Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Howard JAMISON, Administrator of The Estate of Leonard Palumbo, Deceased, v. City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, A Municipal Corporation, Appellant

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views1 page
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in a case where the administrator of an estate sued the City of Pittsburgh. The court found the appeal brought by the City of Pittsburgh to be without merit after examining the record, briefs, and oral arguments. The judgment in favor of the estate administrator was affirmed.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1963-07-31 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 319 F.2d 530 Docket: 14343

    Original Title

    Howard Jamison, Administrator of the Estate of Leonard Palumbo, Deceased v. City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, a Municipal Corporation, 319 F.2d 530, 3rd Cir. (1963)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in a case where the administrator of an estate sued the City of Pittsburgh. The court found the appeal brought by the City of Pittsburgh to be without merit after examining the record, briefs, and oral arguments. The judgment in favor of the estate administrator was affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views1 page

    Howard JAMISON, Administrator of The Estate of Leonard Palumbo, Deceased, v. City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, A Municipal Corporation, Appellant

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in a case where the administrator of an estate sued the City of Pittsburgh. The court found the appeal brought by the City of Pittsburgh to be without merit after examining the record, briefs, and oral arguments. The judgment in favor of the estate administrator was affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    319 F.

    2d 530

    Howard JAMISON, Administrator of the Estate of Leonard


    Palumbo, deceased,
    v.
    CITY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, a municipal
    corporation, Appellant.
    No. 14343.

    United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.


    Argued June 18, 1963.
    Decided July 31, 1963.

    Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of
    Pennsylvania; Herbert P. Sorg, Judge.
    Robert Engle, Asst. City Solicitor, Pittsburgh, Pa. (David W. Craig, City
    Solicitor, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
    James E. McLaughlin, Pittsburgh, Pa. (William C. O'Toole, McArdle,
    Harrington & McLaughlin, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
    Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and STALEY and FORMAN, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM.

    An examination of the record and a consideration of the briefs and the oral
    arguments of the parties convinces us that the appeal is without merit and that
    the case has been decided correctly. Accordingly, the judgment will be
    affirmed.

    You might also like