Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Robert R. Gehler v. Paul E. M. Iasigi, 407 F.2d 448, 3rd Cir. (1969)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views1 page
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court in favor of the plaintiff, Robert R. Gehler, in a case involving $1,143.24 for bookkeeping and tax analysis services rendered to the defendant, Paul E. M. Iasigi. The District Court affirmed the judgment of the Municipal Court, which found in favor of the plaintiff after resolving questions of fact. The Court of Appeals agreed that there was no clear error in the Municipal Court's factual findings and conclusions.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1969-02-06 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 407 F.2d 448 Docket: 17384_1

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court in favor of the plaintiff, Robert R. Gehler, in a case involving $1,143.24 for bookkeeping and tax analysis services rendered to the defendant, Paul E. M. Iasigi. The District Court affirmed the judgment of the Municipal Court, which found in favor of the plaintiff after resolving questions of fact. The Court of Appeals agreed that there was no clear error in the Municipal Court's factual findings and conclusions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views1 page

    Robert R. Gehler v. Paul E. M. Iasigi, 407 F.2d 448, 3rd Cir. (1969)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court in favor of the plaintiff, Robert R. Gehler, in a case involving $1,143.24 for bookkeeping and tax analysis services rendered to the defendant, Paul E. M. Iasigi. The District Court affirmed the judgment of the Municipal Court, which found in favor of the plaintiff after resolving questions of fact. The Court of Appeals agreed that there was no clear error in the Municipal Court's factual findings and conclusions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    407 F.

    2d 448

    Robert R. GEHLER
    v.
    Paul E. M. IASIGI, Appellant.
    No. 17384.

    United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.


    Argued at Christiansted January 30, 1969.
    Decided February 6, 1969.

    Paul E. M. Iasigi, pro se.


    Britain H. Bryant, Christiansted, V. I., for appellee.
    Before FREEDMAN, VAN DUSEN and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.
    OPINION OF THE COURT
    PER CURIAM.

    Defendant has argued pro se his appeal from a judgment in the amount of
    $1,143.24 and an attorney's fee of $225.00 for services rendered to him by the
    plaintiff as a bookkeeper and tax analyst.

    The District Court affirmed the judgment of the Municipal Court in a


    comprehensive opinion which makes it clear that the case involved questions of
    fact which the Municipal Court resolved in favor of the plaintiff, a conclusion
    which it could not say was clearly erroneous. 6 V.I. 352.

    We agree and therefore will affirm the judgment of the District Court.

    You might also like