Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Worrell, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    David Patrick Worrell appealed the denial of his motion for a writ of audita querela to challenge his criminal conviction. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no errors. It affirmed the district court's denial of the writ for the reasons stated in that court's opinion, which found the writ was not the proper means to challenge his conviction. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-10-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6899

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    David Patrick Worrell appealed the denial of his motion for a writ of audita querela to challenge his criminal conviction. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no errors. It affirmed the district court's denial of the writ for the reasons stated in that court's opinion, which found the writ was not the proper means to challenge his conviction. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views2 pages

    United States v. Worrell, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    David Patrick Worrell appealed the denial of his motion for a writ of audita querela to challenge his criminal conviction. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no errors. It affirmed the district court's denial of the writ for the reasons stated in that court's opinion, which found the writ was not the proper means to challenge his conviction. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-6899

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    DAVID PATRICK WORRELL,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
    District Judge. (4:03-cr-00049-H)

    Submitted:

    October 11, 2007

    Decided:

    October 17, 2007

    Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    David Patrick Worrell, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, OFFICE


    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    David Patrick Worrell appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion for a writ of audita querela pursuant to the All
    Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. 1651(a) (2000).
    and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.

    See United States v.

    Worrell, No. 4:03-cr-00049-H (E.D.N.C. May 29, 2007).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like