Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ricky Bartlett v. Max Robeson, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Ricky Bartlett's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against law enforcement officers and his motions for appointment of counsel. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-11-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-7156

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Ricky Bartlett's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against law enforcement officers and his motions for appointment of counsel. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views2 pages

    Ricky Bartlett v. Max Robeson, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Ricky Bartlett's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against law enforcement officers and his motions for appointment of counsel. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. The unpublished opinion is not binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-7156

    RICKY BARTLETT,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    MAX ROBESON; ANTHONY FORBES; JON WORTHINGTON,
    Defendants Appellees,
    and
    CAMDEN SHERIFFS DEPT.,
    Defendant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (5:11-ct-03008-BO)

    Submitted:

    November 20, 2012

    Before TRAXLER,
    Judges.

    Chief

    Judge,

    Decided: November 27, 2012

    and

    SHEDD

    and

    FLOYD,

    Circuit

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ricky Bartlett, Appellant Pro Se. Sonny Sade Haynes, WOMBLE


    CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ricky

    Bartlett

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint and his


    numerous motions for appointment of counsel.
    the record and find no reversible error.
    for

    the

    reasons

    Robeson,
    2012).
    legal
    before

    No.

    stated

    by

    the

    5:11-ct-03008-BO

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    district
    (E.D.N.C.

    court.
    Apr.

    Bartlett
    21

    &

    v.

    June 15,

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like