Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • John J. Halko, Jr. v. Raymond W. Anderson, 359 F.2d 435, 3rd Cir. (1966)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    John J. Halko appealed his conviction of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated that was imposed by the Superior Court of Delaware. Halko sought habeas corpus in federal district court, alleging his trial was fundamentally unfair. The district court considered each of Halko's arguments and denied the writ, finding no error of constitutional dimension or denial of due process. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's order, agreeing there was no showing of a violation of due process.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1966-05-31 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 359 F.2d 435 Docket: 15615_1

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    John J. Halko appealed his conviction of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated that was imposed by the Superior Court of Delaware. Halko sought habeas corpus in federal district court, alleging his trial was fundamentally unfair. The district court considered each of Halko's arguments and denied the writ, finding no error of constitutional dimension or denial of due process. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's order, agreeing there was no showing of a violation of due process.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    John J. Halko, Jr. v. Raymond W. Anderson, 359 F.2d 435, 3rd Cir. (1966)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    John J. Halko appealed his conviction of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated that was imposed by the Superior Court of Delaware. Halko sought habeas corpus in federal district court, alleging his trial was fundamentally unfair. The district court considered each of Halko's arguments and denied the writ, finding no error of constitutional dimension or denial of due process. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's order, agreeing there was no showing of a violation of due process.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    359 F.

    2d 435

    John J. HALKO, Jr., Appellant,


    v.
    Raymond W. ANDERSON.
    No. 15615.

    United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.


    Argued April 19, 1966.
    Decided May 5, 1966.
    Rehearing Denied May 31, 1966.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware;
    Caleb R. Layton, III, Judge, 244 F.Supp. 696.
    John J. Krafsig, Jr., Harrisburg, Pa., for appellant.
    Ruth M. Ferrell, Deputy Atty. Gen., Wilmington, Del., for appellee.
    Before KALODNER, HASTIE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    The Superior Court of Delaware has imposed a jail sentence upon the petitioner
    pursuant to a conviction of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The
    petitioner has sought habeas corpus in the District Court for the District of
    Delaware alleging fundamental unfairness in his trial. In a careful opinion the
    District Court considered each point made by the petitioner and denied the writ.
    We agree that no error of constitutional dimension, no denial of due process of
    law, has been shown.

    The Order of the District Court will be affirmed.

    You might also like