Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • George Samuel Green, Jr. v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director of The Virginia Department of Corrections, 66 F.3d 315, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal a district court's denial of a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition from the appellant George Samuel Green, Jr. seeking to appeal the district court's denial of relief. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's opinion that adopted the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Fourth Circuit also denied the appellant's motions for deposition and discovery and to file an amended complaint, and deemed his motion to proceed in forma pauperis as moot since the district court had already granted that relief. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-09-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 66 F.3d 315 Docket: 95-6836

    Original Title

    George Samuel Green, Jr. v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, 66 F.3d 315, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal a district court's denial of a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition from the appellant George Samuel Green, Jr. seeking to appeal the district court's denial of relief. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's opinion that adopted the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Fourth Circuit also denied the appellant's motions for deposition and discovery and to file an amended complaint, and deemed his motion to proceed in forma pauperis as moot since the district court had already granted that relief. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    George Samuel Green, Jr. v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director of The Virginia Department of Corrections, 66 F.3d 315, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal a district court's denial of a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition from the appellant George Samuel Green, Jr. seeking to appeal the district court's denial of relief. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's opinion that adopted the recommendation of the magistrate judge. The Fourth Circuit also denied the appellant's motions for deposition and discovery and to file an amended complaint, and deemed his motion to proceed in forma pauperis as moot since the district court had already granted that relief. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    66 F.

    3d 315

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    George Samuel GREEN, Jr., Petitioner--Appellant,
    v.
    Ronald J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of
    Corrections, Respondent--Appellee.
    No. 95-6836.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Sept. 15, 1995.

    George Samuel Green, Jr.,appellant pro se.


    Robert B. Condon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, for appellee.
    Before WIDENER, HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28
    U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find
    no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to
    appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Green v.
    Angelone, No. CA-94-896-2 (E.D.Va. May 8, 1995). We deny Appellant's
    motion for deposition and discovery and his motion for leave to file an
    amended complaint. In addition, we deny Appellant's motion to proceed in
    forma pauperis as moot, since the district court has already granted this relief.
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED.

    You might also like