Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Allison T. Williams v. Raymond W. Anderson, 361 F.2d 335, 3rd Cir. (1966)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views1 page
    Allison Williams appealed his Delaware Superior Court conviction. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding that Williams' conviction did not conflict with recent Supreme Court rulings on coerced confessions or right to counsel. The appellate court also found no other substantial errors in the state trial.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1966-06-01 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 361 F.2d 335 Docket: 15755_1

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Allison Williams appealed his Delaware Superior Court conviction. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding that Williams' conviction did not conflict with recent Supreme Court rulings on coerced confessions or right to counsel. The appellate court also found no other substantial errors in the state trial.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    Allison T. Williams v. Raymond W. Anderson, 361 F.2d 335, 3rd Cir. (1966)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Allison Williams appealed his Delaware Superior Court conviction. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding that Williams' conviction did not conflict with recent Supreme Court rulings on coerced confessions or right to counsel. The appellate court also found no other substantial errors in the state trial.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    361 F.

    2d 335

    Allison T. WILLIAMS, Appellant,


    v.
    Raymond W. ANDERSON.
    No. 15755.

    United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.


    Argued May 20, 1966.
    Decided June 1, 1966.

    David Snellenburg, II, Wilmington, Del., for appellant.


    Charles L. Paruszewski, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Wilmington, Del., for
    appellee.
    Before STALEY, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and SMITH, Circuit
    Judges.
    OPINION OF THE COURT
    PER CURIAM.

    The judgment of conviction of appellant in the Delaware Superior Court on its


    own particular facts is not in conflict with Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84
    S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964) or with Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378
    U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977 (1964), whether or not finally held
    retrospective in its application or with United States ex rel. Russo v. State of
    New Jersey, 351 F.2d 429 (3 Cir. 1965). In all other aspects the state trial was
    free from substantial error.

    The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

    You might also like