Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Johnson v. Medford, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Wayne Thomas Johnson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the reasoning of the district court. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-06-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6415

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Wayne Thomas Johnson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the reasoning of the district court. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views2 pages

    Johnson v. Medford, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Wayne Thomas Johnson filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the reasoning of the district court. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6415

    WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SUE MEDFORD, Nurse Supervisor at Marion
    Correctional Institution, in her official and
    individual
    capacity;
    SID
    HARKLEROAD,
    Superintendent
    at
    Marion
    Correctional
    Institution, in his official and individual
    capacity; ANGELA TWITTY, in her official and
    individual capacity; JANE DOE, in her official
    and individual capacity,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-02-1-1-MU)

    Submitted:

    May 30, 2002

    Decided:

    June 7, 2002

    Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Wayne Thomas Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Wayne
    denying

    Thomas

    relief

    complaint.

    on

    Johnson
    his

    42

    appeals

    the

    U.S.C.A.

    district
    1983

    courts

    (West

    Supp.

    order
    2001)

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion and find no reversible error.


    the reasoning of the district court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on
    Johnson v. Medford, No. CA-

    02-1-1-MU (W.D.N.C. Feb. 26, 2002). We dispense with oral argument


    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like