Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Godwin v. Jumbo Sport, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Gail Godwin filed a lawsuit against Jumbo Sport alleging religious discrimination and harassment. The district court dismissed Godwin's claims. Godwin appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no errors in the lower court's reasoning for dismissing the case. The Fourth Circuit also determined that oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court documents.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-04-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-1071

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Gail Godwin filed a lawsuit against Jumbo Sport alleging religious discrimination and harassment. The district court dismissed Godwin's claims. Godwin appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no errors in the lower court's reasoning for dismissing the case. The Fourth Circuit also determined that oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Godwin v. Jumbo Sport, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Gail Godwin filed a lawsuit against Jumbo Sport alleging religious discrimination and harassment. The district court dismissed Godwin's claims. Godwin appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no errors in the lower court's reasoning for dismissing the case. The Fourth Circuit also determined that oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-1071

    GAIL W. GODWIN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JUMBO SPORT, formerly known as Richmond Sports,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
    (CA-97-669-3)
    Submitted:

    March 26, 1998

    Decided:

    April 9, 1998

    Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Gail W. Godwin, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis McKinley Hairston, Jr.,
    WILLIAMS, MULLEN, CHRISTIAN & DOBBINS, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing her
    claims of harassment and religious discrimination. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Godwin v. Jumbo Sport, No. CA-97-669-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 18,
    1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like