Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Balinao v. Mukasey, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to the Attorney General and dismissal of Arlene Balinao's employment discrimination complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court's August 21, 2007 opinion, dispensing with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-03-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-2029

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to the Attorney General and dismissal of Arlene Balinao's employment discrimination complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court's August 21, 2007 opinion, dispensing with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Balinao v. Mukasey, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to the Attorney General and dismissal of Arlene Balinao's employment discrimination complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in that court's August 21, 2007 opinion, dispensing with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-2029

    ARLENE M. BALINAO,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Beaufort.
    Patrick Michael Duffy, District
    Judge. (9:06-cv-00254-PMD)

    Submitted:

    February 11, 2008

    Decided:

    March 18, 2008

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Arlene M. Balinao, Appellant Pro Se. Terri Hearn Bailey, OFFICE OF


    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Arlene M. Balinao appeals the district courts order
    granting summary judgment to the Attorney General and dismissing
    her employment discrimination complaint.
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Balinao v. Mukasey,

    No. 9:06-cv-00254-PMD (D.S.C. Aug. 21, 2007).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like