Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ralph Michael Lepiscopo v. United States, 376 F.2d 846, 3rd Cir. (1967)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views1 page
    Ralph Michael Lepiscopo appealed his conviction of bank robbery and use of a dangerous weapon. The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Lepiscopo's collateral proceeding under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court agreed with the district court that Lepiscopo's petition and supplement failed to establish sufficient grounds for the relief sought, as he was competently represented throughout his trial and appeal. The district court's judgment was affirmed.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1967-04-14 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 376 F.2d 846 Docket: 16246

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ralph Michael Lepiscopo appealed his conviction of bank robbery and use of a dangerous weapon. The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Lepiscopo's collateral proceeding under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court agreed with the district court that Lepiscopo's petition and supplement failed to establish sufficient grounds for the relief sought, as he was competently represented throughout his trial and appeal. The district court's judgment was affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views1 page

    Ralph Michael Lepiscopo v. United States, 376 F.2d 846, 3rd Cir. (1967)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ralph Michael Lepiscopo appealed his conviction of bank robbery and use of a dangerous weapon. The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Lepiscopo's collateral proceeding under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court agreed with the district court that Lepiscopo's petition and supplement failed to establish sufficient grounds for the relief sought, as he was competently represented throughout his trial and appeal. The district court's judgment was affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    376 F.

    2d 846

    Ralph Michael LEPISCOPO, Appellant,


    v.
    UNITED STATES of America.
    No. 16246.

    United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.


    Submitted March 7, 1967.
    Decided April 14, 1967.

    Ralph Michael Lepiscopo, pro se.


    Johnathan Kohn, David M. Satz, Jr., U.S. Attys., Newark, N.J., for
    appellee.
    OPINION OF THE COURT
    Before McLAUGHLIN, HASTIE and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM.

    Appellant was convicted in the New Jersey District of bank robbery and use of
    a dangerous weapon. This Court affirmed the conviction, 343 F.2d 474 (1965)
    and certiorari was denied, 382 U.S. 864, 86 S.Ct. 129, 15 L.Ed.2d 102 (1965).
    Appellant was represented by competent counsel throughout his trial and
    appeal. As to this collateral 28 U.S.C. 2255 proceeding we must agree with the
    District Court that the petition and its supplement fail to set forth any sufficient
    ground for the relief sought.

    The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

    You might also like