Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Mills v. Brice, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Albert Curtis Mills under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. The district court denied Mills relief and the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-03-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-7681

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Albert Curtis Mills under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. The district court denied Mills relief and the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Mills v. Brice, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Albert Curtis Mills under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. The district court denied Mills relief and the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-7681

    ALBERT CURTIS MILLS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MICHAEL BRICE; CRYSTAL LEE-HASKINS; DANNY
    STATEN; DARRYL PUGH; ROBERT CHAMBERS; ERIC
    NELSON; THEODORE DONNELL; HENRY GAITHER; MR.
    POPE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.
    Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.
    (CA-00-1962-8)

    Submitted:

    February 28, 2005

    Decided:

    March 28, 2005

    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Albert Curtis Mills, Appellant Pro Se. Phillip Michael Pickus,


    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
    for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Albert Curtis Mills appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Mills v.

    Brice, No. CA-00-1962-8 (D. Md. Sept. 30, 2004).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like