Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Arthur W. Gibson v. United States of America, United States Maritime Commission, 200 F.2d 336, 3rd Cir. (1952)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views1 page
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the decision of the lower court in a case between Arthur W. Gibson and the United States Maritime Commission. The appeals court found no errors in the lower court's findings of fact, conclusions of law, or opinion written by Judge Harry E. Kalodner. A careful examination of briefs, records, and oral arguments convinced the appeals court that the lower court's decision should stand.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1952-12-22 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 200 F.2d 336 Docket: 10758_1

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the decision of the lower court in a case between Arthur W. Gibson and the United States Maritime Commission. The appeals court found no errors in the lower court's findings of fact, conclusions of law, or opinion written by Judge Harry E. Kalodner. A careful examination of briefs, records, and oral arguments convinced the appeals court that the lower court's decision should stand.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views1 page

    Arthur W. Gibson v. United States of America, United States Maritime Commission, 200 F.2d 336, 3rd Cir. (1952)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the decision of the lower court in a case between Arthur W. Gibson and the United States Maritime Commission. The appeals court found no errors in the lower court's findings of fact, conclusions of law, or opinion written by Judge Harry E. Kalodner. A careful examination of briefs, records, and oral arguments convinced the appeals court that the lower court's decision should stand.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    200 F.

    2d 336

    Arthur W. GIBSON
    v.
    UNITED STATES of America, United States Maritime
    Commission, Appellant.
    No. 10758.

    United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.


    Argued December 2, 1952.
    Decided December 22, 1952.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    Pennsylvania. Harry E. Kalodner, Judge.
    Thomas E. Byrne, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. (Gerald A. Gleeson, U. S. Atty.,
    Springer H. Moore, Jr., Rowland C. Evans, Jr., Krusen, Evans & Shaw,
    Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
    Abraham E. Freedman, Philadelphia, Pa. (Charles Lakatos, William M.
    Alper and Freedman, Landy & Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for
    appellee.
    Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM.

    A careful examination of the briefs and the record in this appeal and
    consideration of the oral arguments of counsel have convinced us that the court
    below committed no error in its decision. We can add nothing to the careful
    analyses contained in the findings of fact, in the conclusions of law, and in the
    opinion of Judge Kalodner. See 100 F.Supp. 954. Accordingly the judgment of
    the court below will be affirmed.

    You might also like