Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Thomas v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Alfred T. Thomas and Randy L. Thomas against Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools and others. The district court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. They denied the plaintiffs' motions to certify questions and for sanctions, and did not require oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-06-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-2281

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Alfred T. Thomas and Randy L. Thomas against Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools and others. The district court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. They denied the plaintiffs' motions to certify questions and for sanctions, and did not require oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Thomas v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Alfred T. Thomas and Randy L. Thomas against Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools and others. The district court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. They denied the plaintiffs' motions to certify questions and for sanctions, and did not require oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-2281

    ALFRED T. THOMAS; RANDY L. THOMAS,


    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    versus
    CHARLOTTE
    MECKLENBURG
    SCHOOLS;
    RAYMOND
    GIOVANELLI; MUFFET GARBER; MICHELE E. MORRIS;
    MARIA B. PETREA,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior
    District Judge. (3:06-cv-00238)

    Submitted:

    June 21, 2007

    Decided:

    June 26, 2007

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Alfred T. Thomas, Randy L. Thomas, Appellants Pro Se. Mark Weston


    Johnson, HELMS, MULLISS & WICKER, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina,
    for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Alfred T. Thomas and Randy L. Thomas appeal the district
    courts order granting Defendants motion to dismiss and dismissing
    the 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Thomas v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools, No. 3:06-cv-00238

    (W.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 2006).

    We deny Thomas motions to certify and

    for sanctions, and dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like