Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Aziz v. United States, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case where Zafar Aziz appealed the denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court record and found no reversible errors. As such, the appeals court denied Aziz a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying Aziz's § 2255 motion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the case adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-08-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6078

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case where Zafar Aziz appealed the denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court record and found no reversible errors. As such, the appeals court denied Aziz a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying Aziz's § 2255 motion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the case adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Aziz v. United States, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case where Zafar Aziz appealed the denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court record and found no reversible errors. As such, the appeals court denied Aziz a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying Aziz's § 2255 motion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the case adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6078

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    ZAFAR AZIZ,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR92-341-S, CA-96-3909-S)
    Submitted:

    July 24, 1997

    Decided:

    August 6, 1997

    Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Zafar Aziz, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, OFFICE OF THE
    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
    We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
    find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court. Aziz v. United States, CR-92-341-S (D. Md. Dec. 26, 1996).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like