Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Antonio Da Cruz v. T. J. Holland, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, 222 F.2d 263, 3rd Cir. (1955)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed the order of the district court dismissing a complaint for want of jurisdiction in the case of Antonio Da Cruz v. T. J. Holland, District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. The appellate court cited the precedents of Shaughnessy v. Pedreiro and Diogo v. Holland in reaching its decision to remand the case back to the district court with directions to reinstate the complaint.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1955-05-17 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 222 F.2d 263 Docket: 11527

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed the order of the district court dismissing a complaint for want of jurisdiction in the case of Antonio Da Cruz v. T. J. Holland, District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. The appellate court cited the precedents of Shaughnessy v. Pedreiro and Diogo v. Holland in reaching its decision to remand the case back to the district court with directions to reinstate the complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    Antonio Da Cruz v. T. J. Holland, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, 222 F.2d 263, 3rd Cir. (1955)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed the order of the district court dismissing a complaint for want of jurisdiction in the case of Antonio Da Cruz v. T. J. Holland, District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. The appellate court cited the precedents of Shaughnessy v. Pedreiro and Diogo v. Holland in reaching its decision to remand the case back to the district court with directions to reinstate the complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    222 F.

    2d 263

    Antonio DA CRUZ, Appellant,


    v.
    T. J. HOLLAND, District Director, Immigration and
    Naturalization Service, Appellee.
    No. 11527.

    United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.


    Argued May 16, 1955.
    Decided May 17, 1955.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    Pennsylvania; Thomas J. Clary, Judge.
    J. J. Kilimnik, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.
    Francis Ballard, Asst. U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.
    Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM.

    Upon the authority of Shaughnessy v. Pedreiro, 75 S.Ct. 591, and Diogo v.


    Holland, 3 Cir., 221 F.2d 806, the order of the district court dismissing the
    complaint for want of jurisdiction will be reversed and the cause will be
    remanded with directions to reinstate the complaint.

    You might also like