Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Marshall, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. The court affirmed the district court's denial of Kalvin Marshall's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-03-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-7343

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. The court affirmed the district court's denial of Kalvin Marshall's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Marshall, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. The court affirmed the district court's denial of Kalvin Marshall's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-7343

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    KALVIN MARSHALL,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Henry E. Hudson, District
    Judge. (3:02-cr-00225-HEH-2)

    Submitted:

    February 24, 2011

    Decided:

    March 3, 2011

    Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kalvin Marshall, Appellant Pro Se.


    David Thomas Maguire,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Kalvin
    denying

    relief

    Marshall
    on

    his

    motion

    U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006).


    no reversible error.

    appeals
    for

    the

    district

    reduction

    courts

    of

    order

    sentence,

    18

    We have reviewed the record and find

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons


    United States v. Marshall, No.

    stated by the district court.

    3:02-cr-00225-HEH-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 8, 2010).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like