Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history:
Received 25 November 2014
Accepted 22 July 2015
Available online 12 August 2015
Objective: Several studies suggested the possible relationship between decreased bone mineral density
(BMD) of the temporal bone and hearing loss, primarily of the sensorineural type. The aim of the present
study is to determine the relationship between BMD and hearing loss and to evaluate the systemic Ca2+
and vitamin D status with relation to hearing sensitivity in the postmenopausal women who were
diagnosed with primary osteoporosis.
Methods: The study involved a total of 324 patients who were referred between 2008 and 2013. Based
on BMD scores, the subjects were divided into three groups: normal BMD (n = 102), osteopenia (n = 106)
and osteoporosis (n = 116). Hearing sensitivity was evaluated with audiometric tests along with serum
Ca2+ and vitamin D level.
Results: The age distribution among 3 groups was similar. Mean serum Ca2+, phosphate, 25(OH)D and
creatinine clearance were within the standard laboratory reference ranges in all patients. There was no
difference in the proportion of vitamin D deciency among groups. The typical type of hearing loss was
sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and the patients with reduced BMD showed higher prevalence of
SNHL than the patients with normal BMD. Pure-tone thresholds average was signicantly higher in all
frequencies in women with osteopenia/osteoporosis than women with normal BMD. Multiple logistic
regression analyses showed that age and lumbar BMD were associated with the presence of hearing loss
(>25 dB).
Conclusion: Our ndings suggest that the presence of decreased BMD in postmenopausal women might
be associated with the higher prevalence of age-related SNHL.
2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Hearing loss
Postmenopause
Osteoporosis
Vitamin D
Calcium
Bone mineral density
1. Introduction
Age-related hearing loss, also known as presbycusis, is one of
the most prevalent chronic conditions affecting older population.
Hearing loss is usually bilateral, symmetrical and slowly progressive sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), starting in high frequencies. As life expectancy has increased, an increasing number of
individuals would be forced to endure hearing impairment in their
senior years. Hearing loss in old ages has a signicant impact on
everyday living and can lead to the communication difculties,
social withdrawal and depression. In addition, unrecognized and
untreated hearing loss is also common in geriatric population until
speech communication is impaired [1].
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2015.07.005
0385-8146/ 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana August 02, 2016.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2016. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
156
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana August 02, 2016.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2016. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
157
3. Results
3.1. Clinical characteristics of patients
First, the type and degree of hearing loss in both ears of the
patients were investigated as shown in Table 3. SNHL was found in a
total of 131 ears (56.5%, n = 232 ears) of osteoporotic patients, 101
ears (47.6%, n = 212 ears) of osteopenic patients and 61 ears (29.9%,
n = 204 ears) of the patients with normal BMD. The prevalence rate
of SNHL in the patients with osteoporosis/osteopenia was signicantly higher than the patients with normal BMD. However, there
was no signicant difference between the patients with osteopenia
and those with osteoporosis in the prevalence of SNHL. Conductive
hearing loss (CHL) or mixed hearing loss was found in relatively
small number of patients without the statistical signicance among
3 groups. The degrees of SNHL were classied as mild to moderate in
the majority of the patients regardless of BMD scores (Table 4).
There was no signicant difference among groups for the degree of
hearing impairment.
The mean air-conduction hearing thresholds at different
frequencies in better ear and poorer ear are shown in Fig. 1 The
air-conduction pure-tone thresholds in all frequencies (250
8000 Hz) were measured signicantly higher in the patients with
osteoporosis/osteopenia than the patients with normal BMD. The
mean bone-conduction hearing thresholds at different frequencies
in better ear and poorer ear are presented in Table 5. The boneconduction pure-tone thresholds in 5004000 Hz were signicantly increased in the patients with osteoporosis/osteopenia than
the patients with normal BMD. High-frequency thresholds tended
to be signicantly higher than low frequency thresholds in all ears
regardless of BMD scores (P < 0.05). For instance, high-frequency
PTA (48 kHz) for poorer ear was 34.1 22.7 for group 1,
49.4 23.1 for group 2, and 55.3 23.7 for group 3, respectively.
Low-frequency PTA (0.251 kHz) was 21.9 14.3 for group 1,
33.9 20.4 for group 2, and 37.1 20.6 for group 3, respectively.
Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the
association of the presence of hearing loss (PTA > 25 dB) and
Table 1
Demographic data of the patients (N = 324).
Age (years)
BMI (kg/m2)
Lumbar BMD (g/cm2)
T-score
Femur neck BMD (g/cm2)
T-score
Years since menopause (y)
Smoking (%)
Alcohol (%)
Hyperlipidemia (%)
Diabetes (%)
Hypertension (%)
Osteopenia (N = 106)
Osteoporosis (N = 116)
60.4 10.0
23.5 3.7
0.979 0.139
0.2 0.7
0.783 0.082
0.4 1.1
10.0 9.2
5 (4.9)
8 (7.8)
19 (18.6)
20 (19.6)
35 (34.3)
60.7 9.0
23.7 3.9
0.835 0.084
1.7 0.6
0.680 0.103
1.4 0.8
11.9 8.4
4 (3.8)
10 (9.4)
20 (18.9)
24 (22.6)
38 (35.8)
62.3 9.0
23.6 3.7
0.663 0.103
3.2 0.8
0.534 0.137
2.5 0.9
12.5 8.4
5 (4.3)
11 (9.5)
22 (19.0)
26 (22.4)
42 (36.2)
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Data are presented as mean SD. Signicant differences are marked, NS, not signicant. BMI, Body mass index; BMD, Bone mineral density.
Table 2
Biochemical parameters (N = 324).
Mean score SD
Calcium (mg/dL)
Phosphate (mg/dL)
ALP (IU/L)
Creatinine clearance (mL/min)
25-(OH) vitamin D (ng/mL)
iPTH
Normal
Osteopenia
Osteoporosis
9.1 0.6
3.7 0.6
176.5 39.3
80.3 9.2
32.2 16.0
34.6 7.9
9.2 0.5
3.7 0.5
169.6 37.9
79.0 8.1
31.4 23.4
35.9 7.4
9.0 0.6
3.6 0.7
187.5 86.2
78.1 8.3
30.5 18.7
32.6 7.1
Data are presented as mean score SD. Signicant differences are marked, NS, not signicant. ALP, total alkaline phosphatase; iPTH, intact parathyroid hormone.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana August 02, 2016.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2016. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
158
Table 3
Type of hearing loss presented by the patients (N = 324).
Osteopenia
Normal
Osteoporosis
Right (%)
Left (%)
Right (%)
Left (%)
Right (%)
Left (%)
72(70.6)
30(29.4)
0(0)
0(0)
71(69.6)
31(30.4)
0(0)
0(0)
52(49.0)**
50(47.2)*
1(0.9)
3(2.9)
54(50.9)**
51(48.2)*
0(0)
1(0.9)
46(39.7)**
68(58.6)**
0(0)
2(1.7)
48(41.4)**
63(54.3)**
1(0.9)
4(3.4)
Signicant differences are marked, *P < .05; **P < .01, for the comparison with normal group. HL, hearing loss.
Table 4
Degree of sensorineural hearing loss presented by the patients.
Normal
Osteopenia
Osteoporosis
Right (%)
Left (%)
Right (%)
Left (%)
Right (%)
Left (%)
17(56.7)
7(23.3)
3(10.0)
2(6.7)
1(3.3)
11(35.5)
12(38.7)
5(16.1)
2(6.5)
1(3.2)
22(44.0)
20(40.0)
4(8.0)
2(4.0)
2(4.0)
30(58.8)
13(25.5)
4(7.9)
2(3.9)
2(3.9)
17(25.0)
39(57.4)
9(13.2)
2(2.9)
1(1.5)
18(28.6)
28(44.4)
10(15.9)
5(7.9)
2(3.2)
Total
30
31
50
51
68
63
125250500 1k 2k 3k 4k 8k
0
10
10
20
30
40
*
**
*
**
**
**
**
**
*
**
50
80
**
**
**
60
70
**
Normal, N=102
Osteopenia, N=106
Osteoporosis, N=116
Better ear
125250500 1k 2k 3k 4k 8k
0
20
30
40
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
50
*
**
**
**
**
60
**
70
80
Poorer ear
Fig. 1. Comparison of air-conduction hearing thresholds among groups, normal bone mineral density (BMD) (n = 102), osteopenia (n = 106) and osteoporosis (n = 116).
Signicant differences are marked, *P < .05; **P < .01.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana August 02, 2016.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2016. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Osteopenia
Osteoporosis
Better ear
250 Hz
500 Hz
1 kHz
2 kHz
3 kHz
4 kHz
17.6 7.4
17.6 7.7
18.4 10.2
21.0 11.7
23.1 13.6
25.2 16.5
22.6 11.8
25.2 16.5*
26.5 17.1**
30.4 19.4**
35.5 20.9**
36.4 20.2**
27.1 12.3**
29.2 14.7**
29.8 14.9**
33.1 16.5**
37.8 17.6**
40.6 18.4**
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
Poorer ear
250 Hz
500 Hz
1 kHz
2 kHz
3 kHz
4 kHz
22.4 9.3
21.9 11.2
19.9 12.1
22.5 14.9
26.7 18.6
26.7 18.6
27.8 17.9
32.6 20.1**
31.8 20.3**
32.9 22.1*
40.8 26.0*
41.3 24.6**
31.1 15.1**
34.5 18.2**
33.6 18.2**
37.2 19.1**
42.8 22.5**
43.1 20.4**
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
Data are presented as mean SD. Signicant differences are marked, *P < .05;
**P < .01, for the comparison with the normal group.
Table 6
Association of age, BMD results, serum vitamin D and serum Ca2+ with hearing loss
analyzed by multiple logistic regression analyses.
Age
Lumbar BMD
Femur neck BMD
Serum vitamin D
Serum calcium
OR
P value
95% CI
1.1
2.8
0.4
1.0
2.2
.019
.047
>.05
>.05
>.05
1.02,
0.97,
0.13,
0.93,
0.61,
1.27
8.28
1.20
1.03
8.15
BMD, bone mineral density; OR, odds ratio; CI, condence interval.
159
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana August 02, 2016.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2016. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
160
References
[1] Crews JE, Campbell VA. Vision impairment and hearing loss among community-dwelling older Americans: implications for health and functioning. Am J
Public Health 2004;94:8239.
[2] Cruickshanks KJ, Wiley TL, Tweed TS, Klein BE, Klein R, Mares-Perlman JA, et al.
Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam Wisconsin: The
Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. Am J Epidemiol 1998;148:87986.
[3] Gates GA, Cooper Jr JC, Kannel WB, Miller NJ. Hearing in the elderly. The
Framingham cohort, 1983-1985, Part 1, basic audiometric test results. Ear
Hear 1990;11:24756.
[4] Chisolm TH, Willott JF, Lister JJ. The aging auditory system: anatomic and
physiologic changes and implications for rehabilitation. Int J Audiol
2003;42(Suppl 2):S310.
[5] Monsell EM. The mechanism of hearing loss in Pagets disease of bone.
Laryngoscope 2004;114:598606.
[6] Shin YJ, Fraysse B, Deguine O, Cognard C, Charlet JP, Sevely A. Sensorineural
hearing loss and otosclerosis: a clinical and radiologic survey of 437 cases.
Acta Otolaryngol 2001;121:2004.
[7] De Groot J, Huizing E, Damsma H, Zonneveld F, van Waes PF. Labyrinthine
otosclerosis studied by means of a new computed tomography technique. Ann
Otol 1985;94:2235.
[8] Pestasnicyk J. Tomography of the temporal bone in Pagets disease. Am J
Roengenology 1969;105:83843.
[9] Khan A, Lore J. Osteoporosis relative to head and neck. J Med 1984;27984.
[10] Doherty JK, Linthicum Jr FH. Spiral ligament and stria vascularis changes in
cochlear otosclerosis: effect on hearing level. Otol Neurotol 2004;25:45764.
[11] Clark K, Sowers MR, Wallace RB, Jannausch ML, Lemke J, Anderson CV. Agerelated hearing loss and bone mass in a population of rural women aged 60 to
85 years. Ann Epidemiol 1995;5:814.
[12] Ozkiris M, Karacavus S, Kapusuz Z, Balbaloglu O, Saydam L. Does bone mineral
density have an effect on hearing loss in postmenopausal patients? Ann Otol
Rhinol Laryngol 2013;122:64852.
[13] Kahveci OK, Demirdal US, Yucedag F, Cerci U. Patients with osteoporosis have
higher incidence of sensorineural hearing loss. Clin Otolaryngol 2014;39:1459.
[14] Mendy A, Vieira ER, Albatineh AN, Nnadi AK, Lowry D, Gasana J. Low bone
mineral density is associated with balance and hearing impairments. Ann
Epidemiol 2014;24:5862.
[15] Helzner EP, Cauley JA, Pratt SR, Wisniewski SR, Talbott EO, Zmuda JM, et al.
Hearing sensitivity and bone mineral density in older adults: the health, aging
and body composition study. Osteoporosis Int 2005;16:1675.
[16] Brookes G. Vitamin D deciency and deafness: 1984 update. Am J Otol
1985;6:1027.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana August 02, 2016.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2016. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.