robert Edmiston, Superintendent of Southern State Correctional, and The Attorney General of The State of New Jersey, 894 F.2d 586, 3rd Cir. (1990)
United States of America Ex Rel. James Whiting v. Alfred T. Rundle, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Graterford, Pennsylvania, 389 F.2d 47, 3rd Cir. (1968)