Gripe toolbox

China PTX
Plan makes Xi more credible and this would lead to radical motion in china
Lead to better reforms. Eon reform w/ anti-corruption reform or PLA reform
Corruption necessary for economy and produces econ growth. (has better
internal link)
PLA reform leads to upgrades and power projections and leads to death
Could break new scenarios with the disad and Chinese politics are hella
interesting
19th congress and next couple months k2 agenda so he can stack politburo in
favor.
Hog decision made china not do shit in scs. Increasing pla reform.
Mega tiger- xi after mega tiger ruins political factions.
Can swap shit out. Make the fucker guess around.
Factions a lot of mean girls ( plastics= princinelings, too much power will
upse the fuck it up.
Much better than politics and much better than downballot
No better disad for turns argument. Impact and uniqueness are good so
outcard the mofo
Quasi fuckers going down w/ case. You know china better than they think you
know china.
Weakest part of disad is the linkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk but you can use window
argument

CP
Adv cp- did not cut impact turns for every adv. Could find a solid benefit.
Solid impact turns aand net benefit for the case
CP one adv and turn the adv. Run da with turn on one adv and cp other and
take them out.
Space space situation cp that deals with miscalc. Ratify weapons and shit
cp - something within the un and dont develop defensive shit w/ treaty. 2nc
cp on solar flares w/ nasa already trying to solve
Steel remove us countermeasures on china so that they will remove. This
solves int benefit of tensions. Low steel prices would be good. Object fiat
china should put the limit fiat good.
Warming- carbon cap CP with to solve and warming shit today.
Cybersecurity US no first policy CP. Willing to give zero days shit CP. UN CP
w/ multilateral treaty.
Consult CP consulation with japan before plan. Args similar to japan da but
tricker. China is friction driver btwn usjapan relations. consult is limited just
complete. Have to use japan disad evidence. Links to net benefit are any evi
on japan being abdoming or reassuring that we are going to side with china.
100 percent net benefit. Would help both sides and be good alliance. bad
links as in japan will say no to fucker on plan. Will test your skills and how
consultiaon will sooth their shit answer to perm are realy soon shit. Japan
are good partner and gov will leak. Any of aff would be stopped. There are no
links and shit and Obama will take cre of everything. Alliance is good and not
break. Us japan alliance bad (go to disad file). Cp makes you explain da link
really deeply. 2ac theory args will go in there

Anti-Blackness

Based on idea blackness of slave trade and America is bad on black people.
Based off of ontology that black people are hated by americans
Args are best against k
China is total anti black and space would explore anto balck ideology and
would hurt the shit out of it
Links to space and mes and diplo and econ engage. Needs link to plan and
epistem of the case and ir relations of the case. Have a bunch of good cards
for this shit. Have good args that ir messes up what we see domestically and
domestic the problem. Needs to prove why intl shit change the game. Affs
needs to tell how shit has changed over time.
Differences between of 1nc the plan legislates for a lot of shit. Files can be
used several ways. Fuck. Can start from pedagogy and be anywhere and be
really useful and will probably win the round.
Aff- some peolep base their shit off of intl trade on atl slave trade which is
bad.respond towards theory and other shit. Want to go for the aff and that
the premises of the aff are great. Needs to win more than defense of the
theory. IR works better than whatever the fuck you are saying.
Alt- something ananylsis in 1nc. Others are preferred. Produced a lot of alts
that can be used and can be specific. Produced alt of forgetting for ccp aff.
Can pic out of aff w/ anti blackness

Psycho
Not about getting into their minds. Not about conspiracy theories.
Its about lacan and Kristeva.
Core- about desire and desire in politics and sub structures in politics. The
poepl ein state make the shit. Athors flip the shit by saying indivi make
investment into shit make the big shit happen. The small shit makes the big
shit.
Not complete individual and lacking sujects. We all lack the subject and the
whole last thing to make us whole. Always trying to fill the lack
Langauge- the way individual desries works into langague and discourses and
certain ways of race understanding. Its whats gives them power. If we stop
investing inotthe idea of nation and then nation would collapse. If we stopped
believing it would end. Because we leave in language and thats what matter.
Death drive- idea that we fail to find the object to findish us and we enjoy the
process. Apply that to ir. Nation states has a unconcousness and phsyco shit
can analyze what happens.
Semiotic Kristeva symbolic are the culture and shit we use. Semiotic- bodies
relating to language and desure. Talks about race and other stuff and why it
links to aff.
Intimacy- the singular individuals should relate to state. How we should relate
to be indivi and realte to policies.
Abjection not explain
Policy K ir forgets indivials exist forgets role of desire and what is
happening. Forgets the relationship from the individual to the nationstate. Ks
tradiational support. Let the impacts happen. Dont avoid nuke war and
accept the nuke war. Endorse apoc. Find ourselves fear and go away from
fear and look towards poems and shit.
K K- demanding recognition for radical is bad. All those fucks are posers and
be locked in poserdom and getting addictied. Anthropence aff- reframe what
we should be looking at. K of decon and toxicity aff.
Lots of links, interesting literature base, emma and Rikki put shit in there,
wont stay thrown
Aff- physcholoanylsis is wrong and why its abstract bullshit. Why it doesnt
apply to individual and why it doesnt apply to social desire. Generically
engage in instiatution. K of lacan and Kristeva. They are sexist and racist. The
perm is legit and strongest arg

Global Gov
How tech of gov increase shit. Flexable. Choose interchangle parts with
impact scenarios and impact problems. Place 1nc of most affs
Two main alts to K. 1. Democracy of politics distinction of democracy of
politics and policits of democracy. Makes the difference of practice of args.
Makes demorcy of politics empty place ofpwoer. Interps of power and what
values it has in political structure. Offered as and promoted as into the liberal
democracy. Can we return to democrayco of politics with empty place of
power. Can use it to challenge contempory forms of shit. Challegnes normal
forms and solves impacts with articulation of theory.
The second alt is psycho politics. Alt is abuot reorient of tech of govs and
denying that shit. Challenges liberalism. Forcloses imaginries and think of
differing shit. Doesnt do stuff on alrge scales. How we as individual relate tod
iffernet thigns. Impacts of ontological go psycho.
Demo of politics for better large imapcts like warming.
Theory 2 main sources are zhang cards a lot of econ engage and about
gov emtnality and borad ass shit. And china shit from there. 2. Wendy brown,
look at 03 and neolib and the end of demo. Talks abiout demo and how states
work and nellib in state. How we are subjetivised. Imapcts of those kind of
politics
Links to wto. Debate will be about impact turn debate. Isolate certain
scenariosna dn win the impact turns.
The aff answers flex. Can take legalism approach that neg doesnt
understand power and that the alt solves. Why neolib is good and. Dont use
neolib good for that. Use the perms and shti. Solvency dumps on the kritik.
Question the theory of the neg. familairze ourself with answers so you know
what to do to dbate the k
Bigestg framing shit and polical subjectivity and what reps made by the aff.
Want to win the larger impacts. Look at the imapcts of the policy. Forces you
tot look at impact turn.. change the prio arg towards impact turns ass the
neg.

Colonialism
Question focused on the firs sin of the us and how we effected other
countries. Makes arg of how we needs to prioer it as a structure
Nc on policy is about links and what is starting point of politics or should we
focus on shit like that. Second is based on flobal stuff abroad and blinds us
from relations of indigenous and orginal violence. Have a bunch of links
against all the affs. Goes into how colonialism justifies genocide and death
drive and Nazism. Alt is red pegagogy.. talks how edu spces k2 to resistance
and western logicals.
Nc on k teams root casues of violence. Instand of focusing on anti
blackness, should focsus on colonial ism and what is has casued. Alt is red
pedagogy
Indeignouse art and what it has doneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee ex mexico
us border w/ genocidal violence. Alt of tucka nd yang. Put alt aginst tri aff and
mainstream queer theory and indigenous theory. Umbrella shit. How setller
colonialism ninarie s on normal binaries
Aff- specific perms for each aff. Why engaging in legal shit is productive in
triabl soverigneiety and why tribal shit is important. In context of intl realtions
of people fighting for indpenednt movment.s takes away specif c violences .
arg about speaking of others is bad. Aka speaking for native americans
commmodiefies it for a ballot asking.
Should be focusing on what they say.

Scmittttt
Nc shells to all affs. All about the same but diff links but based on same idea.
Based on friend enemy divide. Always political actors deivide and needs to
know distinction. War is better than violence o the other that isnt enough to
be included. Alt conflict should happen but within friend and enemy shti.
Alt for most (ecpeti decon) to make distinct between friend and enemy and
change politics. Violence is simple. Impact turn is simple. coop w/ china no
they enemy
Decon link is made into pan aff. Direct impact turn to aff. Objectification of
theory and chian is the enemy and we need to keep it that way. Explains shit
in derridian terms. Having knowledge of theory behind turn on deon would be
helpful.
Aff general perms and some inclusion can be good and some persm made
on spot. Have to use 1ac to answer the k. best way to go againt the k the
aff is stupid and doesnt take inot all the scenarios and is plain stupid.
Specific answers scmitt is bad (lots of ways). He wrote the constitution. The
nazi calls is a way to vote aff. The same thought made the Nazis.
Aff is kind of right. Cosmo politican cards are pretty useful. Direct answers
towards climate cahgne.
The good thing about trump. He sees the shit about enemy and that he
defends scmitian politicals and he links to k

Movements
Lots of disdsa and cap k updates
Cyber aff disad- disad to multistake. Allo cooperations holding power and that
leads to centralized prive powers and they gain control of everything.
Space disad int link turns to why space is bad. That helium 3 mining would
destroy moon and moon good. Cooperations would fight over helium mining
and that wr would trigger problems
Gagon evidence and nasa becomes new front to mic