Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Franklin Evon Sebetich v. United States, 828 F.2d 1020, 3rd Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    30 views1 page
    Franklin Evon Sebetich filed a petition for panel rehearing and rehearing in banc of his case, Sebetich v. United States, in which the Third Circuit Court of Appeals had previously issued a decision. The petition was submitted to the original panel of judges and all other circuit judges. No judge on the original panel requested a rehearing. Additionally, a majority of circuit judges did not vote for a rehearing of the case before the full court. As a result, the petition for rehearing filed by Sebetich was denied.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1987-09-18 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 828 F.2d 1020 Docket: 84-3665

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Franklin Evon Sebetich filed a petition for panel rehearing and rehearing in banc of his case, Sebetich v. United States, in which the Third Circuit Court of Appeals had previously issued a decision. The petition was submitted to the original panel of judges and all other circuit judges. No judge on the original panel requested a rehearing. Additionally, a majority of circuit judges did not vote for a rehearing of the case before the full court. As a result, the petition for rehearing filed by Sebetich was denied.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    30 views1 page

    Franklin Evon Sebetich v. United States, 828 F.2d 1020, 3rd Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Franklin Evon Sebetich filed a petition for panel rehearing and rehearing in banc of his case, Sebetich v. United States, in which the Third Circuit Court of Appeals had previously issued a decision. The petition was submitted to the original panel of judges and all other circuit judges. No judge on the original panel requested a rehearing. Additionally, a majority of circuit judges did not vote for a rehearing of the case before the full court. As a result, the petition for rehearing filed by Sebetich was denied.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    828 F.

    2d 1020

    Franklin Evon SEBETICH, Appellant


    v.
    UNITED STATES of America.
    No. 84-3665.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Third Circuit.
    Sept. 18, 1987.

    Prior report: 3rd Cir., 776 F.2d 412.


    Before GIBBONS, Chief Judge, and SEITZ, WEIS, HIGGINBOTHAM,
    SLOVITER, BECKER, MANSMANN, and GREENBERG, Circuit
    Judges.

    1
    SUR
    PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR
    REHEARING IN BANC
    2

    The petition for rehearing filed by appellant, Franklin Evon Sebetich, in the
    above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the
    decision of this court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit
    in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having
    asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular
    active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition
    for rehearing is DENIED.

    You might also like