Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    25 views1 page
    The Third Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling in a case involving John Pansy appealing a decision against Ernest Preate and other officials with Pennsylvania's Office of Attorney General. The one-paragraph opinion did not provide any details about the underlying case or issues, but indicated it was affirming the lower court's ruling and that the opinion would not be published in the Federal Reporter due to lacking precedential or institutional value beyond the parties and trial court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-06-20 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 61 F.3d 896 Docket: 94-7664

    Original Title

    John A. Pansy v. Ernest D. Preate, Jr., John Burfete, Lois Lichtenwalner, Michael Crossin, Joseph Farkus, Charles Read, Thomas Gallagher, John Purcell, Other Unidentified Special Agents With Pennsylvania's Office of Attorney General, 61 F.3d 896, 3rd Cir. (1995)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Third Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling in a case involving John Pansy appealing a decision against Ernest Preate and other officials with Pennsylvania's Office of Attorney General. The one-paragraph opinion did not provide any details about the underlying case or issues, but indicated it was affirming the lower court's ruling and that the opinion would not be published in the Federal Reporter due to lacking precedential or institutional value beyond the parties and trial court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    25 views1 page

    United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The Third Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling in a case involving John Pansy appealing a decision against Ernest Preate and other officials with Pennsylvania's Office of Attorney General. The one-paragraph opinion did not provide any details about the underlying case or issues, but indicated it was affirming the lower court's ruling and that the opinion would not be published in the Federal Reporter due to lacking precedential or institutional value beyond the parties and trial court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    61 F.

    3d 896

    John A. Pansy
    v.
    Ernest D. Preate, Jr., John Burfete, Lois Lichtenwalner,
    Michael Crossin, Joseph Farkus, Charles Read, Thomas
    Gallagher, John Purcell, other unidentified special agents
    with Pennsylvania's Office of Attorney General
    NO. 94-7664

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Third Circuit.
    June 20, 1995

    Appeal From: M.D.Pa., No. 92-00778,


    Conaboy, J.,

    870 F.Supp. 612


    1

    AFFIRMED.

    2
    Federal
    Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions
    having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value
    only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter
    tables are prepared from lists of cases terminated by judgment orders, unpublished
    per curiam opinions and unpublished signed opinions, indicating the disposition of
    each case, transmitted by the Court. Third Circuit Rules, App. 1, Internal Operating
    Procedures, Ch. 5, sec. 5.1, 28 U.S.C.A.)

    You might also like