Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Mabel Whayne v. M. v. Shuttler, Inc., Lea River Lines, Inc., and Transportation Management Service, Inc, 397 F.2d 287, 3rd Cir. (1968)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views1 page
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. It summarizes that the plaintiff Mabel Whayne brought civil and admiralty actions against three defendants, and the district court vacated service against two defendants and dismissed the actions against the third defendant with prejudice. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's orders, finding no error in the lower court's rulings.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1968-12-09 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 397 F.2d 287 Docket: 15921

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. It summarizes that the plaintiff Mabel Whayne brought civil and admiralty actions against three defendants, and the district court vacated service against two defendants and dismissed the actions against the third defendant with prejudice. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's orders, finding no error in the lower court's rulings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views1 page

    Mabel Whayne v. M. v. Shuttler, Inc., Lea River Lines, Inc., and Transportation Management Service, Inc, 397 F.2d 287, 3rd Cir. (1968)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. It summarizes that the plaintiff Mabel Whayne brought civil and admiralty actions against three defendants, and the district court vacated service against two defendants and dismissed the actions against the third defendant with prejudice. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's orders, finding no error in the lower court's rulings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    397 F.

    2d 287

    Mabel WHAYNE, Appellant,


    v.
    M. V. SHUTTLER, INC., Lea River Lines, Inc., and
    Transportation Management Service, Inc.
    Nos. 15920, 15921.

    United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.


    Argued Sept. 15, 1967, Reargued May 20, 1968.
    Decided June 19, 1968, Certiorari Denied Dec. 9, 1968, See
    89 S.Ct. 445.

    Avram G. Adler, Freedman, Borowsky & Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., for


    appellant.
    Joseph A. Barone, Krusen, Evans & Byrne, Philadelphia, Pa. (Robert Cox,
    Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.
    Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER, and STALEY, Circuit Judges.
    OPINION OF THE COURT
    PER CURIAM.

    This appeal arises out of civil and admiralty actions brought by Mabel Whayne
    against M. V. Shuttler, Inc., Lea River Lines, Inc., and Transportation
    Management Service, Inc. Plaintiff-libellant appeals from orders of the district
    court vacating service as to M. V. Shuttler, Inc., and Lea River Lines, Inc., and
    dismissing with prejudice the actions against Transportation Management
    Service, Inc.

    We have carefully reviewed the entire record in this matter and we can find no
    error. Accordingly, the orders of the district court will be affirmed.

    You might also like